Anonymous Threatens Fox News Over Occupy Wall Street

Recommended Videos

Zack Alklazaris

New member
Oct 6, 2011
1,938
0
0
That video looks rather crappy compared to their other ones. I'm calling fake.
Although I wouldn't mind seeing Fox take a hit, they constantly are bending the truth.
 

SuperSuperSuperGuy

New member
Jun 19, 2010
1,200
0
0
Well, now. This is interesting.

I support Anonymous, personally. I mean in general. They actually try to get things done, although the effectiveness of their methods is questionable. However, shutting down Fox's website for a few hours isn't really going to affect much. Fox is horrible and the propaganda that they spout is even worse. Calling the protesters "filthy, disgusting and dirty" is really rude and inappropriate. Most of them are just normal people trying to change things for the benefit of the less wealthy. However, the inevitable DDOS attack is only going to provoke Fox.
 

Metalix Knightmare

New member
Sep 27, 2007
831
0
0
Aeshi said:
So most of anonymous is planning to be gathered up in one place in person?

Good, now if we just send in a few guys with guns we can finally put these stupid animals down.
Yes. Because the best reaction for a pack of annoying hackers is MASS SLAUGHTER! You are aware that it may even be a completely different group of people using the Anonymous name doing this right? So you'd be killing people who were not even responsible for you ire at the group to begin with!

Also, stupid animals? WTF dude!? Did an anon call you names on 4 chan or something!? They haven't destroyed hospitals! They haven't burned kittens or drowned puppies! They're bored nerds! What could they have possibly done to you to warrant that response?!
 

The Cheshire

New member
May 10, 2011
110
0
0
Metalix Knightmare said:
Aeshi said:
So most of anonymous is planning to be gathered up in one place in person?

Good, now if we just send in a few guys with guns we can finally put these stupid animals down.
Yes. Because the best reaction for a pack of annoying hackers is MASS SLAUGHTER! You are aware that it may even be a completely different group of people using the Anonymous name doing this right? So you'd be killing people who were not even responsible for you ire at the group to begin with!

Also, stupid animals? WTF dude!? Did an anon call you names on 4 chan or something!? They haven't destroyed hospitals! They haven't burned kittens or drowned puppies! They're bored nerds! What could they have possibly done to you to warrant that response?!
This is my personal advice: Don't waste your time typing that just to conmtradict an afirmation as stupid and lousy as the one you just quoted.
 

Spartan448

New member
Apr 2, 2011
539
0
0
I like what Anonomous is doing, but here, they're not doing enough. Fox News AND MSNBC need to go die in a fire.

For good.

We should all follow the Anon's example, and stand up for general American standards, and unity. Seems like this nation is less Republican and Democrat, and more Rich and Poor. For once, the Republicans are right: This IS class warfare, except it's not a war, it's a revolution. the Rich have controlled politics for too long, and now we've entered wars for no reason, brought on the wrath of an entire culture, have a deficit that unless drastic action is take, will likely be the end of us, and we are now more corrupt than ever. There was a time, during Kennedy's presidency, that this nation came together as one, ignoring race or religion or income, and really got stuff done, became the #1 ranked world nation. Now, we're falling behind Third World countries in EDUCATION. We need to bring back the unity of the Kennedy days, and to do that, the Rich can no longer controll the world.
 

gigastrike

New member
Jul 13, 2008
3,112
0
0
I don't get it. Are they actually supporting the protestors or are they just looking for a reason to spite Fox news?
 

arcticphoenix95

New member
Apr 30, 2010
455
0
0
Who decided on the voice filter for the video? OT: I'd root for anonymous on this one, but i doubt hacking the website will do anything to stop fox from slandering the wall street protesters.
 

xXAsherahXx

New member
Apr 8, 2010
1,799
0
0
Oh Anonymous, the lulz you give me just keep going. "We will hackz your site and replace it with fluffy kittens" ....that's an accurate summation right?
 

FFHAuthor

New member
Aug 1, 2010
687
0
0
I find the irony delicious.

"We don't like how you shut out what these protesters are saying just because you don't like it, so we're going to shut out what you're saying because we don't like it!"
 

