I get the feeling you mean "doesn't."LogicArmour said:Just because I appreciate dick does mean my tastes or behaviour will be any less masculine than a straight guy.
I get the feeling you mean "doesn't."LogicArmour said:Just because I appreciate dick does mean my tastes or behaviour will be any less masculine than a straight guy.
Well all im saying is maybe they won't know what pan sexual is. I mean now a days every one knows what being bi, lesbain, and gay means. Yet pansexuality isn't quite as known.Cavan said:That's an..unusual way of thinking about the advantages to certain sexuality.enzilewulf said:Well at least with Pansexual you could confuse some bigot religious people and save your self from some of the hate that gets spewed their way.
SillyBear said:Pansexuality seems to be the pretentious man's bisexuality.
Just sayin'.
Thank you good sir. I have rectified this.Jedoro said:I get the feeling you mean "doesn't."
After looking at the wikipedia page, that lovely poster seems about right.LogicArmour said:Righto, just to clarify. The stereotypes I am referring too are
1) LGBT men are all queens
and
2) Pansexuals are actually just Bisexuals; or as one lovely poster put it...
SillyBear said:Pansexuality seems to be the pretentious man's bisexuality.
Just sayin'.
No, I didn't say that. I said pansexuals are pretentious bisexuals. There is a difference.LogicArmour said:Righto, just to clarify. The stereotypes I am referring too are
1) LGBT men are all queens
and
2) Pansexuals are actually just Bisexuals; or as one lovely poster put it...
SillyBear said:Pansexuality seems to be the pretentious man's bisexuality.
Just sayin'.
I care what you think because everyone's opinion deserves consideration and debate (even mine, which is why I started this thread). And for the record. That is a direct quote of you. And I can understand how you aren't directly directly attacking. However, just as I inadvertently called several of my friends dumb fucks (original post, it's beee edited since), you've called me a pretentious bisexual.SillyBear said:No, I didn't say that. I said pansexuals are pretentious bisexuals. There is a difference.LogicArmour said:Righto, just to clarify. The stereotypes I am referring too are
1) LGBT men are all queens
and
2) Pansexuals are actually just Bisexuals; or as one lovely poster put it...
SillyBear said:Pansexuality seems to be the pretentious man's bisexuality.
Just sayin'.
And I don't expect you to agree with me at all. You're someone who labels themselves as a "pansexual". What a load of bullocks.
I call bullshit on anyone who claims that they don't even think about gender. It's like those people who claim that they don't recognise race. Nonsense. We're all a bit racist. We're all a bit sexist. Gender matters. To all of us.
Just because you're a new wave intellectual or someone who wants to set themselves apart doesn't mean you get to call your own facts.
And besides, even if I am wrong - even if you are a TRUE pansexual and even is pansexuality is ENTIRELY different to bisexuality, why the fuck do you care what I think? The fact you go out of your way to care so much about it seems to suggest even more to me that it isn't true.
I'm straight. If someone on the internet started saying that I'm not - I wouldn't give a shit. I'd just go fuck the opposite gender and go about my day. It's about having confidence in yourself.
Note, I am not attempting to diss you at all here. I'm just voicing my opinion on the issue. I am not attacking you, and if it comes across as that I apologise.
Except for the large number of gay men who do act like that? It's not about orientation, or even really a stereotype: the kind of gay man who will hang out with vapid, shallow, oversexed women will himself BE vapid and shallow, because people associate with those who have common traits. Sex and the City is a piece of garbage that ought not be viewed by anyone anyway, but you might as well complain about it "stereotyping" women as drunken whores.LogicArmour said:Dear Everybody (especially females),
Sex in the City and other similar, shitty TV show are not an accurate portrayal of how the average LGBT man acts. Just because I appreciate dick does mean my tastes or behaviour will be any less masculine than a straight guy. Please get this through your skulls, it's starting to get on my tits.
On a related note (this time for everyone), Pansexuality is not bisexuality. Stop saying it is. When it gets to the point where I lie about my sexuality for the sake of simplicity, something has gone very wrong.
For those unaware as to what pansexuality is here's a wikipedia article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pansexuality
The more you know people,
David (Pansexual)
P.s. I'm actually in quite a good mood at the moment, just thought I'd give a PSA
So, ranting aside, does anyone else have this problem?
See, this is the reason why people don't believe in pansexuality.LogicArmour said:Dimitriov said:I don't know, I've always thought it sounds like bisexuality with delusions of grandeur, reading the wiki did nothing to change that. But hey, whatever you want to call it is fine by me.Here's the difference in a nutshell (at least how applies to me). Bisexual = attracted to men and women. Pansexual = no specific attraction. Believe it or not there are many people who do not consider themselves male or female.OriginalLadders said:I always try to be as open-minded and considerate of new ideas as possible, and whilst I can appreciate that not everyone who is male and likes a bit of penis will be a "flaming queen" (as amazing as that may seem to some people), I have to agree with Dimitriov; I just can't see how pansexuality is fundamentally any different from bisexuality.
Mr 8Bit here has gotten it. I don't know why people do wish to bring labels with them, since I have seen people who are one sexuality or the other have that 'one exception' or 'this one time with this one guy/girl', why can't we just get the point where we just do whatever we want with whoever we want and not have to sit back, get self-reflexive, and try and cram ourselves into neat little boxes.8-Bit_Jack said:Just fuck who you wanna fuck and don't bring unnecessary terminology into it.
I never said I was special, nor do I shove sexuality into everyones face. That's a rather large assumption to make. I just wish people would stop being shocked when I admit I don't care about interior design, and then saying "but you're bi/gay.". This exact scenario happens quite often. And posting a thread about it doesn't qualify me as an attention whore.Sordak said:stop whining about your sexuality oh youre so special cause of that for fucks sake get over it.
Stop beeing an Attention whore and probably nobody will expect you to act like that. If you wouldnt shove your sexuality in everyones face like you are just doing people wouldnt expect behaviours like that from you cause realy you cant read someones sexuality from their face (or their dong for that matter) if they act like any other person.
Im sorry but this is getting annoying, every day there is a new thread of some homosexual complaining how he is misstreated while shoving his sexuality into everyones face and guess what everyone of them will cite some sexuality they are part of besides just calling it the blatantly obvious.
Because from reading that Wikipedia site is that it is, as a "loveley poster" put it the pretentious mans Bisexual.
What is it with Homosexuality lateley? Since when does it turn you Black?
Just to clarify this statement: just for posting youre homosexual people will always go how they respect you and how they feel guilty about stuff.
Homosexuals like to say themsleves that Heterosexuals should accept them in their society but STILL there are a few, and im not saying all here, i say a few, a few such as the OP who think they must shove their sexuality into everyones face and awaite the praising comments.
i mean come on.