Saelune said:
Mr.Mattress said:
I was expecting it. Honestly, though, how can the best Video Game movie this year be the Angry Birds movie of all things? Even that is only okay!
MrCalavera said:
Video Game Adaptations were a mistake.
Heres a question though. Is it a bad movie about a video game? Or a bad "video game" movie? Cause I mean, I havent seen it but it seems like as far as adapting the source material goes, its faithful enough. I like that they didnt just do the plot of ACI or II, and made a new character entirely.
And I mean, the plot of the games has been garbage ever since they killed Desmond.
I'd rather just have a good movie, accuracy be damned. I've heard too many times that "Oh, we treat source material with great respect, but also try to make the best movie we can!" only to see neither of those in the final result.
I don't ask for an outstanding accomplishment in cinematography. I would be content with something of a quality of average MCU flick, or a fun action romp like, for example, John Wick.
Being a fan of the medium or franchise doesn't always help, even if you are a good director, as Warcraft movie have proven.
I think writing is the crux, and so far video game movies weren't better in that regard than, well gonna be brutal, most of video games.
But i feel like i drifted away from your question at this point, so here's a review summary that might explain what's the Assassin's Creed problem, as a video game adaptation:
from RT said:
Assassin's Creed is good evidence that sometimes a video game is the better medium than a movie with which to tell a story.