Agiel7

New member
Sep 5, 2008
184
0
0
Well regardless of how you feel about Anonymous, if they put their minds to it, it's *GONNA* happen.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,314
0
0
ya know I find it odd that none of the "faux news lololol right?" people ever provide examples except for the fact that fox DARES to dissagree with the left (never mind that both the "comedians" and supposed news people on other channels spew just as much or more hate)

OT: the level of stupid hypocracy here is mind blowing, as well as the fact that if the attack happens it will be completely ineffective
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
major_chaos said:
ya know I find it odd that none of the "faux news lololol right?" people ever provide examples except for the fact that fox DARES to dissagree with the left (never mind that both the "comedians" and supposed news people on other channels spew just as much or more hate)

OT: the level of stupid hypocracy here is mind blowing, as well as the fact that if the attack happens it will be completely ineffective
IVE BEEN SAYING THAT FOR MONTHS ON HERE!!!
people hate on fox because it's conservative, not because it's biased. Because if people believed that, they would have to call out all the other news channels to not look bias themselves.
Its like the pot calling the kettle black......or any episode of family guy.
 

Jake0fTrades

New member
Jun 5, 2008
1,295
0
0
So in order to preserve free speech for the Wall Street Protesters they're going to take that right from Fox News? That sounds logical. Seriously though, the Framers didn't come up with Freedom of Speech to protect the opinions of the majority (Wall Street Protesters, Anonymous), they wanted to guarantee freedom of speech for the opinions of the minority (Fox News). I don't like Fox News any more than the next reasonably minded person, but so long as they're just running their mouths and not actually hurting anyone, why should we care?

Didn't they say they were going to hack Facebook too? That didn't happen.
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
LastGreatBlasphemer said:
Anoni Mus said:
To you two and others. Did you know Anonoymous is hacking sucessfully pedophilia sites and finding its users and reporting them to the FBI?
Do you hate them less now?
No. Shooting four kids, then rescuing a puppy, then returning to shooting kids, does not excuse the fact that you're shooting kids.

Being an ineffectual collaboration of retarded script kiddies does not change that status when you only do ONE thing right.

Think about Star Wars. All the villains are committing genocide on a constant basis. But whenever said villain does one good thing, suddenly he's forgiven and is a martyr.

It.Does.Not.Work.Like.That.

If they want to be considered decent people, and above all, an effective group, they need to do more that just DDoS web sites and get some private information from time to time. Not, you know, once in their entire history of being shit bags, do something nice for once. They need to stop hiding behind a faceless collective because it shows they are cowards who aren't willing to risk themselves to do what's right. The mask is their biggest detriment. A faceless collective means anyone who says they are Anon, IS Anon. It's their damn creed. Which means if a child molester says he's Anon, then guess what, Anon allies themselves with child molesters, because there is no one saying they're not. No matter how many videos they put out decrying this man, it could be anyone, with as much credibility as the next guy.

Anonymous are terrible people who are doing nothing to help the world.
that and their are several different anonymous groups at any point, all with separate goals. but the main agenda for any group to be called anonymous should be justice. how ever they have personally decided what justice means.....like if superman suddenly had a sublime socialist under toned agenda and bullied people to his belie- oh wait....action comics reboot.....im sad now.
 

Superior Mind

New member
Feb 9, 2009
1,537
0
0
I have absolutely no love of Fox but I thought the one thing Anon stood for was free speech. Surely if this is their angle they would support Fox's right to say whatever derogatory thing they want about protesters. It's not particularly pleasant but when has Fox been anything less? Considering their stance of "live and let live" with the WBC in respecting that stupid bloody organisation's right to spout misinformed bullshit, why go after Fox for doing the same?

Additionally I've got to say, Anon's lost it's fangs. Their attacks on websites are a minor annoyance, they get a decent amount of press but its all pretty inconsequential.
 

SecretAlienMan

New member
Mar 31, 2010
112
0
0
What these anonymous people need to realize is that free speech is a two way street. Sure, I don't always agree with what Fox says but I'll defend to the death their right to say it.