I imagine it might have something to do with the self-righteous tone and implicit assumption that the mistake was from ignorance rather than carelessness.Kurokami said:I have actually posted on this thread.Jaime_Wolf said:I was parodying the title of the thread - thus the title case. If any criticism could be leveled, it would be that the capitalization was inconsistent among the short/function words. Though on the other hand, opinions on proper title casing remain largely divided with no universal standard in virtually any major dialect of written English.Kurokami said:You are only meant to use capitals for the first word of each sentence, proper nouns and the word 'I', including of course I'm, since it is just a contracted 'I am'.Jaime_Wolf said:National Generalizations Based On a Handful of Things You Don't Like are Fucking Idiotic
But back on topic, yes. Generalizations are bad if you present them as fact.
Also, you forgot adjectives derived from proper nouns, numerous brands, days, months, languages, taxa, some common species names, nouns used to denote a class of things when they more commonly refer to a single entity (the Church when refering to all churches at once for instance), acronyms, honorifics, legal terms, and likely a number of other words too.
And certainly you must have better things to do than making unthinking comments about the capitalization of forum posts.
TL;DR: Your attempts at grammar trolling are cute.
Commenting on your grammar, I assumed to be for your own benefit, obviously not if you wrote that way on purpose. I do tend to try to correct people if they have issues with spelling or grammar. Why? Because I think it's silly not to try to educate them. If I have made mistakes in my posts, which I have, I would want them corrected. I also don't particularly understand people wanting to remain ignorant or taking some sort of offence when they are corrected rather than saying "thank you" if they actually learned something.
(PS: Capitalization counts as grammar? I'm never sure of these things)
Moreover, there are a lot of people who would rather "remain ignorant" of the rules of grammar, which makes a lot of sense seeing as how they're mostly already fluent speakers of the language and know all of its actual grammar (in fact, know it more completely and more deeply than any expert is presently capable of understanding). And as you seem to suggest, what you purported to "educate" me on here isn't really grammar so much as it is writing etiquette. And etiquette is very much tied to social groups, so assuming that others should universally hold to the same rules of etiquette is a pretty silly notion. You're not really to blame for that though - people only really get these notions because English grammar instruction is (and popular notions of how language works in general are) so hopelessly outdated.