Are PCs still really less reliable than consoles?

Recommended Videos

xxcloud417xx

New member
Oct 22, 2008
1,658
0
0
I think it all depends on your hardware. If you have a good PC then you should have no big problems, and if you have a stable console then you shouldn't have any big problems with that either. But it's also an issue of how you take care of your stuff. I'd also like to point out that the OP is right, you are doing alot more different tasks with your PC than with a console, so really I would rely more on my PC than a console...
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
The answer is not really all that cut and dry.

Most of the problems a PC user faces are self-inflicted and can be prevented or easily overcome with a bit of knowledge. Most of the problems a console user faces require advanced degrees in electrical engineering to overcome (or a call to the manufacturer if you're in a hurry).

Really, the biggest issues with PC's and games are hardware compatibility and cost. There were many times, especially as separate video cards became commonplace that I would have to stuggle for hours if not days trying to get a game to work correctly (most notably, Unreal). Cost is the biggest issue though it seems. Sure, console games might not look quite as good as a PC game, the simple fact that you can have an incredibly similar experience on a console as you can have on a PC is enough to make many former PC gamers throw in their lot with the unwashed masses that call consoles home. Why spend thousands of dollars on a computer to play a newest, shiniest FPS games when you're almost certain to have the same game on a console at a tiny fraction of the cost? And the worst part is, it seems the trend is worsening. A decade ago, a standard home computer could be expected to play most games produced around the same time as the computer. Now, you can dump cash into a computer that's well suited to running MS Office and playing solitaire, and woefully underpowered when you try to play modern games. Look at Crysis - if you wanted to get the graphics promised in all the literature (and let's be honest, graphics were the ONLY thing the game was really promising in it's ads) you had to possess bleeding edge hardware when the game was released. Even now, many months after it's release it still takes a substantial investment in computer hardware to run the game at it's maximum settings.
 

kmg90

New member
Jan 21, 2009
78
0
0
Joeshie said:
Eggo said:
The thing with GTA IV is that it's massively CPU and GPU-VRAM limited. I bet all you suckers who bought a dual core instead of a similarly priced quadcore aren't laughing now, eh?
No, I think that we are all face-palming that Rockstar can't optimize for PC worth a shit anymore. I mean, it's not like the graphics in GTA4 are even that impressive.
Its not really the graphics that are require very high-end hardware its more because of the advanced euphoria physics engine
 

Credge

New member
Apr 12, 2008
1,042
0
0
PedroSteckecilo said:
they used to be, but no longer
The only time they ever were was in the days of ME, and past that, 95, past that DOS. Everything else, in between and thus far, has been just fine.
 

johnman

New member
Oct 14, 2008
2,915
0
0
I love my Pc. To the best of my knowledge it is extremly unlikely that there is a setup exactly the same, therefore it is mine and not some bland white box that can be found in most peoples living room. Its now a year and half old and the only problem ive had wiht it was a big piece of crap managed to get up the wire block that delivers the switches and LED's to the front of my case. I blow on it problem sloved. If that happend on a console id would have to send it off. Also with PC there is the huge satisfaction of fixing it yourself, and mouse and keyboard cant be beat.
Crysis warhead on high 40 - 50 fps easy.
 

RRilef

Dangerfield Newby
Jan 5, 2009
319
0
0
Ive had my new computer for about a year and have had only one full on system crash, caused by me not knowing Vista and all its security protocols. My friend on the other hand has sent his 360 in for repairs during that time. I spent 1 hour fixing my computer, he spent 4 weeks waiting for his. I'd say computers are getting more reliable.

As far as in game crashes go, the only game to crash for me is fallout 3, and with how many mods I have running, its not too much of a surprise. But after the recent patch, the crashes have almost stopped. Gears of War freezes my friends 360 at least once every time I'm over his house.

I'd say computers are starting to get a little more reliable, and consoles well they are starting to a lot less reliable.
 

000_00_00_00

New member
Jan 13, 2009
14
0
0
Are consoles more reliable than pcs? Short answer - No. Just look at their failure rates.

Are developers able to produce more stablized products on closed environment which as console, No, just look at Fallout 3.

Each has their ups and down but neither are more reliable than the other. Consoles are just too bloody limited in their duties to even be comparable to PCs. Its like comparing a single ant (console) to a colony of ants (pcs).
 

Izerous

New member
Dec 15, 2008
202
0
0
Liquid cooled phenom 9600BE (oc'ed).
Dual Liquid cooled 8800GTS's (oc'ed).
Liquid Cooled 1200W PSU.
2TB of storage space and 2x striped raptor drives (2x150GB).
Running on Vista Ultimate
With WINAMP ORB I can play any media from my PC to my PS3 or PSP (remote play through ps3).
Also have a smaller server made from spare parts.
And 2 laptops 1 for work and one i had from school i gave my girlfriend.

All of the above and I don't have a single reliability issue with any of them. The only technical issues I run into are with other peoples machines as they ask me to fix them. It's all about the user at the keyboard/controller.
 

Moloch-De

New member
Apr 10, 2008
92
0
0
So the Question most people switch to is: "Which is easier broken?"
That is a onesided question and the Pc has no chance.

Reliabilety? My Pc does realy well and it is so old i have moved with it twice (and a whole lot of other times to lan partys). It is no state of the Art with its original components and i won't try Far Cry 2 on it but there are other new games in production that my hardware won't be afrait of (Diablo3, Starcraft2, Half-Life Episode 3) so i guess if you are no elitist than non-optional-upgrading of a Pc is more of a myth.