Moist. Secure. Maybe a little dirty. Don't you think it's unrealistic to expect everyone to understand every reference?NuclearDude said:What's it like living under a rock?Dead Century said:Who?shootthebandit said:Thanks sheldon cooper
I get your point, but can't you, you know.. block those mongoloids who are bullying you? Or simply not add them as your friends? Report them?Stasisesque said:-snip-
"Spot" on, i was trying to find a way to basically say what you said in a much longer and poorly written wall of text but you nailed it straight on the head and avoided me the trouble of doing so.Spot1990 said:snip
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheldon_CooperDead Century said:Moist. Secure. Maybe a little dirty. Don't you think it's unrealistic to expect everyone to understand every reference?NuclearDude said:What's it like living under a rock?Dead Century said:Who?shootthebandit said:Thanks sheldon cooper
It's not backwards. It's "forwards," for better or worse. The times are changing and more and more people use the web for socialisation. It's not just for dweebs anymore. there are people who use it to communicate with the world. Again, for better or for worse.flarty said:Are some teenagers really that socially backwards that they rely on social networking sites these days?
While I can't back this up with any facts, I disagree entirely. I believe cyber-bullying can be more devastating or at the very least is just as devastating as "real life" bullying for the reasons I gave in my first post. Social networking is "real life" for kids these days, and it's quite easy to see why. I think I've got a profile on every social network you can think of, and I'm in my late twenties. Teenagers, understandably, lap this lifestyle up. It really is everywhere and will continue to be pervasive for years I'm sure.BiH-Kira said:I get your point, but can't you, you know.. block those mongoloids who are bullying you? Or simply not add them as your friends? Report them?Stasisesque said:-snip-
There are millions of ways of escaping cyber bullying and suicide certainly isn't one of them.
Your post makes it seem like cyber bullying is bullying on a whole new level, while in fact it's nothing compared to real life bullying.
It's probably not unreasonable to expect anyone interested enough to express the question of "who" to be capable of doing fifteen seconds of research on Google.Dead Century said:Moist. Secure. Maybe a little dirty. Don't you think it's unrealistic to expect everyone to understand every reference?
That's just... confusing.Sanshou said:Also that ask.fm girl sent 98% of those hate messages to herself. Only 4 were traced from other people.
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10236272/Ask.fm-Bullied-girl-sent-hate-messages-to-herself.html
Yes. Teenagers are dense. I would know being one myself. But it's not that simple. You CAN stay off the website, you CAN block the bully. But you are told not to do that. Teens are always told to ignore the bullies. Next time you are annoyed or aggravated by someone in the workplace ask yourself "Why don't I quit? Am I really that dense? Am I really so socially backwards that I put my self in a position I don't like?". Hopefully that will put it in some perspective for you. Then there are the teens that ARE socially inept, or as you put it "socially backwards". They usually have some form of low self-esteem. So to come home from school where they are very uncomfortable and/or already bullied, log onto their preferred social media website to converse with their friends only to be faced with more bullying destroys any sense of security they might have. For them, nowhere is safe. They can never relax. They never know who the next person to turn on them is. To deem them "dense" for that is to demonstrate your own incredibly dense view of people who aren't as "awesome" as you.flarty said:Well, here in the U.K cyber bullying seems to be a big issue at the moment, after some teenagers have killed themselves over abusive comments and messages, with ask.fm being at the centre of the storm.
Now while this is a horrible tragedy for the families involved. My question is when did teenagers became so dense? Are they not aware that they do not have to visit these social networking sites? If they were really so upset at receiving such distasteful messages off anonymous people couldn't they just switched off and watched funny cat videos instead?
Are some teenagers really that socially backwards that they rely on social networking sites these days?
Pre. She created an ask.fm account to abuse herself.Abomination said:That's just... confusing.Sanshou said:Also that ask.fm girl sent 98% of those hate messages to herself. Only 4 were traced from other people.
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10236272/Ask.fm-Bullied-girl-sent-hate-messages-to-herself.html
What are the timestamps of those messages? Pre or post-mortem?
Because we're either looking at a girl who had some serious issues or a parent trying to divert blame.
That's the rub, isn't it? The problem with most of this is that people tend to see depression as an emotion rather than a condition, suicide as though it's something done with rational thought, and speech as though it impacts everyone the same way (well, it doesn't bother me, so....)Stasisesque said:As for suicide, if you are suicidal it really, really does not matter what your trigger is. The only thing that can possibly help you is professional/medical help.
Given that the only evidence the telegraph or the sunday times provide is "a source" I wouldn't take it seriously.Sanshou said:Pre. She created an ask.fm account to abuse herself.Abomination said:That's just... confusing.Sanshou said:Also that ask.fm girl sent 98% of those hate messages to herself. Only 4 were traced from other people.
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10236272/Ask.fm-Bullied-girl-sent-hate-messages-to-herself.html
What are the timestamps of those messages? Pre or post-mortem?
Because we're either looking at a girl who had some serious issues or a parent trying to divert blame.
I dont get it.