All Men Cheat

Recommended Videos

hazabaza1

Want Skyrim. Want. Do want.
Nov 26, 2008
9,612
0
0
faranar said:
Of course everyone cheats. Don't tell me that if you're stuck with a girl like this [http://i454.photobucket.com/albums/qq262/rustybindings/37CuteGirl.jpg]and a girl looking like Megan Fox comes along looking for a one night stand you wouldn't go for it. Same thing for the girls. If you're going out with an average looking guy and on your "girls night out" mr. Perfect tries to get into your pants you wouldn't let him?

We've all had crappy partners and unless you're married with children there is really no point in being loyal when a better opportunity presents itself.

So, just curious, have you ever been in a relationship? Not asking that in a 'being a dick' kind of way, I'm genuinely curious.

Also we haven't had enough Fillion recently to cheer this thread up.
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,887
0
0
I would never cheat on someone and I've been cheated on twice, cheating is possibly the shittiest thing a person can (legally) do to another person, not only does it cause unbearable emotional pain it also undermines confidence and destroys the victims ability to trust in other people for a long time afterwards.

I know that's not quite what you asked but that's my answer.
 

ReinWeisserRitter

New member
Nov 15, 2011
749
0
0
I had to block about ten .gifs on the first page just to make it readable. I hate all of you.

Anyway. She's an idiot, you should know she's an idiot, and you should have told her she's an idiot. There are times trying to be reasonable and thoughtful isn't as effective as being blunt, and this is one of those times. Not much more to say about that topic.

I've been cheated on once, twice depending on your opinion. The unarguable time wasn't the person anticipating me doing the same or whatever such nonsense, though; they were just selfish, inconsiderate, and foolish, getting so caught up in what they wanted that they didn't give a shit about anyone's feelings but their own. The results were quite ugly for everyone involved. I chose to forgive them under the circumstances, because I valued what we have more than to just cut it off immediately, and because I don't think they understood the consequences that kind of selfishness has.

They know now, though, and if they make the same mistake twice, they won't get a third chance. I've made it quite clear what they did and what effects it had, and that if they once again don't think the effects on me are worth keeping their genitals to themselves without consulting me, I will drop them like a bad habit, no matter how much I love them, or they me.
 

Colour Scientist

Troll the Respawn, Jeremy!
Jul 15, 2009
4,722
0
0
Madgamer13 said:
I do believe that her opinion forms a coping mechanism for her, however. Something to offset any harsh feelings of morality that may be involved. From how you have described it, she seems to use it as an excuse, to lessen the impact that she is a facilitator for cheating men.

Maybe she is ignoring that these men are using her? Setting a better-than-thou attitude into her rationale against her conquests would certainly help to make her feel like she is using them, the thrill of the risk and all that.

What do you think, Colour-Scientist?
I thought at first it was a kind of justification but she said it so "matter-of-factly" that I can't help but think that she genuinely believes it. Which must be very depressing.

Well, she never actually gets too attached to any of them and has lost interest in guys before once they expressed the desire to leave their girlfriends. It seems as though she's using them as much as they're using her.
 

PhiMed

New member
Nov 26, 2008
1,483
0
0
No, not all men cheat.

No, she's not a bad person for pursuing men in relationships. It's the person in the relationship's responsibility to say no, not every other person on the planet's responsibility to avoid tempting them.

If she's going to hoe it up, I really don't see the difference between sleeping with a bunch of random dudes and sleeping with a bunch of random dudes who have what might as well be hypothetical girlfriends that she will never, ever meet. They're the bad guys.

Also, if she's just looking for sex with randoms, then a guy in a relationship really is the ideal target. They're less likely to attempt to turn all clingy and try to make a relationship out of it.
 

Madgamer13

New member
Sep 20, 2010
116
0
0
Colour-Scientist said:
...Snip!...
Greets!

I've noticed that when a notion linked to an ability to cope becomes important enough, it's idea becomes unquestionable within behaviour. Under that observation I would agree with you that it is quite depressing, but that is only how we could see it with our current experiences.

To learn how she sees her own 'All Men Cheat' attitude towards her conquests, it would certainly be better to ask her directly. I am definately interested if her idea that all men cheat goes beyond the containment of the idea itself, to see if it links into any other thoughts and feelings she might have.

Unfortunately, I am not linked to her in any way, so I wouldn't be able to ask her myself. If you do ever decide to talk to her in depth about this, be sure to add to the discussion here, if you think the information is not too sensitive to share.

I am not certain how to react to her apparant apathy towards men who decide to confront her with their intentions to commit further to her, my morality says to me that it is dispicable of the man to do such a thing, if they've been seeing her behind their girlfriend's back. She too is not considerate of the man's feelings, loosing interest in the way she does when the confrontation comes.

