They have liability for certain things, such as meeting minimum standards for safety. But that still leaves plenty of ways people can kill themselves and others at a concert that the venue has no responsibility for.
Another Incident in Portland
- Thread starter Specter Von Baren
- Start date
Recommended Videos
True. Yet it still corrects @lil devils x 's post regarding how the protests have no responsibility for the deaths.
Workers.
Workers.
Workers.
This demonstrates an appalling lack of knowledge about what you're criticizing-- a has not even heard the phrase 'international socialism' level of appalling.
Haha, no.
Haha you're so deep into this shit.
It would have been appalling had I been a student in the USSR, where a fourth of the curriculum was this garbage.
This isn't a rebuttal. This is a tantrum.
Maybe, but that education was good enough for the state to develop nuclear weapons and power, a world-class space program and competitive military technology.
And if you were born poor, you could also get the best education available in the USSR, unlike the West where elite education is mostly is the preserve of people with tons of daddy's money.
To be fair, that's a both sides thing. When they compile lists of "far-right terrorism", they include questionably related things. For example, a couple once had their infant child die. It was unclear if it was infanticide or just criminal negligence. They abandoned their home with the dead infant left behind. Their crime was discovered, they were arrested. The man had a swastika tattoo, so this ended up in databases of "far-right violence". Those claiming the "Far-right extremists" are major threats don't do anything to distinguish between political violence and unrelated violence.
That's not true.
Soviet higher education was first a place for the learning of Marxism-Leninism theory first and the technical fields second. It put emphasis on exporting the revolution and reserved spots for foreign students from Marxist nations.
Admission into these universities was very difficult, since there were many more applicants than spots available. Applicants would require private tutoring to be able to pass the exams. Often connections of the parents in the party or the administration were required to enter, and bribes were not uncommon.
If you were a peasant-boy from some village you wouldn't have the connections or money to enter a good university, or any university at all.
Source - my family. Both of my parents studied in the USSR's universities.
Last edited:
I don't believe that. Keep moving commie
Sure, I have anecdotal sources too, of two friends who came from "peasant" class and were admitted to specialist schools in the USSR because they showed talent.
I'm sure there was corruption and places were taken by the well-connected undeserving, but at least the access was still there. Doesn't matter if you have the talent, bar a tiny proportion of scholarships, you're not going to private schools and the likes of Harvard unless your parents are flush.
Not sure what you expect a marshmallow fruit salad to do under these circumstances
It's (not actually) weird to see political protests not getting the same leeway sports celebrations get. Like, if somebody loots a convenience store while people are in the streets celebrating a sportsball win, it's downright easy for people to say "well that's not the fault of the happy sportsball people". But a dude gets shot during a robbery a couple miles away from a protest against police brutality and that's definitely connected, I guess
Well I did say Rioters to begin with but you wanted to have them counted as protesters or so it seems
No they are happily ending up providing cover for people to riot and loot.
Protests are protected by rights.
Riots are not
Some people seem to want to equate the two and claim the actions are
USA
Happily? We have seen tons of footage of protesters STOPPING other people from doing bad shit at protests. They followed that " hammer guy" breaking windows around at the protest and chased him out of the area. We have seen protesters intervene in hundreds of these incidents where people were doing bad things so to blame them is seriously messed up tbh. Many of these protests deemed a riot where property was destroyed we still ha d protesters stopping people from doing bad things. Them not being able to stop them all does not suddenly mean the protests are the problem. You re suggesting they should bully protesters into silence by doing bad shit. Besides, if it was that easy to stop protests by just doing something bad, don't you think the cops would be doing a lot of bad shit just to blame the protesters and give them a reason to shut down? Oh.. yea that happened too:
Agent provocateurs: Police at protests all over the country caught destroying property | MR Online
Police all over the world commonly use plants and undercover cops to undermine protests.
mronline.org
Whatever happened to the "you care more about property than black lives!" argument?
When "the right" decries the destruction, looting, and arson, it's "you care more about property..."
When the protesters do it, it's okay.
Damn dude, have you been posting drunk all the other times? You're going to kill yourself.