That kind of stuff is fucked up, but if they're just drawings they don't harm anyone, and arguably shouldn't be illegal.
My source was wikipedia so I'll concede the point to you.Steppin Razor said:Wrong. Very, very wrong. Japan still requires 18 years of older for pornography purposes, thus making videos and pictures of real males/females illegal if they are minors.Cheezeypoofs said:Furthermore, Japan's age of consent is 13. The vast majority of what would be considered child pornography is perfectly legal according to Japanese laws, and might not even be considered lolicon.
Well said having taken law and living in Canada, I can tell you that you are right on the money. It should be mentioned that if anything that is considered Child Pornography is brought Canada, you are guilty of a crime for importing. Again, I think it had been said well above that he should have been aware of the laws of the country to which he was travelling, and if in his ignorance he didn't, then it falls on him.ravensheart18 said:Under Canadian law, you are wrong. I've seen a lot of comments like this in the thread that seem to assume Canadian law is the same as what you might have in say, the US. It's not.Atlas13 said:But here's the thing, it's not child porn. Child pornography refers to actual recordings or images of actual children.
Child porn in Canada includes the visual and/or written representation or suggestion of sexual activity or sexuality by persons (real or imaginary) who are, or are depicted as being, under the age of 18 years of age.
So yes, that means you can be arrested for kiddy porn for a text based story with made up characters that never happened. You can be arrested for a porno with an 21 year old porn start who is dressed up and pretending to be a 16 year old. You can be arrested for a drawn image of a suggestive nature where no real kids were involved. You can be arrested without any depictions of actual sex, the images just have to appear to be "sexual in nature".
It's probably one of the most incompassing laws out there.
There is an "artistic merit" exception to the law, but that is an affirmative defense, meaning you have to PROVE to the court that it has broad artistic value before the defense can be introduced.
Convictions specifically for manga images have been upheld right to the Supreme Court.
On the issue of "why did they search this guy", he crossed a border. It is routine to randomly search people at border crossings and when crossing into ANY country it is important for you to know that you generally are considered under most country's laws to have consented to anything up to full body cavity searches when you cross that custom's line. Border guards often have much more authority (and sadly less training) than your average police officer.
Damn I was gonna say this. Except without the example, which I really enjoyed. So I guess it's a good thing you beat me to it.SiegeJack said:In Canada, Loli is defined as CP. This means that one can be arrested for this. It's happened several times, in fact. This is just another example of the "learn the laws of other places before you go, and don't bring porn with you" rule.
So you skimmed my post? Here's what I said:Uriel-238 said:Guess what I just posted. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.297134-Amercian-arrested-for-Child-Porn-by-Canadian-customs-who-found-manga-on-his-computer?page=5#11770497] It applies to this too.
I never said we should pass laws about it yet. I even said that I doubted that a clear link will be found between lolicon and child molestation. What I did say is that we don't know and we should be making an effort to find out.It's an area that is desperately in need of research so we can get a clear picture and take the appropriate steps, whether that be banning or regulating it if there is a proven link, or decriminalising it if the danger, if any, is shown to be miniscule. I doubt that there will be a link found, but the possibility exists and we just. don't. know. And until we do know, laws like the ones in Canada will continue to be passed.
Well, Wikipedia does have it right. The legal age of consent in Japan according to national law is 13. Prefectural law tends to override it, though, so in a lot of places over there the age of consent still is 18.Cheezeypoofs said:My source was wikipedia so I'll concede the point to you.
You laid everything out perfectly my good sir, thank you.Uriel-238 said:*Snip*
As for the laptop issue, a couple of people mentioned it earlier and I gave the long explanation above. For the short explanation, the US started doing it to combat copyright infringement and to exercise the Patriot Act and the Canadian Government was pressured into doing that by the US when the US wouldn't back off the searches.TheLaofKazi said:Hold the fuck on. Why were they allowed to search his laptop? I'm surprised that question isn't being asked.
I honestly don't think the man did anything wrong, whether the manga on his computer was loli or not. If he actually had media on his computer of real child abuse with real children, then I don't think there is a problem. I hate to sound arrogant here, but pretty much every opposing opinion I've heard on this issue is just based out of ignorance and a knee-jerk reaction to fictional child pornography (ewww that's sick and it's wrong!).
Yes, he may have technically broken the law, but one really can't say for sure yet. Child pornography laws and how they apply to fictional content is a pretty controversial and muggy issue.
Well, you took my answer. They don't do that for every electronic that passes through, do they? Must create one hell of a line.Hero in a half shell said:How did they find the stuff on his laptop, that means that the customs guy had to take it, turn it on and hunt through all his files, and he did this just on a whim? I never really fly internationally but doesn't that seem a bit excessive?
I'll have to ask you how much you impact you meant to fall on the "it has been known to be" line, because this seems rather close to a slippery slope argument. If it applies to anyone, I would believe that the person was already mentally unhealthy instead of saying he could no longer be satisfied. Slippery slope arguments are based on exaggerated possibility and tend to unnecessarily demonize a lot of things. This is nothing against you of course and I do note how you also acknowledge the idea that no one is hurt. I just felt that I had to point this out.TCPirate said:It's a tough one... On one hand, they are JUST drawings and there is no intent to cause harm to anybody and no body is harmed.
On the other, it has been known to be a starting point for paedophiles. Not hentai, necessarily, but eventually the fake images will no longer satisfy the person's urges and can lead to real paedophilia.
They do the in-depth searches more frequently at border crossings than in airports. For airports, they usually just make you boot up your laptop to make sure it is either a PC or a Mac and turn on your iPod or cell phone to make sure it isn't a remote for explosives or something. I have Linux on my laptop and I had a lot of explaining to do when my logon screen didn't say 'Windows' when I booted it up at the airport.Et3rnalLegend64 said:Well, you took my answer. They don't do that for every electronic that passes through, do they. Must create one hell of a line.Hero in a half shell said:How did they find the stuff on his laptop, that means that the customs guy had to take it, turn it on and hunt through all his files, and he did this just on a whim? I never really fly internationally but doesn't that seem a bit excessive?
Really? I thought this was what ACTA was going to allow for if it got passed (and to my knowledge it didn't yet).StygianInq said:As for the laptop issue, a couple of people mentioned it earlier and I gave the long explanation above. For the short explanation, the US started doing it to combat copyright infringement and to exercise the Patriot Act and the Canadian Government was pressured into doing that by the US when the US wouldn't back off the searches.
And what I said was that the burden of proof is supposed to be on those who are saying loli is dangerous.Steppin Razor said:I never said we should pass laws about it yet. I even said that I doubted that a clear link will be found between lolicon and child molestation. What I did say is that we don't know and we should be making an effort to find out.
"Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more"Richard Po said:I think this just brings the question of "what is porn"?
Is that like marijuana is known to be a gateway drug to (crack) cocaine and (black tar) heroin? and Cinemax softcore porn is known to be a stepping stone towards hardcore porn which is known to be a stepping stone to street rape?[footnote]Incidentally, Naomi Wolf [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf] rescinded her 20th century statement that porn consumption leads to rape during the Bush era to, instead say porn consumption leads to sexual lethargy, namely that now men rape less, but expect their girlfriends to actually perform in bed, and that it's no longer adequate to merely show up for a date. Indeed, porn consumption has skyrocketed. Violent sex crime has plummeted. Not that they necessarily correlate.[/footnote]TCPirate said:On the other, it has been known to be a starting point for paedophiles. Not hentai, necessarily, but eventually the fake images will no longer satisfy the person's urges and can lead to real paedophilia.