Are you a boobs or ass person?
- Thread starter FilipJPhry
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Face > Legs > Arse > Boobs
Greasy hair is a dealbreaker but other than that it doesn't bother me much.
Greasy hair is a dealbreaker but other than that it doesn't bother me much.
Ah, sorry 'bout that.Lunar Templar said:Jonluw said:I'm going to quote the OP from one of my earlier thread, and then you can have a guess at what I am.Hiya escapists.
Ah, the female chest area. La poitrine. These globular sacks of fatty tissue. Or, somewhat crudely, "tits". Recognized as a masterpiece of form and function by men and women alike. A perfect amalgation of shapeliness, consistency and practicality.
Studies[footnote]Disclaimer: Data not derived from actual studies.[/footnote] show that people with access to breasts are consistently happier than those who must live without them. Truly a sight to behold and a constant source of joy for many a person, such creations are by most recognized as the magnificent wonders of the natural world that they are.
And yet, by virtue of the mighty PG-13, trying to include illustrations in this thread would see me swiftly stricken down by the banhammer.
[sub]Sorry[/sub]
I've been thinking a bit about breasts, as I am wont to do. Specifically, I've been thinking about our relationship to breasts when it comes to social norms.
Most people would not be uncomfortable with an infant seeing a breast. Hell, they spend most of the day latched on to them with their mouths. People generally regard it as unproblematic for children up to around three or four years of age to be exposed to breasts.
However, at around this age, a strange new social norm steps into place. From this point forward, all interaction with breasts other than the child's own is forbidden.
Breasts may now no longer enter the child's field of vision lest they be wrapped in a sufficiently concealing fabric.
Why is it that we must shield our young from the sight of something that is universally agreed on to be things of beauty? What are we afraid will happen?
[sub]?[/sub]
This norm is popularly attributed to the formation of the child's sexuality, and as such, exceptions are known to have been made when the context was explicitly non-sexual. The problem seems to be that the design of the breast is too grand. Simply too perfect. To the point where the mere sight of such wondrous pieces of flesh is enough to arouse feelings of... well, arousal. In those that are attracted to women that is. And consequently, indecency in those who aren't.
So from this point forward, the child is no longer allowed to bask in the sweetness of the female mammary area.
Sure, the norm may allow a look once in a while for educational purposes or for "art", but these rare viewings happen exclusively on the terms that one is absolutely not allowed to enjoy looking.
And touching, so as to take in the full beauty of breasts other than one's own, is completely forbidden.
Films which at some point display an areola are carefully kept out of reach of these children, lest they should anger the deity "PG-13"-
Up until a certain point, that is. The age at which breasts are normally allowed to be reintroduced to a person's life lies at around 16-18 years in most western cultures. At this point, one may once again experience the grandeur with which one was so closely acquainted in one's past.
And truly the feeling is glorious.
But why does this all happen? It would all have been quite understandable if the sexuality which enters children's lives, prompting them to be cut off from breasts, disappears with age. But that does not seem to be the case. Indeed, late teenagers seem to be more sexual than most other people on the planet!
So why, then, are such massive efforts being exerted to keep children protected from taking part in the wonders of breasts?
What is the secret of these 12 to 15 years of one's life that leads us to keep them artificially devoid of bosoms, melons, milk factories, busts, funbags, knockers, balisties, boobies, jugs, nipples, jublies and [HEADING=2]Stonking great tits?![/HEADING]
Captcha: life's too short
hmmm ..... i THINK, your being a touch to subtle about your preferences
To clarify: I'm an ass man.
Seriously though: The whole is what matters. I'm big into pretty eyes, but they still need a good face to be attached to, and my preferences on body parts varies with body type.
I like petite, maybe a bit tomboyish, women, but I don't mind big boobs.
I don't really want big boobs on my petite women though. If she has large breasts, I prefer a more curvy, and probably taller, body type.
Some mighty fine ass there. Just look at these perky tits:TopazFusion said:Ass all the way.
I mean, just look at this damn fine ass . . .
No you aren't.Shadie777 said:
But they're so easy to forget when we talk about sexy things, because they aren't that related to sexual organs. And society hasn't sexualized them as much.
Zettai ryouiki [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ZettaiRyouiki]. Mmmmmmmm...
I see that way too rarely in real life.
I can't choose both?...
Y'know what. Fuck it. I'm down for most, if not all, parts of a woman.
Looking at what females have put make me feel a bit self conscious, because I am in no way a muscular man. Hopefully I can survive off my ass.
