American Patriotism

Recommended Videos

Andothul

New member
Feb 11, 2010
294
0
0
in before the America bashing begins

America is a great country and it's citizens have every right to be proud and patriotic
just like every other nation.

That being said there is a fine line between love of country and worship of country.
American nationalism while rooted in patriotism is something i don't agree with.

I'm not quite sure what the OP is referring to in Saving Private Ryan but from what Ive seen the only different between American war films and foreign war films is
that American War films tend to romanticize and "hollywood" the conflict
especially the battles
 

Rhiehn

New member
Aug 16, 2010
84
0
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWS-FoXbjVI&feature=related Of course, I'd probably move to Sweden or Japan or something if I spoke Swedish/Japanese, but I like to say I'm at least a little bit proud of my country. Also reading the comments to that video make me sick to my stomach.
 

Lust

New member
Mar 23, 2010
2,437
0
0
Well, it's not that bad......................

Sacman said:
it's just Americas nature, you know, muscle in on other peoples territories, impose our own values and screw everything up... look at what we did to Silent Hill...


Touche, Sacman, touche.
 

skywalkerlion

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,259
0
0
I dunno, I agree with the guy that says there's a difference between nationalism and patriotism. I'm very patriotic because I'm proud of the country from it's very humble beginnings to becoming a superpower. And how awesome the guys that founded this country are. I'm certainly not a nationalist, though. I've always thought about moving to a different country, to try something new.
 

Krythe

New member
Oct 29, 2009
431
0
0
When the french make movies, it's full of Mary-Sue frenchies. Same with german films, russian, british, e.t.c.

America just takes most of the heat for this because most movies are American.

You think your country can do a better job? Boycott Hollywood - bankrupt it. Most Americans with any education to speak of hate hollywood movies just as bad as Euros, so we're not gonna care.
 

Cheery Lunatic

New member
Aug 18, 2009
1,565
0
0
Ok, I do like living in America. So I might be a little patriotic. But there is a thing called "too much" (on both ends of the spectrum here, folks).

However, America reminds me of my dog.
Adorable, and huggable. But also stupid, fat, greedy, and barks at harmless squirrels.
 

Okuu_Fusion

New member
Jul 14, 2010
897
0
0
I'm not that patriotic, but sometimes I do get a feeling of, wow, we're badass... Mostly though, of stuff that happend long ago... Nothing really too patriotic nowadays...

Being patriotic now, is like, for defense... If I'm not, I'm going to be killed...

If America was a sentient being, I doubt it would like getting its ass kissed by all its populous...
 

rt052192

New member
Feb 24, 2010
1,376
0
0
doodger said:
By the way, the soviet union won the second world war, not the americans XD
Now this is comical...I will say that the Soviets did a good job of repelling the Germans from Russia(the Russian winter probably had a greater effect then the Red Army), but let's be serious. You honestly believe that had America not entered the war the Red Army would have been able to eliminate the Germans from North Africa, Italy, Liberate France, get Germany to surrender, and deal with the Japanese in the Pacific? Yeah, I think it's quite comical to think this. The combined efforts of America and the Soviets, not solely one or the other, is what won the second world war.
 

-Samurai-

New member
Oct 8, 2009
2,294
0
0
Saving Private Ryan is an American made film about American soldiers. What else should it feel like? Are British films not so ridiculously "British"? French films not ridiculously "French"?

Why are people of other nations so concerned about the way we view ourselves? I honestly don't get it.

If someone could kindly point me in the direction of a WW2(or any) film that wasn't made in the USA, and accurately and fairly portrays all nations involved in WW2(or all nations that exist), I'd appreciate it. Oh wait. No one made that film.

The same goes for all other media. That includes games.

Irridium said:
The US wasn't the only nation invading Europe after all...
That's absolutely correct, but the film wasn't about the other nations for a reason. Its characters were American. Its story followed American soldiers. That was the entire point of it.
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,077
0
0
I believe that true American patriotism lies in standing up for the Founding Fathers' vision for what this country should be---and opposing the US government at every turn because it has corrupted that vision beyond hope of repair.

My US political views are best summed up as "nuke DC".
 

lukenhiumur

New member
Feb 20, 2010
147
0
0
teh.arkhon said:
However, I found that it was so ridiculously "American" it almost put me off the movie.
I don't see why the American versions always have that overlying American "air."
Imagine that, a movie about American soldiers in WW2 having an American air to it. On a side note, for a movie about American soldiers, Saving Private had a lot more to it than just a bunch of injected patriotism.
 