My morality also says that she shouldn't be blamed for this. Yes, it can be considered that if she wasn't there for him to cheat with, he wouldn't be cheating with her, but that is a flawed argument, since he'd just be cheating with someone else if his intention was to cheat.

As such, I dont see the woman here as cheating, even if she is functioning as an enabler. That is assuming that she doesn't have a steady partner herself, of course. Her set of circumstances is possibly at higher risk though, if she targets men in relationships, what could happen to her if she gets together with a controlling man, or ends up on the wrong end of an irrational girlfriend?

I would instead advise caution to her, most relationships I have seen can be considered unstable at best, I personally liken myself to stay out of other people's relationships, fledgling or otherwise.
 

Grumpy Ginger

New member
Jul 9, 2012
85
0
0
Sounds more like she's projecting more than anything http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projection_(psychology). Her line of reasoning being along the same lines of somebody rather egotistical saying "everybody is just in it for themselves" instead of admitting their flaw.
 

Smeggs

New member
Oct 21, 2008
1,253
0
0
What do I think of her rationale?

It's not rational.

It's idiotic and short-sighted and she is blinded by her overpowering infection of slut.

She has no statistics or any form of evidence (because it's stupid and flat-out incorrect) to back up such a claim and sooner or later she's going to catch something.

That's just her trying to come up with an excuse for being a ***** and ruining another woman's relationship. That's like if I was a thief and made some blatantly wrong claim that, "If I don't rob this bank, someone else will."

That's what I think.
 

Zyntoxic

New member
May 9, 2011
215
0
0
Hm,I think the subject is a bit too broad, and in reality a bit more complicated than people might realize.

First off: what is cheating? I've noticed that it is often a term that is thrown about very lightly without specification.
Is it purely physical? Where do you draw the line, kissing or sex, perhaps even earlier than that?
And how much does the amount of emotions involved affect your opinion? Is it ok as long as there are no feelings involved, or is the mere existence of feelings for someone else enough? Or perhaps a mixture of all (Example: kissing is ok as long as you don't feel anything for the other one)?

I believe that most people at least once in their life encounters a grey-zone of sorts, a time where you might be unsure or confused, find your self in a situation that is too complicated for a simple black and white moral compass.
But I think you should always take responsibility for hurting someone else's feelings, and this happens very easily since people have different ideas of what cheating actually is.

As this is a gaming forum I think it is appropriate that I use a game as a references.

In Mass Effect 1 Kaiden is an available love interest, during the second game he will show unwavering distrust towards Shepard for joining up with Cerberus and making it pretty clear he wants nothing to do with Shepard any more after that, despite having a romantic history from the previous game, not unusual Shepard then pursues other romantic options.

Then in the third game Kaiden will confront Shepard about this saying that he "understands why you cheated, but that he still loves you"

for me this came off as very strange because I had no idea I had been cheating, and I believe that this is not too uncommon in real life either.

as for my personal real-life experiences with something that definitely hurt a lot of feelings, yes I do have some, but as I said it is complicated.

but here goes

During the second year of the swedish equivalent of high school I had been with my boyfriend for a little more than a year, and I had just about gotten over the chock of some one actually liking me (I was a very, very lonely person before I got to high school).
And during that one year so many things had changed for me, same for my boyfriend.
So there came a time when he always seemed agitated when I was around and I started noticing that I felt no desire to spend time with him and rather be with people that seemed to appreciate my company.
One of these friends and I seemed to have some pretty good chemistry going and I felt wrong having these feelings without talking to my boyfriend.
We agreed to a break so that I got time to explore what I was actually feeling.
it ended up pretty disastrous though...

It turned out this friend was madly in love with me and we eventually had sex (which I regret to this very day) but we made no real commitments.
At the same time with my ex(or perhaps boyfriend, things weren't exactly clear) things got more complicated when we realized we just couldn't keep off each other now that we just got some more personal space...it was a complete train wreck.
In the end though I felt like my ex(perhaps boyfriend) and I still had too much together, and he luckily felt the same, even though knowing everything that had happened with me and my friend, and as it turned out this has been the most strengthening moment of our currently over 6 years long relationship.
Broke my friends heart though, but he forgave me and it took time.
Today he is one of my closest friends and he have been in a great relationship with a wonderful girl for over two years now.