Put me down for legs aswell.Shadie777 said:
Y'know what. Fuck it. I'm down for most, if not all, parts of a woman.
Looking at what females have put make me feel a bit self conscious, because I am in no way a muscular man. Hopefully I can survive off my ass.
just to add to that.Jonluw said:Ah, sorry 'bout that.Lunar Templar said:Jonluw said:I'm going to quote the OP from one of my earlier thread, and then you can have a guess at what I am.Hiya escapists.
Ah, the female chest area. La poitrine. These globular sacks of fatty tissue. Or, somewhat crudely, "tits". Recognized as a masterpiece of form and function by men and women alike. A perfect amalgation of shapeliness, consistency and practicality.
Studies[footnote]Disclaimer: Data not derived from actual studies.[/footnote] show that people with access to breasts are consistently happier than those who must live without them. Truly a sight to behold and a constant source of joy for many a person, such creations are by most recognized as the magnificent wonders of the natural world that they are.
And yet, by virtue of the mighty PG-13, trying to include illustrations in this thread would see me swiftly stricken down by the banhammer.
[sub]Sorry[/sub]
I've been thinking a bit about breasts, as I am wont to do. Specifically, I've been thinking about our relationship to breasts when it comes to social norms.
Most people would not be uncomfortable with an infant seeing a breast. Hell, they spend most of the day latched on to them with their mouths. People generally regard it as unproblematic for children up to around three or four years of age to be exposed to breasts.
However, at around this age, a strange new social norm steps into place. From this point forward, all interaction with breasts other than the child's own is forbidden.
Breasts may now no longer enter the child's field of vision lest they be wrapped in a sufficiently concealing fabric.
Why is it that we must shield our young from the sight of something that is universally agreed on to be things of beauty? What are we afraid will happen?
[sub]?[/sub]
This norm is popularly attributed to the formation of the child's sexuality, and as such, exceptions are known to have been made when the context was explicitly non-sexual. The problem seems to be that the design of the breast is too grand. Simply too perfect. To the point where the mere sight of such wondrous pieces of flesh is enough to arouse feelings of... well, arousal. In those that are attracted to women that is. And consequently, indecency in those who aren't.
So from this point forward, the child is no longer allowed to bask in the sweetness of the female mammary area.
Sure, the norm may allow a look once in a while for educational purposes or for "art", but these rare viewings happen exclusively on the terms that one is absolutely not allowed to enjoy looking.
And touching, so as to take in the full beauty of breasts other than one's own, is completely forbidden.
Films which at some point display an areola are carefully kept out of reach of these children, lest they should anger the deity "PG-13"-
Up until a certain point, that is. The age at which breasts are normally allowed to be reintroduced to a person's life lies at around 16-18 years in most western cultures. At this point, one may once again experience the grandeur with which one was so closely acquainted in one's past.
And truly the feeling is glorious.
But why does this all happen? It would all have been quite understandable if the sexuality which enters children's lives, prompting them to be cut off from breasts, disappears with age. But that does not seem to be the case. Indeed, late teenagers seem to be more sexual than most other people on the planet!
So why, then, are such massive efforts being exerted to keep children protected from taking part in the wonders of breasts?
What is the secret of these 12 to 15 years of one's life that leads us to keep them artificially devoid of bosoms, melons, milk factories, busts, funbags, knockers, balisties, boobies, jugs, nipples, jublies and [HEADING=2]Stonking great tits?![/HEADING]
Captcha: life's too short
hmmm ..... i THINK, your being a touch to subtle about your preferences
To clarify: I'm an ass man.
Seriously though: The whole is what matters. I'm big into pretty eyes, but they still need a good face to be attached to, and my preferences on body parts varies with body type.
I like petite, maybe a bit tomboyish, women, but I don't mind big boobs.
I don't really want big boobs on my petite women though. If she has large breasts, I prefer a more curvy, and probably taller, body type.
not being a ***** 24/7 to. she needs to be nice over all and fun doesn't hurt ether. there's a lot of pyshical imperfections one can over look if the person inside is beautiful. over looking those imperfections is kinda the trick
I used to be mainly an ass person, and I still kinda am.
Now though, I like the whole package, hair, eyes, face, boobs, waist, ass, legs, and feet.
Also I remember making this thread a couple of years back. Good times.
Now though, I like the whole package, hair, eyes, face, boobs, waist, ass, legs, and feet.
Also I remember making this thread a couple of years back. Good times.
