I am sorry for the misunderstanding. I meant that the evidence against the developers will convict them. They will be proven guilty. It would be like if the police caught you with say a scheduled 2 drug (prescription) and it looked like you were selling them because you had the bottle out and your friend was handing you cash (this was all the police saw). You would be convicted in court of unlawful distribution, police eyewitness, drugs, money changing hands. Unless, you could convince the jury that this was a wacky misunderstanding (say your friend owed you money and just happen to catch up to you when you were taking your medicine).Devoneaux said:Now see, I happen to come from America, and not a fascist hellhole, so the idea that innocence needs to be proven is an alien concept to me.Gilhelmi said:See, Greece is a sovereign nation. As such, they have the right to protect their military secrets.Jubbert said:Wow Greece just cant do anything right, not their economy or their legal system.
Are the developers telling the truth? Probably (note: I only said probably, the stories from WW2 about what those spies did and said to get info is crazy)
Can the developers prove this in court? That will remain to be seen. I suspect the trial out-come is 70-30% odds against the developers.
So what I am saying is that they will be proven guilty because of the evidence, BUT they might be able to prove their innocence.
Really, based on the info I have seen anyway, they should have known better then to be where they were. Their best hope is to try and show the they accidentally went onto private land. At the same time though, I do not know of a country that would not arrest you for photographing military installations. Heck, there are strict policies in place about family members taking photos at their homes on US posts (mainly, avoid landmarks in background and "when in doubt ASK, the army don't forgive").