But you could argue that if a black scientist were to discover relativity or make huge strides in the theory of evolution, they wouldn't be recognized nearly as ubiquitously as white scientists are. It's like saying All of those examples are rich, well-educated people who grew up in societies that favored their race heavily (with the exception of Einstein kinda because he was Jewish).Snake Plissken said:Nobody gives a shit about Darwin, Einstein, The Beatles, or Andy Warhol because they were white...people give a shit about them because they're important.
Look, everyone complaining about BHM seems to be forgetting the basic facts, mainly, that African-Americans have made a huge impact on this country's history and that their achievements have been almost universally ignored in today's American school system. A lot of you don't seem to be from America, but I grew up in Idaho, one of the most conservative, bat-shit racist states in the country and if it weren't for BHM a lot of kids wouldn't know a single thing about Frederick Douglass, George Washington Carver, and all those 'classic' examples as well as more modern ones like Molefi Asante, Amiri Baraka, Toni Morrison, etc.
BHM is just an imperfect solution to that problem. Obviously Native-American/Asian/Hispanic history is important and no one is arguing that blacks deserve ontologically more recognition due to their blackness or something. It's just a step in the right direction, trying to respect and acknowledge a group of people who have been systematically ignored and marginalized.