You can go 'it's their choice' all you want. But if they are letting other people 'suffer' under their habits and that's were I draw the line in the 'it's my choice' section.
For many people, it relaxes them and makes them feel cathartic. Not every smoker is an addict. They may like the smell and they may like the oral Freudian feeling.Blablahb said:Hold on, that's not a valid comparison. Smoking doesn't make you feel good. Once you're addicted, not smoking makes you feel bad and agitated, and smoking stops that momentarily.Fanta Grape said:"I don't know why people smoke."
A common phrase uttered by the befuddled outsider with a simple answer. Because it makes them feel good. We don't shun people for having eating fast food but we do shun this sort of behaviour? Ridiculous. As long as it doesn't affect anyone else, I'm fine with it.
That's quite different from junkfood, which triggers some chemical reactions that make us feel a little happier. It's not like when you eat a hamburger, the next day you'll feel bad if you don't eat a hamburger.
As I earlier, I am not a smoker myself, and I've never found this to be an issue. I've dated plenty of smokers and was never bothered by the smell or taste after 15 minutes are so. Perhaps some people are more sensitive too it than others?BringBackBuck said:It's not about the habit, or writing someone off because of one weakness, I could never be with a smoker because the smell and taste are disgusting. If you are a non-smoker it is just impractical to date someone who you would not be able to kiss until they had showered, changed their clothes, washed their hair, left their smelly apartment, and taken a breathmint.
Well said my friendblind_dead_mcjones said:here's a repeat from a previous topic regarding smoking (with a couple of minor alterations at the end)
consider that the exhaust fumes from cars and burnt petrol is at least 10 times as toxic/poisonous/damaging to you than 2nd hand smoke, those that live in the city are effectively surrounded by such fumes and breathing them in on near constant basis, and there are far more car users around then there are smokers
to which i ask, why are there never any demonisation about the use of all internal combustion engines (cars, buses, trucks, motorcycles, lawn mowers, chainsaws, hedge trimmers, portable generators, etc) in public areas despite the apparent increased health danger compared to standing too close to a smoker? and yet smokers are treated like lepers? just a thought.
Hmmm, yea I can see how that works, though I personally have not seen many people eating fast food treated as harshly, but perhaps I just have not gone out enough/to the right places, thanks for correcting me on the alcohol thing though.Araksardet said:Actually, I think people who eat fast food *are* treated quite harshly. McDonald's jokes, anyone? Alcohol is somewhat different, because it's not perceived as being as dangerous physiologically (even if it is) - most people associate the health risks of alcohol with addiction, car accidents, drunken violence, and alcohol poisoning, not with "normal" consumption (whereas "normal" consumption of cigarettes and fast food are both perceived as unhealthy).cameron196789 said:People argue that they are killing themselves, but are people drinking alcohol and eating fast food not killing themselves, yet I don't see people being as harsh on these people as they do on smokers.