Android Spouses or Real Human Spouses: Which do you Prefer?

Recommended Videos

Light 086

New member
Feb 10, 2011
302
0
0
thiosk said:
Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.

But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.

Admit it.
NO!!! I would never do that...

well maybe a little...

okay I admit it, I would. Happy now?

On Topic:
Why not? Androids would be great for sexual adventures. Can be programmed to try anything, can't have children, and won't get STD's (if designed in such a manner).

I might put myself in an android body and design it not to age or get sick.

Off Topic:
This remind anyone one of Armitage?
 

DasDestroyer

New member
Apr 3, 2010
1,330
0
0
I'd choose human, but if you were to give me the choice to be a human or an android - I would be android all the way.
 

iDoom46

New member
Dec 31, 2010
268
0
0
Real human, hands down.
The simple fact that you have to FIND the right person for you and learning all about them is part of what makes falling in love so special, I think. It gets kind of ruined when you are making the person and you, therefore already know everything there is to know about them.

Aside from all that, there's also the fact that you'd age but they'd stay the same, which is a haunting, and kind of creepy thought.

Plus, androids don't really exist anyway.
 

Zaik

New member
Jul 20, 2009
2,077
0
0
Android spouse, with a remote that has a mute button, and also an off switch.

If it came down to some sort of needing to propagate the species to survive deal i'd just donate some sperm to a sperm bank, not really an incredibly difficult to comprehend concept.
 

Paksenarrion

New member
Mar 13, 2009
2,911
0
0
Predictability can be solved if the android's OS is Windows 7. Just surf online until you get a virus and wait for the results.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
thiosk said:
Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.

But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.

Admit it.
No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.

Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
 

Verlander

New member
Apr 22, 2010
2,449
0
0
Flaws and illogical emotional responses are interesting and the true structure of character. I'm not sure I could like someone who would choose a programmable spouse, the attitude behind it is a bit... shifty...
 

Hoplon

Jabbering Fool
Mar 31, 2010
1,839
0
0
FalloutJack said:
thiosk said:
Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.

But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.

Admit it.
No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.

Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
some one needs to read the Op...

They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Dom Kebbell said:
FalloutJack said:
thiosk said:
Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.

But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.

Admit it.
No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.

Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
some one needs to read the Op...

They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
Oh, please go read Blade Runner again. They really don't.
 

Hoplon

Jabbering Fool
Mar 31, 2010
1,839
0
0
FalloutJack said:
Dom Kebbell said:
FalloutJack said:
thiosk said:
Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.

But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.

Admit it.
No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.

Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
some one needs to read the Op...

They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
Oh, please go read Blade Runner again. They really don't.
What does a work of fiction have to do with hypothetical digital computer technology?

The human brain, the closest we have to a UTM, produced conscious beings. On that logic anything that machine that qualifies as one is going to able to simulate it to the point that it would pass the Turing test, rendering the difference moot.
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
RAKtheUndead said:
Iron Lightning said:
Real girls, on the other hand, are almost randomly generated and with roughly 3.5 billion of them it's statistically likely that at least one real girl is now or will become a perfect companion for me. However, it's extremely unlikely that I will ever meet my hypothetical perfect companion. Still, my perfect companion probably exists as a real girl and probably can not exist as an android, therefore real girls are superior companions to androids.
The extreme statistical unlikeliness - ultimately approaching zero - of any female even being an optimal companion for me, or in fact, even any sort of agreeable companion at all leads me to believe that the correct answer here is "neither".
In most cases you'd be right. My point was that while the virtue of being a perfect companion is extremely unlikely in humans, it is impossible for the virtue to exist in an android. Therefore humans are superior to androids as companions for other humans when such unlikely things occur. Although androids generally make for higher quality mates. So on further reflection it is more likely to obtain the highest quality mate as an android rather than a human.

This thread was partially inspired by Nine Planets Without Intelligent Life [http://www.bohemiandrive.com/comics/npwil/].
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Dom Kebbell said:
FalloutJack said:
Dom Kebbell said:
FalloutJack said:
thiosk said:
Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.

But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.

Admit it.
No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.

Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
some one needs to read the Op...

They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
Oh, please go read Blade Runner again. They really don't.
What does a work of fiction have to do with hypothetical digital computer technology?

The human brain, the closest we have to a UTM, produced conscious beings. On that logic anything that machine that qualifies as one is going to able to simulate it to the point that it would pass the Turing test, rendering the difference moot.
Well, hypothetical digital computer technology basically IS fiction. They're both not real. You see where I'm going with this? He made reference to the Nexus-6, which is a Blade Runner thing, so the idea is that we are indeed talking fiction as much as hypotheticals, hand in hand. I, in turn, made a humorous comment involving Ghost in the Shell, which proves the dangers of android relations in that if something were to go wrong, you could be ripped apart because it does not pass as a human mind in truth.

Of course, I made the whole comment as a one-off, but here you are asking me to explain the joke.
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
Iron Lightning said:
Jegsimmons said:
are you same guy who made that "Real or anime" thread?
Nope, that was Christian Fernandez.
seriously people, go human, i know we're nerds but lets not let people think that.

though im not sure if i should talk, i have (non-sexual) interest in centaurs
You know you could totally make it a centaur.
good point, but i'm going to rely on the grey zebra which has the same number of chromosomes as humans, and then cross breeding other bipedal species.....then without warning, I WILL TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH MY LOYAL CENTAUR FOLLOWERS!!!! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

(wow i have problems)
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
Dom Kebbell said:
FalloutJack said:
Dom Kebbell said:
FalloutJack said:
thiosk said:
Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.

But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.

Admit it.
No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.

Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
some one needs to read the Op...

They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
Oh, please go read Blade Runner again. They really don't.
What does a work of fiction have to do with hypothetical digital computer technology?

The human brain, the closest we have to a UTM, produced conscious beings. On that logic anything that machine that qualifies as one is going to able to simulate it to the point that it would pass the Turing test, rendering the difference moot.
Agreed, I only used the Blade Runner reference because it most easily described the general sort of android that I wished to refer to in this thread. I believe that the Tyrell corporation only made the androids capable of failing the Turing test as a method of identifying them. Although that begs the question of why they couldn't just have a barcode on their face or something, but now I'm getting off of my own topic, :p.