Sinclair Solutions

New member
Jul 22, 2010
1,611
0
0
Even as an American, our "patriotism" often worries me. I mean, I am fine if we use it to unite in a time of peril like we did after 9/11. That made us closer as a country. But when people use it as an excuse for bigotry, for ignorance, that is what bothers me. Like the people who watch Glenn Beck. Although I would not say Beck is a complete idiot, his patriotic rants should be taken with massive amounts of salt. Yet his hardcore fans are people who take it at its meaning. They use it to segregate and to act like total arrogant fools. They see America as the example of absolute perfection, as if everything we do is perfect, but the other "backwards" countries don't realize it because they do realize our greatness. They do not realize that America is a deeply flawed country who has alienated itself from the rest of the world due to the arrogance of our past leaders (I'm talking people like Truman and Reagan, not Bush) and the ignorance of its people. Sad, but true. Long story short, my views of patriotism are the same with my views of religion: fine when used to unite, a problem when used to divide.

As for our view of WWII, I have always believed Hollywood dramatizes the brave sacrifices of soldiers to appeal to the people I have previously mentioned. The Pacific was a show that showed war the right way: full of valiant men, but made them flawed enough to show that war was not all glory and American pride. There was racism and deep hate. Tom Hanks learned that. Fox News criticized him for portraying it. They called him "un-patriotic." Oh well, what is there to do?
 

crazyguy668

New member
Jul 15, 2009
88
0
0
i agree that nationalism is different than patriotism ,and too much/no patriotism(to the extent of hating your country) are both bad, poatriotism is good. im pretty patriotic, and since america makes most movies, theyre geared to that audience. and we are pretty proud because when we were founded, we won a war that we tottally should of lost and weve won every war except vietnam because of hippies(i hate hippies a lot, i just think of the good of the 50s and patriotism of the 40s that they ruined as well as how theyre kids are fucking idiots now) and since we are the superpower of recent history, and it makes sense that we are very patriotic
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
teh.arkhon said:
So..
Last night I watched Saving Private Ryan - and I thought it was absolutely fantastic.
The opening battle scene (the Normandy landing) was absolutely incredible and got my real hyped up for the rest of the film.
However, I found that it was so ridiculously "American" it almost put me off the movie.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-patriotism, nor am I anti-American, but I don't see why the Americans get so involved with films like these, where as other war films - IE: British films - are much less patriotic in a sense.
I come from New Zealand and I can relate with war tales, especially those where my own countrymen are concerned (I am often deeply moved by stories/ceremonies regarding the landing at ANZAC Cove in WWI etc.) but I don't see why the American versions always have that overlying American "air."

I was just wondering what all the Americans out there thought of this, and what your thoughts on patriotism are.
I hear this all the time, and I can understand the resentment. That is how things always are with the dominant world power. It's sort of like how when The British Empire pretty much ran the world, a lot of the pop culture like the works of Rudyard Kipling were arguably the same way. Not to mention all the stories about British sailors and explorers, and so on and so forth. Geeks nowadays tend to look at the Victorian Era and it's "arrogant Brits" as something exotic and special and don't fully realize that was how the world was at the time in a literal sense, and a lot of people also resented it, especially seeing as they were arguably worse than the US has ever been in terms of imperialism (and ultimatly made a mistake similar to Hitler's, in expanding too fast and spreading too much over too many fronts at the same time). Granted there wasn't the same kind of instant global media then as there is now, so I suppose that does influance perceptions somewhat as well.


What's more the global endgame is approaching. Humanity needs to unify under one goverment if we're going to survive as a species. If nothing else we need to do it in order to efficiently use manpower and resources to get off planet to obtain more resources. A lot of people increasingly realize this even if they don't rationalize it. While a lot of people hate it, the system and principles of the US are the only ones that could really work for humanity as a whole. The dissolution of nations into a world goverment DOES mean that the US will also dissolve. It also means that in the end those same principles and style of governing will amount to Asians running most of the goverment simply by the numbers (largest population) in the long run. The principles and rules mattering more under our system than what someone looks like. The problem of course being that in doing this it means that the history of centuries or thousands of years for some civilizations suddenly becomes trivial. Things like a gloabl language are going to ease communication, but for all the benefits people in the short term are going to resent a long-used language like French becoming a hobby with English (for a lot of reasons beyond the US using it as it's primary language) being taught to everyone in school, and so on. As time goes on people realize that their history will become fringe study, like most things past periods will be condensed and we will be looking at a "late American Era" right before a global unity.

Oh sure, we aren't there yet, though people realize it has to happen soon, the bottom line is that the majority of people are going to be annoyed by whomever is the dominating power and doing the uniting. I think a lot of the resentment of the US comes from the fact that a lot of people realize that there just isn't time left for their own people to rise to dominance and be the ones to unite everything.

