Dynast Brass said:
Politrukk said:
The civil war wasn't even that bad, but then again most people have forgiven the Americans for that little genocide they committed.SNIP
By what measure was the Civil war not, "Even that bad"? More than 1.2 million people lost their lives. Are you going to pretend that because it's not alone in the history of mass slaughter, that it isn't "that bad"?
And keep in mind, this was back when the US population was much, much smaller. There were only 31 million people in the US in 1860.
Fun-fact: In terms of pure military deaths (I'll consider Confederates as Americans since most of them were repatriated after the war), more American soldiers died during the civil war (somewhere between 600,000-800,000 depending on your sources) than in every single war fought after it (including WWI, WWII and Vietnam) combined. That's not even counting the 300,000-400,000 soldiers that survived the war, but were wounded, maimed or crippled in some way.
A war that the Confederacy started by shooting first.
It really was a taste of what was coming for Europe with WWI in a way. Not as extreme, mind you, but the basic elements were the same. You had oldschool Napoleonic tactics being forced up against more modern artillery and guns with much higher rates of fire (breech loading rifles, Gatling guns, etc) by Generals who just did not have the skills to change with the times. It was just a meat-grinder for everyone involved.