Kahunaburger said:
TrilbyWill said:
Kahunaburger said:
I'd be pretty pissed - that's a massive ethics violation.
in what way? just curious
Creating an intelligent human-animal hybrid is cruel to (and violates the rights of) said hybrid. That's some Island of Dr. Moreau or Fullmetal Alchemist shit, man.
It's worth noting that those are both fictional situations in which the entities involved didn't really have any say in the matter. I would note that first off if something like this were to come about, it would probably work as something which altered the human structure, so there would be no need to involve a living animal. After that, as long as the person involved wanted it, is there really a problem?
I can see how something that allowed people to alter themselves in such a way could have appeal to any number of groups, some more obvious (no need for me to go into details), but some less obvious ones as well. How about construction workers with skin like a rhino to keep them safe on the job, mechanics with the pliable flesh of an octopus to reach tight areas, or safety inspectors with eagles eyes to spot problems which might not be immediately apparent to the rest of us?
Science fiction often serves a somewhat more conservative purpose than many of us realize, and not without some good reasons. It is important to be wary of the power of science, as well as of how that power can change people. But at the same time we shouldn't be, by default, afraid of scientific advancement. Should we? Personally speaking, I think that I would be very excited about the potentials of a science of this nature. Not that I wouldn't be skeptical of it at first, of course. But still, I would try to keep an open mind to its potentials.