An element of American military brainwashing?

Recommended Videos

BenzSmoke

New member
Nov 1, 2009
760
0
0
He's (the guy on Urban Dictionary) just an arrogant, ignorant fool. The internet has a lot of those. It's best not to get that worked up about it.
 

Daffy F

New member
Apr 17, 2009
1,713
0
0
Lt_Bromhead said:
Squidden said:
I think he's trolling, and you shouldn't take him seriously. I know that America certainly does not have the best Army in the world, nor the best special ops.
If I was trolling, I wouldn't try to apologise so profusely in the last paragraph...

You missed the point entirely. I wasn't trying to settle who the best soldiers are, I was trying to highlight that US troops seem to have their priorities a little skewed.
YOU missed the point entirely. The guy you just quoted was talking about the guy in the Urbandictionary article.
 

Littlee300

New member
Oct 26, 2009
1,742
0
0
Squidden said:
I think he's trolling, and you shouldn't take him seriously. I know that America certainly does not have the best Army in the world, nor the best special ops.
That is because we are lovers, not fighters.
who needs spec ops when you got nukes ^.^
 

BENZOOKA

This is the most wittiest title
Oct 26, 2009
3,920
0
0
It's Urban Dictionary, for fuck's sake. How can you even take that seriously?

It's like getting mad over the following:
Detroit Red Wings

The best hockey team ever. They could beat your sorry team anyday.
The Detroit Red Wings, are really, really cool.
That's also from the Urban Dictionary. Just to prove an example.
[small]Don't get me wrong, I support The Philadelphia Flyers.[/small]
 

punkrocker27

New member
Mar 24, 2009
418
0
0
1. That's not racist at all.
2. Delta Force actually recruits from the SAS and other groups.
3. You're making this big a deal about a comment from freaking URBAN DICTIONARY? Forget any notions of supposed superiority, it's the inferiority complex you need to be worrying about.
 

ZephrC

Free Cascadia!
Mar 9, 2010
750
0
0
What makes you even think the person who wrote that was in the US military? Sounds like some idiot 12 year old that saw some TV show about Navy SEALs and decided they were the most awesomest thing ever, at least until tomorrow when he sees a TV show on something else.

Seriously though, I spent four years in the US army infantry, and let me tell you that I know for certain that their brainwashing is of very dubious quality. Oh don't get me wrong, they try. They just suck at it.
 

punkrocker27

New member
Mar 24, 2009
418
0
0
The truly unsettling aspect of this post was that you claimed America's special forces should be ranked as weaker than ones in other nations in light of the fact they're all brainwashed, based on the words of one 13 year old wannabe, effectively doing the same you accused him of.
 

Mcface

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,266
0
0
bahumat42 said:
Mcface said:
Squidden said:
I think he's trolling, and you shouldn't take him seriously. I know that America certainly does not have the best Army in the world, nor the best special ops.
We spend 10x the amount of money on our military than the country in second. We do, by far, have the best military in the world, and the most battle tested Super Power in the world. Special Forces are arguable, but none of us really know how good the guys really are. DELTA still doesn't even exist, according to the Army, so there is a ton of shit we don't know about them -AND- the SAS.

But standard conventional army, the US has the best army. And yes, I am from the US, but i also research and am very interested in military from all countries.
you have the biggest army
so the section of it which happens to be "the best of the best" happens to be larger.
similar to how just by sheer volume of numbers china has more potentially genius level individuals.

but i wouldn't count them better than spetnaz or even the Gurkha's (which oddly haven't been mentioned yet.

"If a man says he is not afraid of dying, he is either lying or is a Gurkha "

^^
bahumat42 said:
Mcface said:
Squidden said:
I think he's trolling, and you shouldn't take him seriously. I know that America certainly does not have the best Army in the world, nor the best special ops.
We spend 10x the amount of money on our military than the country in second. We do, by far, have the best military in the world, and the most battle tested Super Power in the world. Special Forces are arguable, but none of us really know how good the guys really are. DELTA still doesn't even exist, according to the Army, so there is a ton of shit we don't know about them -AND- the SAS.

But standard conventional army, the US has the best army. And yes, I am from the US, but i also research and am very interested in military from all countries.
you have the biggest army
so the section of it which happens to be "the best of the best" happens to be larger.
similar to how just by sheer volume of numbers china has more potentially genius level individuals.

but i wouldn't count them better than spetnaz or even the Gurkha's (which oddly haven't been mentioned yet.

"If a man says he is not afraid of dying, he is either lying or is a Gurkha "

^^
Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130d
 

Count Igor

New member
May 5, 2010
1,782
0
0
Mcface said:
Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130d
Sorry to butt in on your argument here, but..
Don't a lot of countries?
Missiles and such like :D
But yeah, by 'Best', you mean you have more money available for them and larger numbers than other armies. So yes, the army in the U.S in the best. But you have to admit, the soldier's aren't.

OT: As said by his name, he wants to hype himself up for when he tries (And fails, likely) to get into the SEAL's, by refusing to believe that anyone's better than them.
 

Mcface

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,266
0
0
Count Igor said:
Mcface said:
Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130d
Sorry to butt in on your argument here, but..
Don't a lot of countries?
Missiles and such like :D
But yeah, by 'Best', you mean you have more money available for them and larger numbers than other armies. So yes, the army in the U.S in the best. But you have to admit, the soldier's aren't.

