harhol said:In Road Rash I had an ongoing rivalry with Bose that lasted about five years. Regardless of the consequences I would always look for those black 'n' yellow leathers and attempt to force him off a cliff or into a car. Most of the time it ended badly, which only escalated the problem. I think it all started because he made some smart-ass remark after my first ever race and I assumed the AI was actually real. I was young at the time.
O'Leary was also a **** come to think of it. I would try to avoid the other cops as best I could, but not O'Leary, oh no. I'd probably have been able to complete the game in half the time if I hadn't gone out of my way to fight him at every opportunity. My success rate was probably 5%, but it was definitely worth it.
It was a hard choice, I'll admit. I was constantly reorganizing the list, and changing places - Spyro was originally number one, followed by The Sims - but, in the end, I fell for Paper Mario's charm. My first assumption was that it was strictly a game for kids. That's totally false. The game is so much more than that, and I fear that people will ignore the games - not the Wii one, I'll repeat, which is horrible - just because it doesn't look "mature".RAWKSTAR said:Have to agree with Mario being in the list... But Im not to sure if I would have placed him top. Still! nice list!
I agree with you there. While substituting the point-and-click for actual walking was an odd choice, and one that caused a lot of headaches when you'd need to navigate yourself to an extremely tiny item, I still felt the humor in the game was excellent. I found it funnier when my PS2 disk would stutter during conversations, creating conveniently placed pauses in dialogue. That was always good.Brotherofwill said:Thanks for reminding me about Road Rash, totally forgot about that game until now. Those were fun times.
Escape from monkey Island was awesome for the genre, but I was annoyed as hell that you had to actually walk and not click to move (same problem with grim fandango). I consider it the weakest in the series, the humour is still strong but the ending is just about the worst until Assasins Creed came along.
No promises... =DSpektre41 said:A deep love for Twisted Metal 2, Paper Mario, AND a CAD icon?
Please marry me.
Indeed, I am a Blizzard fan, and I did get sucked into WoW at a time. However, it seems I've broken that habit. I can [quite literally] stop playing whenever I want, which I'm doing now. I'm sure I'll pick it up again, stop playing, and then repeat this cycle.phar said:I can agree to most of the list bar Spyro and Anachy Online. Never played Anarchy for really that long so I cant really comment on it, but as a Blizzard fan which you seem to be im suprised you didnt get sucked into WoW.
Spyro I never really liked, there were far better adventure games available at the time.
That was a hard choice... It took a lot of debating. However, though the order in which they are in means something, the entire list should be taken as a whole. I've played many, many, MANY games in my short lifetime, and these are only ten that I've remembered, and WILL remember.Zeeky_Santos said:Starcraft was on there, but it wasn't number one. shame.
Oh, I agree that 3 was still fun, but it just wasn't quite as good as the first two. And, as I said before, the sequels have constantly recycled the egg sub-plot of the 3rd, and it makes you feel as if 3 was the exact same thing bar better graphics. Not to mention that Hunter was more awesome when you weren't playing as him.SpikedDeception said:@Lord Krunk: Really? I guess so... Three was a stretch to include, but it was still fun in my book. I think I'll have to agree that Two really WAS the best of the trio.
Also, thanks. =DVortigar said:Good descriptions of all the games too. Kudos.
Yay I'm not alone.SpikedDeception said:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Spyro the Dragon (PS1)
![]()
Gah! I already broke my own rule!
I can't just choose one here, folks. The only REAL Spyro games, the ones I consider true to the series and/or canon, are Spyro 1, 2 and 3, all for the Playstation 1. The games were action/adventure/platformers that had a childish feel for a mature audience. At least, I believe so. I'm older than I was when I first played them and I still love the games.
You play as the lovable little dragon Spyro, with his DRAGONfly sidekick Sparx, as they were sent on quests to stop an evil villain, save the world - as always - and save Dragons taken captive. Sparx served other purposes other than being pure awesome - I'm sorry, he was, alright? He would change colors, indicating how much health you had left, and would disappear when you were about to die. I always tried to keep the little guy alive.
The controls were pretty sturdy, yet felt a bit tight at times. The sounds of the game were whimsical, and the voice-overs were bad, but "bad" in a good way. Funny dialogue came from a character who wasn't meant to be inherently funny. The games consisted of Spyro visiting a wide variety of landscapes, traversing separate "courses", and collecting keys of various shapes and sizes to unlock a trip to the next area, where the process would repeat.
They released a few games for the Gameboy, and a couple for the PS2 - and even one for the Xbox 360 - but I refuse to play them. Why would I corrupt the great memories I had of Spyro as a child with games that will surely be bad? Really, now.
... Having said that, they're coming out with a 3-D Animated Spyro movie, and I must say, I think I'll be seeing it. If you played the original games, you'd understand. Sparx, you Dragonfly, you. You were pretty awesome. Until David Spade started voicing you in the PS2 games. What happened?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Alex