YOU missed the point entirely. The guy you just quoted was talking about the guy in the Urbandictionary article.Lt_Bromhead said:If I was trolling, I wouldn't try to apologise so profusely in the last paragraph...Squidden said:I think he's trolling, and you shouldn't take him seriously. I know that America certainly does not have the best Army in the world, nor the best special ops.
You missed the point entirely. I wasn't trying to settle who the best soldiers are, I was trying to highlight that US troops seem to have their priorities a little skewed.
That is because we are lovers, not fighters.Squidden said:I think he's trolling, and you shouldn't take him seriously. I know that America certainly does not have the best Army in the world, nor the best special ops.
That's also from the Urban Dictionary. Just to prove an example.Detroit Red Wings
The best hockey team ever. They could beat your sorry team anyday.
The Detroit Red Wings, are really, really cool.
bahumat42 said:you have the biggest armyMcface said:We spend 10x the amount of money on our military than the country in second. We do, by far, have the best military in the world, and the most battle tested Super Power in the world. Special Forces are arguable, but none of us really know how good the guys really are. DELTA still doesn't even exist, according to the Army, so there is a ton of shit we don't know about them -AND- the SAS.Squidden said:I think he's trolling, and you shouldn't take him seriously. I know that America certainly does not have the best Army in the world, nor the best special ops.
But standard conventional army, the US has the best army. And yes, I am from the US, but i also research and am very interested in military from all countries.
so the section of it which happens to be "the best of the best" happens to be larger.
similar to how just by sheer volume of numbers china has more potentially genius level individuals.
but i wouldn't count them better than spetnaz or even the Gurkha's (which oddly haven't been mentioned yet.
"If a man says he is not afraid of dying, he is either lying or is a Gurkha "
^^
Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130dbahumat42 said:you have the biggest armyMcface said:We spend 10x the amount of money on our military than the country in second. We do, by far, have the best military in the world, and the most battle tested Super Power in the world. Special Forces are arguable, but none of us really know how good the guys really are. DELTA still doesn't even exist, according to the Army, so there is a ton of shit we don't know about them -AND- the SAS.Squidden said:I think he's trolling, and you shouldn't take him seriously. I know that America certainly does not have the best Army in the world, nor the best special ops.
But standard conventional army, the US has the best army. And yes, I am from the US, but i also research and am very interested in military from all countries.
so the section of it which happens to be "the best of the best" happens to be larger.
similar to how just by sheer volume of numbers china has more potentially genius level individuals.
but i wouldn't count them better than spetnaz or even the Gurkha's (which oddly haven't been mentioned yet.
"If a man says he is not afraid of dying, he is either lying or is a Gurkha "
^^
Sorry to butt in on your argument here, but..Mcface said:Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130d
I can't really admit to something that I don't know is true.. super powers have never fought each other after WW2. But just looking at battles between insurgents and smaller armies, it's hard to say. The US destroyed the Iraqi army in 91 and 2002. The latter only taking 2 months to destroy all of their tanks, aircraft and barracks. Russia fought Georgia, who were a bit smaller, but still had good conventional equipment, and also wrecked them.Count Igor said:Sorry to butt in on your argument here, but..Mcface said:Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130d
Don't a lot of countries?
Missiles and such like
But yeah, by 'Best', you mean you have more money available for them and larger numbers than other armies. So yes, the army in the U.S in the best. But you have to admit, the soldier's aren't.
OT: As said by his name, he wants to hype himself up for when he tries (And fails, likely) to get into the SEAL's, by refusing to believe that anyone's better than them.
A friend of a friend (so already we're seeing a lack of reliability in this source) is in the Australian Army, and apparently did some training ops with US forces. I don't remember exactly what they were, I highly doubt they were Spec Ops or anything like that, but apparently his main observation was along the lines of;Count Igor said:So yes, the army in the U.S in the best. But you have to admit, the soldier's aren't.
I'm not American. england would lose though, the point ebing that all nations produce idiotic bravado. I'm Irish and there are people I know who honestly believe that the Irish army could stop the British army from winning a contemporary war in Ireland.bahumat42 said:we couldnt but we would put more of a dent in your forces than you would expect. The fact we are a small island gives us a massive advantage in such a scenario (assuming france is netural to the war and not letting you steal the tunnel).370999 said:And I've had British people honestly believe that England could defeat the US in a conventional war. Idiots are everywhere and one individual does not tar a nation.Palademon said:Once on a chat room an American pointed me out saying he hates me because I'm british because of our supposed attitude of thinking we're the best. I then pointed out how that's what we believe the stereotype for America is. He then responded saying "Yeah, that's because we are."
Urban dictionary is a joke, the US militry is not run by Lex Luthor.
yeah but this is the soldiers not the weaponry. (and realistically ac-130's cannot be used all that often due to needing massive air clearance and not be in civilian areas). Soldier for soldier your not stronger is my point. And having better weaponry is not a bragging point it just means your government cares more about killing people than setting up a working healthcare system.[/quote]bahumat42 said:Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130dMcface said:snip
Uh, and whose are? You arent making sense, infantry? marines? Air Cav? Spec ops? who are you talking about?[/quote]Mcface said:yeah but this is the soldiers not the weaponry. (and realistically ac-130's cannot be used all that often due to needing massive air clearance and not be in civilian areas). Soldier for soldier your not stronger is my point. And having better weaponry is not a bragging point it just means your government cares more about killing people than setting up a working healthcare system.bahumat42 said:Seeing as we have weapons that can kill an entire group of men, controlled by a guy a thousand miles away in another country.. im going to have to disagree. And you want to go with Spetsnaz card, ok, yeah they are pretty bad ass. But Russia's army is made up of conscripts, young men forced into the army to fight. I don't think its any secret what would happen if a bunch of kids forced into fighting suddenly started getting AC-130dMcface said:snip
This to the word. Also MOSSAD FTW! Compared to the Mossad the CIA, FBI, NSA, and any other (american) letters put together are ametures. And the "brainwashing" is much worse some other countries. The Spetznaz are trained to ignore pain. That's literaly brainwashing. And ever sonce the begining of time the commander has said jump and the tropps have answered "How high?" that is brain washing as well.manythings said:Everyone knows the Israelis are best, that Krav Naga shit is INSANE.
Also all military training is a form of brainwashing from bootcamp to advanced training to field command exercises, it's designed to make you think in a way that makes you receptive to taking orders.