As far as an overly American air, I think a lot of people overseas tend to read into that as part of the points above. It's not so much America doing anything to tell people that they "don't matter" or anything, people project that themselves, just as people were resentful of Spain, Britan, or other nations when the world revolved around them. The US is nicer, but there is the whole element of time as well, and I think people realize it on some level even if they don't want to accept it. For America to fall, and someone else to crop up and start over again, and then hopefully get to a place where they can unify the planet, chances are it will also mean we doomed our species since the simple passage of time will have depleted the resources we need to get off planet, and then we can sit around waiting
for the sun to finally go nova.

I could say more on the exact point about unity and why it's nessicary, but this is long enough as it is, and I don't expect people to actually agree with me to the point of going "Gadzooks Therumancer, your absolutly right, I never realized that until you said it".
 

FollowUp

New member
Mar 25, 2010
179
0
0
Honestly, we are a bit overzealous. I agree with the former that nationalism is different, but patriotism can get pretty damn annoying.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
I think after Vietnam America could never have the sort of faith it once had in the quintessential "rightness" of its military endeavors. World War II evokes in a lot of people a sort of nostalgia for sacrifices that were made to defeat evil and liberate the good without a lot of messy uncertainties. The fact is, of course, that even WWII had its share of questionable judgements and moral qualms, on both the large and small scales, but its hard to come down to anything less than that the Nazis were capital-E Evil, deserving of vigrous resistance and violent comeuppance, and that their ultimate defeat might not have saved the soul of the civilized world.

There's also the sense that in some ways America never had to get involved in the war which allows us to pat ourselves on the back that much more. The British were, of course, defending their homeland; the Americans were leaving home and family to selflessly fight against evil (or so we can tell ourselves.) Nothing like pragmatic issues to ruin a good romantic image.
 

Commissar Sae

New member
Nov 13, 2009
983
0
0
rt052192 said:
doodger said:
By the way, the soviet union won the second world war, not the americans XD
Now this is comical...I will say that the Soviets did a good job of repelling the Germans from Russia(the Russian winter probably had a greater effect then the Red Army), but let's be serious. You honestly believe that had America not entered the war the Red Army would have been able to eliminate the Germans from North Africa, Italy, Liberate France, get Germany to surrender, and deal with the Japanese in the Pacific? Yeah, I think it's quite comical to think this. The combined efforts of America and the Soviets, not solely one or the other, is what won the second world war.
ah, need to interject and use this damn BA.

The British did a fair amount of the work in North Africa, Italy fell like a stack of cards as soon as someone showed up with a gun (oversimplified for brevity), France was being defended by 10% of the German army and Canadian and British Forces made up a major part of the D-Day landing. The Soviets and Japanese had a peace treaty that was maintained up until right after the first atomic bomb went off and Russian invaded Manchuria.

The Red Army fought better than msot people give them credit for. Yes they were mainly a conscript army, but the Russian population had been massively taking part in after work activities like parachute training, rifle training and grenade tossing as recreational activities. Combine that with the massive partisan movements in the countryside and resistance movements throughout the reich and the Soviets would ahve won in time without the second front ever being opened.

So in the end Germany would fall, Japan would be untouched but would have devastated most of East Asia. North Africa would probably look pretty much like it does today. France would probably have a lot more Communist influences, since the Red Army would either have kept mowing on into France after Germany fell or would have been their immediate neighbour.

OT: Saving private Ryan is less irritating to me than some other American war movies. U-571 being the biggest pain to me as a historian as it casts Americans as the brave men who captured the enigma device, when in reality they were British.

Patriotism can be OK, it just has to be balanced and we all need to avoid jingoism.
 

Bruin

New member
Aug 16, 2010
340
0
0
teh.arkhon said:
So..
Last night I watched Saving Private Ryan - and I thought it was absolutely fantastic.
The opening battle scene (the Normandy landing) was absolutely incredible and got my real hyped up for the rest of the film.
However, I found that it was so ridiculously "American" it almost put me off the movie.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-patriotism, nor am I anti-American, but I don't see why the Americans get so involved with films like these, where as other war films - IE: British films - are much less patriotic in a sense.
I come from New Zealand and I can relate with war tales, especially those where my own countrymen are concerned (I am often deeply moved by stories/ceremonies regarding the landing at ANZAC Cove in WWI etc.) but I don't see why the American versions always have that overlying American "air."

I was just wondering what all the Americans out there thought of this, and what your thoughts on patriotism are.
Seriously?

People had problems with the movie because of the gore it featured.

"How could you envision that happening to our soldiers?" was an argument I heard from a few folks when the film first came out.

That's because the story is about an American unit of soldiers going to rescue an American soldier to bring him back to America.

"Why is a film about American soldiers so biased towards America?" is like asking why FPS games have bullets.