OT: As said by his name, he wants to hype himself up for when he tries (And fails, likely) to get into the SEAL's, by refusing to believe that anyone's better than them.
I can't really admit to something that I don't know is true.. super powers have never fought each other after WW2. But just looking at battles between insurgents and smaller armies, it's hard to say. The US destroyed the Iraqi army in 91 and 2002. The latter only taking 2 months to destroy all of their tanks, aircraft and barracks. Russia fought Georgia, who were a bit smaller, but still had good conventional equipment, and also wrecked them.

(oh yeah edit: i wasn't really talking missiles, we all have those :p i just meant more anti-personal weapons. Apaches, Longbow, Subs, AC-130S, etc)
 
May 5, 2010
4,831
0
0
So what, because some doucebag on Urban Dictionary (who probably didn't put NEARLY as much thought into his words as you did) said that America is better then Britain, that somehow reflects on the state of the entire American Military complex?
 

Wyes

New member
Aug 1, 2009
514
0
0
Count Igor said:
So yes, the army in the U.S in the best. But you have to admit, the soldier's aren't.
A friend of a friend (so already we're seeing a lack of reliability in this source) is in the Australian Army, and apparently did some training ops with US forces. I don't remember exactly what they were, I highly doubt they were Spec Ops or anything like that, but apparently his main observation was along the lines of;
"The Americans are very smart. They have a great military, because they've made it so that any idiot who can hold a gun can be a soldier." (this is paraphrased from what my friend had to say about what his friend said, so yeah...)
Apparently this comment came after a training exercise where they were told to hold a ridge and exercise fire control, because the nearest supply of ammo was at the bottom of a cliff or something. Supposedly the US troops opened up with everything they had in the first 30 seconds and then started screaming at the Aussies for more ammo. Couldn't tell you if this is at all representative (or even entirely true), I just think it's a funny anecdote.

But as many people have said before, when it comes down to it every country with its fair share of nationalism is going to think that it's the best and that its Spec Ops can fuck up every other Spec Ops. Is it true? Probably not. Could any member of pretty much any of these Spec Ops units fuck any of us regular folk up without trying? Most likely.
 

370999

New member
May 17, 2010
1,107
0
0
bahumat42 said:
370999 said:
Palademon said:
Once on a chat room an American pointed me out saying he hates me because I'm british because of our supposed attitude of thinking we're the best. I then pointed out how that's what we believe the stereotype for America is. He then responded saying "Yeah, that's because we are."
And I've had British people honestly believe that England could defeat the US in a conventional war. Idiots are everywhere and one individual does not tar a nation.

Urban dictionary is a joke, the US militry is not run by Lex Luthor.
we couldnt but we would put more of a dent in your forces than you would expect. The fact we are a small island gives us a massive advantage in such a scenario (assuming france is netural to the war and not letting you steal the tunnel).
I'm not American. england would lose though, the point ebing that all nations produce idiotic bravado. I'm Irish and there are people I know who honestly believe that the Irish army could stop the British army from winning a contemporary war in Ireland.
 

Mcface

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,266
0
0
bahumat42 said:
Mcface said:
Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130d
yeah but this is the soldiers not the weaponry. (and realistically ac-130's cannot be used all that often due to needing massive air clearance and not be in civilian areas). Soldier for soldier your not stronger is my point. And having better weaponry is not a bragging point it just means your government cares more about killing people than setting up a working healthcare system.[/quote]

Uh, and whose are? You arent making sense, infantry? marines? Air Cav? Spec ops? who are you talking about?
 

Lt_Bromhead

New member
Dec 14, 2008
330
0
0
Crap, this has started to get out of hand.

I'll just re-iterate that I wish we could forget the urbandictionary thing. I was just relaying where I got the comment from. It could have been facebook, television, carrier pigeon, whatever. That's not important.

I should have phrased the whole thing as a question - is this sort of thing apparent in and around the US military?
That's pretty much what I was trying to get at and I have NO idea why I didn't just ask that in the first place. Pretty stupid.

Oh, and;
Mcface said:
bahumat42 said:
Mcface said:
Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130d
yeah but this is the soldiers not the weaponry. (and realistically ac-130's cannot be used all that often due to needing massive air clearance and not be in civilian areas). Soldier for soldier your not stronger is my point. And having better weaponry is not a bragging point it just means your government cares more about killing people than setting up a working healthcare system.
Uh, and whose are? You arent making sense, infantry? marines? Air Cav? Spec ops? who are you talking about?[/quote]

Yes - he is making sense.
Soldier to soldier. Basic infantryman to basic infantryman. British, US, Russian, whatever.

And if you're mentioning AC130s, don't forget to mention the massive cost (monetary) to fire just a couple of rockets out of one of those things...!
 
Sep 9, 2010
1,597
0
0
manythings said:
Everyone knows the Israelis are best, that Krav Naga shit is INSANE.

Also all military training is a form of brainwashing from bootcamp to advanced training to field command exercises, it's designed to make you think in a way that makes you receptive to taking orders.
This to the word. Also MOSSAD FTW! Compared to the Mossad the CIA, FBI, NSA, and any other (american) letters put together are ametures. And the "brainwashing" is much worse some other countries. The Spetznaz are trained to ignore pain. That's literaly brainwashing. And ever sonce the begining of time the commander has said jump and the tropps have answered "How high?" that is brain washing as well.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
probably. Maybe not brainwashing really, but a breaking downa nd rebuilding. but thats part of any military. I mean, what takes young men who dont want to kill and turns them into killing machines at the orders of superiors.

So yeah, the guy was probably trolling. but dont think its just American military. its any military in the world.