I don't know if it has been stated already, but I saw some interesting arguments pro-piracy lately, from some independent dutch study.
one argument states that most of the enternainment products people (illegaly) dowload, come from overseas, in most cases the usa. When people would normally buy those products, they would not have much money left for entertainment products of their own the countries' making, so pirating enables the consumer to give new bands (or independent games, movies...) a chance, who aren't famous enough to be pirated (or just psychologically are given more respect by the consumers). It also makes more money stay in the country, instead of a flow of money to the exporting country, in most cases, that is the USA.
now, for people in the USA this doesn't mean anything ofcourse (except for the 'give rising talent a fair chance' argument), as pirating damages the entertainment industry, meaning jobs might be lost (altough I thing most of those corporations find pirating only a marginal damage to their profit). Now the argument goes that, if people spend less on a, more unproductive branch of industry, .i.e. entertainment industry, people will spend more money on other branches of industry, who can be labled more productive, such as housing, furniture, give more money to charity...Etc. Which means that those jobs who would be lost by pirating, are being nullified by new jobs created by a rising demand in other products.
I thought these arguments pretty strong, any thoughts?