Anthropomorphism in Reality

Recommended Videos

Blue_Mage

New member
Dec 31, 2009
1
0
0
Someone asked me if I could be one animal, what would it be? I said eagle and when he asked why I told him it was so that I could finally have sex with eagles.
 

CM156_v1legacy

Revelation 9:6
Mar 23, 2011
3,997
0
0
Durgiun said:
''I'm so gonna pay a furry hooker, get my friend drunk and have him have sex with her.''

My friend is a furry-hater so it would be a laugh riot for me.
Ahah yes. Get someone drunk so they agree to something they would not consent to were they sober. Haha. Oh wait

Also, people often have reasons to be "haters". While I cannot speak for your friend, I can speak for myself and say that I have my reasons.

OT: Couldn't the money on this research be better spend elsewhere? I mean, really. Rather than cure cancer, we're doing THIS?
 

JB1528

New member
Mar 17, 2009
186
0
0
I'm not religious at all. Hell Im an Atheist, and even I find that ethically and morally wrong.
 

Grey_Focks

New member
Jan 12, 2010
1,969
0
0
Wrong for ethics reasons, wrong because it's a waste of time/effort, wrong because it's just stupid? That, and I really just can't see that scientifically being...safe? most animals' life spans are a fraction of our own, so anyone willing to do this would be willingly cutting decades off their lives. And inb4 "hurr durr smoking/drinking same thing". Seriously, a dog's average life-span is 12-14 years. Just thinking about how the hell that'd work is making me dizzy. Then again, I feel like more people here should've read/seen "The Island of Dr. Moreau"

And seriously, why?
 

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
Soldier on in the phlegmatic indifference that always characterizes me when the news of the day doesn't have a direct and tangible impact on my present state of being. Unimaginative and debatably unwise that approach may be, but at least I don't spend my nights up worrying about mass yiffings and Floridian infanticide.

AFTERTHOUGHT: I'd probably buy a few guns, a stockpile of ammunition, and make sure my marksmanship is up to snuff. I can list numerous ways this would backfire horribly, with nigh-cataclysmic consequences.
 

mcpop9

Elite Member
Jan 27, 2010
4,018
0
41
im sorry i have to get this out of me. FUCK YES! ok done if i could i would have a Anthro dragon body built for me and have my brain transplanted into said body. people would hate on me but i wouldn't be touched. whats a human to a 8 ft tall Anthro dragon which could rip you to shreds. Humans are afraid of what they cant control.
also said transplant is possible as the body was created with the help of human cells and we know the human brain is universally accepted by humans so it could work today if we find a way to repair nerves.
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
Kahunaburger said:
I'd be pretty pissed - that's a massive ethics violation.
id have to agree, it would be like cloning, risky and would take many failed attempts to pull it off.

not to say it wouldnt be kinda cool...just a bad idea though.
 

TheDooD

New member
Dec 23, 2010
812
0
0
So basically I can become like Sabertooth from Marvel....Sign me the fuck up right now sir.

Grey_Focks said:
Wrong for ethics reasons, wrong because it's a waste of time/effort, wrong because it's just stupid? That, and I really just can't see that scientifically being...safe? most animals' life spans are a fraction of our own, so anyone willing to do this would be willingly cutting decades off their lives. And inb4 "hurr durr smoking/drinking same thing". Seriously, a dog's average life-span is 12-14 years. Just thinking about how the hell that'd work is making me dizzy. Then again, I feel like more people here should've read/seen "The Island of Dr. Moreau"

And seriously, why?
A dog is a bit too low to be any real good. You'll need apex creatures to make great hybrids like Bears, Wolves, and Lions just to name a few. The lifespans of the hybrids maybe doubled because they have better bone, muscle structure and a much stronger immune system. Heighten vision, hearing, smell. We'll have more control of our bodies. Falling won't break bones as easily, you'll be able to survive harsher weather conditions. Most likely hybrids aren't gonna come from one animal but taking dominant traits from many and splicing them with our own. Fuck up somewhat yes but in the long term it might be needed.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
What, you mean like splicing from Batman Beyond? Well...

AAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
Kahunaburger said:
TrilbyWill said:
Kahunaburger said:
TrilbyWill said:
Kahunaburger said:
I'd be pretty pissed - that's a massive ethics violation.
in what way? just curious
Creating an intelligent human-animal hybrid is cruel to (and violates the rights of) said hybrid. That's some Island of Dr. Moreau or Fullmetal Alchemist shit, man.
thats a chimaera. imagine if we evolved from dog-like creatures instead of monkey-like creatures.
Well, yeah, that's the Island of Dr. Moreau version, and it would be incredibly cruel to the surviving sapient creatures.
wait didnt alien Resurrection kinda do something like this?
yeah that scene where she torches the failures come to mind.
 

CarbonEagle

New member
Apr 19, 2008
136
0
0
Interesting idea. It may be a nessessary reality because it would be more renewable than building machines to do work and constantly mining more out of our planet.

Baradiel said:
As much as I like the idea, it would just create conflict and misery for the anthros. The first few would be kept in labs for their entire lives, to be tested on. If they were ever allowed to leave and integrate into society, it would be hell for them!
I think it would be quiet discomfort. The large mouthed idiots would be mauled by a manbearpig and survival of the fittest would take effect.
 

AugustFall

New member
May 5, 2009
1,110
0
0
TrilbyWill said:
Angel Molina said:
I would react to it by purposing an even better question.... why?

No seriously, what would we gain in the process? I guess other than simply for the sake of science there aren't any practical applications for it...
lets say we get anthropomorphic dogs. instead of having to follow rescue dogs we could just make the anthro dogs the rescue team (if they had human intelligence, which i suppose is a part of anthropomorphism)
So we make something as smart as a human and then force it into servitude saving our lives.

This is a very dark thread.
 

kickyourass

New member
Apr 17, 2010
1,429
0
0
I'd most likely have a one word reaction WHY!? Aren't there a few more important things we could be funding? You know like, that whole AIDS thing? (I guess that was more then one word but you get my point)
 

Coffinshaker

New member
Feb 16, 2011
208
0
0
spartan231490 said:
Why. Just why. There are so many more productive thing for a scientist to be doing.
I believe it was said best as this: "We do what we must because we can"

so why not? science must be done! as for "ethics"... that's a relative term. if we followed everything by the "ethical" book throughout history, we'd pretty much have no understanding of, well, anything. animal testing, human autopsies, human experimentation (especially on college kids and paid with beer), and all that mess... where would we be without it? hell, right now we're still in a big debate over stemcells and the ethics of using them to cure all kinds of things (in theory). give it another 50 years and anthropomorphic procedures will be nothing less ethical than eating baby dolphins (oh right, that's also no big deal in the future... just a heads up).
 

humor_involuntario

New member
Mar 31, 2010
57
0
0
Being a smart bear (or a wolf or dog, you know , the sort of think furries want to be) dosn't make you better in a physiological way, it just makes you different.
for example, a bear can't grab a shotgun and fire at a crowd, it just lacks thumbs, while a man can't hunt with his bare (bear, gedit?) hands, so they use tools to hunt.
Humans are almost always superior to animals, and you can't denay that! (we are the only animal that can extingish more than 30% of the world's species and survive in almost every biome we find ourselves in).
now, an "human-like" inteligent dog could be a usefull creation, but said dog would suffer from the limitations of his body.
now, creating actual anthropomorphic (walks with two legs, has arms, etc...). creature could be a great creation, but still, most animals one could base on are severly liited to a certain biome (that's because of the fur), so I gues that a superor dessign shouldn't be based on fusing animal and man toghether, but by using man's creativity to improve upon man, just like we've been doing for a looong time.