As already mentioned "I could care less". BUT THAT MEANS YOU DO IN FACT CARE! Just add an n't and it'd be right!
Actually it means "not without regard for." Cancel out the two negatives, and irregardless = with regards to. So it's even worse than useless: it's often the opposite of what people intend for it to mean.drbarno said:Irregardless.
The word is useless, the shorter version means exactly the same thing, it's used by people who try and sound smarter.
You should ask if they can sneak out quietly.thedeathscythe said:I actually hate it when people type to you and say "I'm not aloud to go out tonight, sorry." It just pains me to see the english language bastardized so badly these days.
I'd still hold that a diabetic getting run over by a truck full of insulin would be ironic. Words aren't said, but the outcome (killing a diabetic man) is different than the obvious intended result of a shipment of insulin. This definition is limited because it only takes linguistic irony into account.AjimboB said:
Seriously, I hate it when people don't know the meaning of irony as well.
I think you meant "You should ask them if they can sneak out quitely." Those kind of spelling mistakes, which have all been said, also grind my gears.ThrobbingEgo said:You should ask if they can sneak out quietly.thedeathscythe said:I actually hate it when people type to you and say "I'm not aloud to go out tonight, sorry." It just pains me to see the english language bastardized so badly these days.
Despite what The Oatmeal says, I don't mind when people use "literally" as exaggeration. Think of it as the ultimate in hyperbole - "I was so _____ that this actually happened. No really."floppylobster said:Literally
You know what else grinds my gears? When I can't find the droids I'm looking for!thedeathscythe said:I think you meant "You should ask them if they can sneak out quitely." Those kind of spelling mistakes, which have all been said, also grind my gears.ThrobbingEgo said:You should ask if they can sneak out quietly.thedeathscythe said:I actually hate it when people type to you and say "I'm not aloud to go out tonight, sorry." It just pains me to see the english language bastardized so badly these days.
I have only heard winningest used in Football. Where the Winningest Quarterback of all time was the one who had the most raw wins, independent of losses. It is actually a somewhat worthy distinction, since it doesn't say you have the greatest win percentage, and does bundle a concept into a single word.WaysideMaze said:Is this real? Do people actually use that word?LetoTheTyrant said:Also, although this doesn't quite fit with OT I'm gonna include it anyway.
Winningest.
I'm English, I've never heard that word used, or seen it before today. I sincerely hope I never hear it out loud, it's just awful!
Don't you mean "I hate it WHEN people butcher the English language?" Surely someone you like has at least at one point in their life done some of this butchery. And clearly you can't hate someone until you are aware of the butchery.Hooray Grammar freak thread!!!
"Times'd" instead of "multiplied"
"Versed" as another form of "versus"
and people using "literally" when there is no figurative or alternate form of what they said and they just mean "seriously"
I HATE PEOPLE WHO BUTCHER THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE!!!
^^^ I completely agree with this.interspark said:the word "gay" as an insult. it insults gays, linguists, the speaker's intelligence but not the actual person being insulted
I hate it when irregardless gets used, but the "ir" at the front of the word implies the opposite, making itself redundant, not the same word.drbarno said:Irregardless.
The word is useless, the shorter version means exactly the same thing, it's used by people who try and sound smarter.
Not in the way it's generally used. Most people just use it to mean they couldn't care less without thinking about it. Used properly, there's nothing wrong with the phrase.Gamblerjoe said:Irony for sure!
Sympathy/Empathy (most people have them backwords)
Plethora
"I could care less" is sarcasm.Owyn_Merrilin said:OT: "I could care less" is annoying to me. As has been pointed out a great many times, you could care a great deal, and still be able to care less.
Yeah! I'm fit but definitely not attactive! oh wait.Daystar Clarion said:You know what else I hate? 'Fit', as used to describe someone attractive. No, fit means to be pychisically/mentally able to do something.Sampler said:Love - people through it around all the time when they mean physical attraction or are in lust when it comes to members of the opposite sex; to love somebody you must truly know somebody not just want to pork them as they have nice tits.
It really starts to irk me when applied to physical items, "I love this new Black Ops game" - no you don't, you may like it a great deal but you do not love it, especially if you're on facebook five minutes later bitching about the online bugs.
The main reason for my loathing of the use of love is it cheapens the meaning, when it's tossed about so carelessly then when it's come to be used for it's real reason its meaning is that much less - "I love you" when told to your spouse would probably have more weight if you hadn't minutes earlier said "I'd love a Dominoes right about now".
E.g. "I say, that square peg seems fit for the purpose of going into a square hole".
Not "Omg, that bird was well fit innit!"
[sub]Fucking chavs...[/sub]