I will not deny that this is a ghost that haunts my conscience, because I know my actions hurt a lot of people, not only the three of us, but those that held each of us dear was hurt by this incident.
because of so many uncertainties, because things aren't always as clear as one might want them to be, even though none of us called it or considered it cheating since there was no obligations that were being cheated the result was unmistakably similar.
Edit: if it was unclear I consider cheating to be the moment you break the rules set up between you and your partner of what is or isn't allowed, and/or when being dishonest about your feelings
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
faranar said:
Of course everyone cheats. Don't tell me that if you're stuck with a girl like this [http://i454.photobucket.com/albums/qq262/rustybindings/37CuteGirl.jpg]and a girl looking like Megan Fox comes along looking for a one night stand you wouldn't go for it. Same thing for the girls. If you're going out with an average looking guy and on your "girls night out" mr. Perfect tries to get into your pants you wouldn't let him?

We've all had crappy partners and unless you're married with children there is really no point in being loyal when a better opportunity presents itself.
I don't know what's funnier.

That logic, or that fact you're implying that Megan Fox is somehow attractive and not some kind of space frog alien from space.
 

Kyr Knightbane

New member
Jan 3, 2012
427
0
0
I read the OP's posts and topic and realized he or she just created the thread with the title All Men Cheat to get views and comments.... And all the glorious Fillion!!!! But seriously, quit making fake topics about 'controversial' issues... its sad
 

burningdragoon

Warrior without Weapons
Jul 27, 2009
1,935
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
I don't know what's funnier.

That logic, or that fact you're implying that Megan Fox is somehow attractive and not some kind of space frog alien from space.
Hmmm...



I can see the resemblance.

--

Edit: right the topic. No, that's dumb. Not all men cheat. I would argue that everyone has their price, but that's not really the point and most people who would fall under the "wouldn't cheat" group would require pretty unrealistic circumstances for them to actually cheat.
 

shrekfan246

Not actually a Japanese pop star
May 26, 2011
6,374
0
0
Daverson said:
An interesting dilemma.

As a man [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzDK70zO-Eo], objecting to this sort of behaviour is basically admitting that if you were in a relationship, and a stranger prepositioned for sex, you'd agree without question. Whereas not objecting to it is basically admitting that you want to be prepositioned by a stranger for sex.

Kinda like asking "does this outfit makes me look fat". There doesn't seem like a right answer, but Hanlon's razor says that it can't be that all women hate relationships (obviously if this were the case humanity would have died out when feminism happened)... maybe they're testing the waters for chubby chasers?
Objecting to... what behavior? Cheating? How does objecting to cheating "basically admit" to agreeing without question to a [HEADING=1]proposition[/HEADING][footnote]A "preposition" is a grammatical tool, used to link nouns, pronouns, and phrases with other words.[/footnote] for sex? And how is not objecting to cheating mean that you're "basically admitting" to wanting to be propositioned for sex? I want to see what kind of math goes on at your school.

I don't see how you can look at "Objects to cheating" and get "Must want to cheat" and then take the complete opposite ("Doesn't object to cheating") and reach the same conclusion.
 

Asuka Soryu

New member
Jun 11, 2010
2,437
0
0
Phasmal said:
Does make me think, though- who do we consider worse?
The cheater (one in the relationship) or the cheatee (one they cheat with)?
I'd always blame the cheater more, because they made the commitment, but a lot of people just go for the cheatee.
I blame them both equally. You can't 'cheat' without the cheater and the cheatee.

Cheatee, sounds like some knock-off of Cheetos.
 

Stripes

New member
May 22, 2012
158
0
0
Your friends broken logic is just a lame defence for her actions. if she goes out of her way to seduce men who are in relationships and then uses this to prove men are sluts then she does not know irony. This woman's blanket view of a gender is nothing to worry about, she is just a fool.
 

Madgamer13

New member
Sep 20, 2010
116
0
0
Mortai Gravesend said:
It's a flawed argument because you can claim things without evidence? That's not particularly convincing to anyone who doesn't have a vested interest in believing it to be true.
Greets!

No, it is not a flawed argument because I claim anything. Nor am I claiming anything, since whatever beliefs that someone wishes to hold about whether a man would cheat with another woman, is entirely for them to hold. I respect and would not seek to contradict someone's beliefs, regardless of evidence presented by anyone.

The reason of which I say that it is a flawed arguement is that the logic behind stating that such men would not cheat if she was not there, can be easily contested by the logic of an individual's intention, the man in the example cheating regardless of who he has already cheated with.

This does not mean that I am assuming evidence, nor do I intend it to be focused on any particular individual, I am merely attempting to point out the differences in argumentitive logic. If you've taken issue with this, then I apologise.

If we wish to assume evidence on this particular case, I would assume that since men have cheated with her against their girlfriends, I personally find it probable that they'd cheat again with another woman.

What do you think?