NO!!! I would never do that...thiosk said:Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.
But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.
Admit it.
No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.thiosk said:Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.
But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.
Admit it.
some one needs to read the Op...FalloutJack said:No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.thiosk said:Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.
But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.
Admit it.
Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
Oh, please go read Blade Runner again. They really don't.Dom Kebbell said:some one needs to read the Op...FalloutJack said:No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.thiosk said:Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.
But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.
Admit it.
Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
What does a work of fiction have to do with hypothetical digital computer technology?FalloutJack said:Oh, please go read Blade Runner again. They really don't.Dom Kebbell said:some one needs to read the Op...FalloutJack said:No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.thiosk said:Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.
But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.
Admit it.
Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
In most cases you'd be right. My point was that while the virtue of being a perfect companion is extremely unlikely in humans, it is impossible for the virtue to exist in an android. Therefore humans are superior to androids as companions for other humans when such unlikely things occur. Although androids generally make for higher quality mates. So on further reflection it is more likely to obtain the highest quality mate as an android rather than a human.RAKtheUndead said:The extreme statistical unlikeliness - ultimately approaching zero - of any female even being an optimal companion for me, or in fact, even any sort of agreeable companion at all leads me to believe that the correct answer here is "neither".Iron Lightning said:Real girls, on the other hand, are almost randomly generated and with roughly 3.5 billion of them it's statistically likely that at least one real girl is now or will become a perfect companion for me. However, it's extremely unlikely that I will ever meet my hypothetical perfect companion. Still, my perfect companion probably exists as a real girl and probably can not exist as an android, therefore real girls are superior companions to androids.
Well, hypothetical digital computer technology basically IS fiction. They're both not real. You see where I'm going with this? He made reference to the Nexus-6, which is a Blade Runner thing, so the idea is that we are indeed talking fiction as much as hypotheticals, hand in hand. I, in turn, made a humorous comment involving Ghost in the Shell, which proves the dangers of android relations in that if something were to go wrong, you could be ripped apart because it does not pass as a human mind in truth.Dom Kebbell said:What does a work of fiction have to do with hypothetical digital computer technology?FalloutJack said:Oh, please go read Blade Runner again. They really don't.Dom Kebbell said:some one needs to read the Op...FalloutJack said:No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.thiosk said:Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.
But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.
Admit it.
Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
The human brain, the closest we have to a UTM, produced conscious beings. On that logic anything that machine that qualifies as one is going to able to simulate it to the point that it would pass the Turing test, rendering the difference moot.
good point, but i'm going to rely on the grey zebra which has the same number of chromosomes as humans, and then cross breeding other bipedal species.....then without warning, I WILL TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH MY LOYAL CENTAUR FOLLOWERS!!!! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!Iron Lightning said:Nope, that was Christian Fernandez.Jegsimmons said:are you same guy who made that "Real or anime" thread?
You know you could totally make it a centaur.seriously people, go human, i know we're nerds but lets not let people think that.
though im not sure if i should talk, i have (non-sexual) interest in centaurs
Agreed, I only used the Blade Runner reference because it most easily described the general sort of android that I wished to refer to in this thread. I believe that the Tyrell corporation only made the androids capable of failing the Turing test as a method of identifying them. Although that begs the question of why they couldn't just have a barcode on their face or something, but now I'm getting off of my own topic,Dom Kebbell said:What does a work of fiction have to do with hypothetical digital computer technology?FalloutJack said:Oh, please go read Blade Runner again. They really don't.Dom Kebbell said:some one needs to read the Op...FalloutJack said:No, I've seen Ghost in the Shell, so no android brothels for me, thanks.thiosk said:Oh, I'll keep my real spouse.
But when technology gets advanced enough, we'll all be going to android brothels.
Admit it.
Also, no android wives. You can't marry what doesn't pass a turing test.
They are UTMs, so would pass the Turing test.
The human brain, the closest we have to a UTM, produced conscious beings. On that logic anything that machine that qualifies as one is going to able to simulate it to the point that it would pass the Turing test, rendering the difference moot.