geldonyetich said:
Homicidal Hobbes said:
You're certainly free to disagree, but even reading what you wrote here, I'm not convinced.
The problem nevertheless remains that any act of "evil" is perpetuated by those who are clearly ignorant of the true harm they're doing.
You invoked Godwin's Law [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_Law]. However, the holocaust was not perpetuated by Hitler "doing what he felt was right," it was perpetuated by antisemitism. Antisemitism is mere prejudice, an obvious ignorance, and Hitler was a man who had the power to carry it out to the ultimate level. If Hitler was not so very ignorant as to the value of the Jewish people, it seems likely he would not have sought to exterminate them. The same could be said for any race of people and those who loathe them.
To say that "experience" is evil is a half-truth. A person who feels their experiences have driven them to evil is simply unable to cope, trapped in ignorance. However, a person who finds a means to understand the place of their negative experiences in the greater scope of the universe may emerge with a better understanding of life than they started with, and be in a position to do great good.
A "very happy and nice person" is but a skin-deep observation. If they are so very insistent on holding onto beliefs that cannot be verified with reason, they can and will do great harm to this world by attempting to make it something it's not. An evil which is done where you cannot perceive it is, nonetheless, an evil. But then, I'm not going to say that your given example, creationism, is necessarily an ignorance. There is a certain indeterminable line in which evolution may itself be an extension of creation that even science has yet to refute - this is how intelligent Christian Scientists may work.
"Evil" in itself is a fairly ignorant term. You can't put evil in a jar, it's a very generic label that can be applied subjectively to many things.
Yes but you say Hitler was ignorant as to the value of the Jewish people, while I believe he simply had a different value placed on them, their worth to his people. You can't argue that the worth you place on something must be the same for everyone lest it be ignorant, that is entirely subjective. I'm no anti-semite, but I understand his view of things, his reasoning.
Anti-semitism could be, subjectively, called ignorance, but it can be
objectively called the result of life experience - this you cannot deny; Without experience to drive Hitler to anti-semitism, there would be no hatred. There simply is no inbuilt genetic anger towards the jews, it is something that is and always must be learned from some life experience.
I did not say that experience was evil, I said that it was the root of all evil - the place where something begins, where it springs into being, its origins. I would love to see an argument against this. Someone need not experience terrible things to become "evil", it need only be a reinforcement through childhood say, of a hatred against jews by parents or otherwise, that will lead a person to feel only hatred for them. Someone may lose their family, but it will not neccessarily cause them to become a murderer. I am saying however, that certain experiences can mess up someones perceptions for life, like child abuse, sexual abuse and so on may cause strange attitudes to issues in later life.
You misunderstand me, by happy and nice, I mean unobtrusive, well meaning, altruistic etc. I need not list all the good points of a person. They need not force any belief on anyone, but if ignorance is the root of evil, then this person may become a monster against humanity? I don't think so. I think ignorance can cause evil, but I do not think it is the root of ALL evil. I think people can be seen as evil, yet know exactly what they are doing.
I could, in all seriousness prove your entire point wrong right now, by going and shooting my cat - which I know is awfully evil, yet I could still do it because, as an example, I have grown enraged by this conversation and wish nothing more than to unleash my anger by destroying kittens (luckily I am rational and mostly sane). This also adds to my point; I would not have just killed my cat, if I had not had the enraging experience of this conversation. I know more now, and must be less ignorant, yet my cat will tell you that I am more evil all of a sudden.
I do not believe that a person having experienced only happiness and benevolence in others will for no apparent reason turn to some evil act. Therefore I feel it is implied, if you will take my last point as truth, that only someone who has had bad or "value/opinion shaping" experience, can ever become evil and this leads me to conclude that
experience IS the root of all evil, by which I mean the origin of feeling, actions and behaviours that move to inflict upon other beings a removal of freedom, cause of harm or intent of ill will.