Anonymous Hacks FBI and Records Conference Call

Recommended Videos

crazyarms33

New member
Nov 24, 2011
381
0
0
Flames66 said:
Anonymous has my full support. Until recently, they had my partial support as I don't agree with all of their tactics and actions, but since I discovered ACTA I think we need all the help we can get, from whatever source.
The Devil you know is worse than the Devil you don't? I dunno about that. I think that they are becoming increasingly bold. Boldness is not bad in and of itself, but if people want to know why the gov't is cracking down on all that's going on the internet, I feel that you have to look at these hacked systems...the FBI, cyber security firms, the Sony network etc. and realize that its not a joke for the government. It's ridiculously frightening to them, and to a lesser extent myself. I respect Anon for being better with computers then I will ever be, but I just wish sometimes they would leave things alone. Government agencies are prone to lump all people into large categories, especially on the internet. I feel that the attacks aren't helping. But that's just my opinion.
 

TheFrost

New member
Feb 4, 2011
117
0
0
TopazFusion said:
Ah, yes, "hacked".

I love the way the news media throws that word around like confetti.
They didn't hack into the phone call at all. All they did was intercept an unencrypted email message that detailed the usernames and passwords for call participants.

With that information they simply logged into the call. There was no "hacking" involved.

It wasn't because anonymous was clever, rather, the FBI was careless.

source
In retrospect it probably seems like no big deal to just intercept some emails, but sometimes part of being clever is to detect where the "enemy slipped rather than charge in head on.

as for anon bragging afterwards, well as they say; a genius needs an audience. and right now seems like they crave for attention as much, if not more than they crave justice.
 

chiggerwood

Lurker Extrordinaire
May 10, 2009
865
0
0
Flames66 said:
Anonymous has my full support. Until recently, they had my partial support as I don't agree with all of their tactics and actions, but since I discovered ACTA I think we need all the help we can get, from whatever source.
Just remember you make deals with the devil you're gonna get burned. Remember Faust. Aligning with Anonymous may seem like a good idea in these seemingly desperate times, but to think that it would not do the cause of 'keeping the internet free' any harm is foolish, or desperate thinking.

OT: I'm not going to give them any of my support. Yes I find what they did funny, yes it's nice to imagine a flustered agent pulling out his hair, but when all evidence is laid bare as to whether or not we should keep the internet free ask yourselves this: Do I want the actions of Anonymous, AntiSec, and LulzSec presented against me to a room full of old and easily scared men whom have put their trust in the hands of those who work against us, or would I rather earn even the slightest bit of trust and respect even if it is the smallest speck of trust and respect by distancing my selves from the ones who give ammunition to our naysayers? Cheer Anonymous, AntiSec, and LulzSec if you wish, but do so silently, and campaign honestly and vigorously at the top of your lungs.
 

Giftfromme

New member
Nov 3, 2011
555
0
0
CODE-D said:
Can anonymous get rid of...the.. uh "files" the FBI has on me?
Those are imbedded deep in their servers, under multiple folders but also on multiple machines, in fact at least one copy of your "files" is on PCs, MACs, and on a thousand other machines that all host every OS known to man. The files are also backed up every 7 minutes to another location. So the hack would have to last 6 minutes and delete all files, else it was for nothing.

I am sorry to inform you of this information.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Faine said:
http://www.trueactivist.com/anonymous-hacks-fbi-and-records-conference-call/

Pretty much what the title says. Anonymous done did piss off the FBI again. This is considerably more than just taking down their website, however. Perhaps not earth shattering, but still note-worthy. I'm curious as to why they were happy to make it common knowledge that they were capable of this, though. You'd think they wouldn't want to tip the FBI off, so it makes me wonder if they've got far more up their sleeve.

So what do people think? Internet revolutionaries or criminals? Or just trollololol? People can't really claim that they're just script kiddies anymore, right?

Also, in before "this thread again".
TRANSLATION: Anonymous battles the tide of the internet in an effort to remain relevent.

Here's the funny thing about Anon right now. They're riding a slippery slope from the get-go, and generally have bad timing on things. They MIGHT get on the same ticket as piracy, but they don't really pull off the V bit. What are they really? They are...one part "This Vicious Cabaret".

And the patrons and actors too are uncertain if the show is through
And with side-long looks await their cue but the frozen mask just smiles.


That one. That's really all they are. Because they are directionless, pretty much identity-less, and practically leaderless...they are the dancing puppets on a string to the frozen mask they've chosen to be their god. It is the SAME as those people in The Dark Knight dressing up as Batman and taking guns to a drug deal. They might accomplish something, but they are NOT BATMAN. We can at least say that Batman, V, and numerous other emulated characters have their shit together while the ones DOING the emulation do not.

They may get a tip of the hat from Alan Moore himself, but even the creator of V For Vendetta has to admit the ball's been dropped on numerous occasions.
 

Sarah Kerrigan

New member
Jan 17, 2010
2,670
0
0
WanderingFool said:
Sarah Kerrigan said:
I'm not going to say they went too far, seeing as the call was about them, but I'm not going to say this was wrong ether.
IDK, maybe im just not processing it right, but it sounds like you intended to say you dont view Anonymous as either in the right or wrong. Yet im reading your post as you saying they were in the right both ways.

Im I just not reading it right, or was that intended?
I'm on both sides. Sorry if it was confusing.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
Sarah Kerrigan said:
WanderingFool said:
Sarah Kerrigan said:
I'm not going to say they went too far, seeing as the call was about them, but I'm not going to say this was wrong ether.
IDK, maybe im just not processing it right, but it sounds like you intended to say you dont view Anonymous as either in the right or wrong. Yet im reading your post as you saying they were in the right both ways.

Im I just not reading it right, or was that intended?
I'm on both sides. Sorry if it was confusing.
Ah! Thank you for the clarification.