Only started using this site this week and have noticed that in pretty much every thread you get one guy who feels the need to be sarcastic and be little the OPs point.
If someone's first post is a blatant repost, troll or poorly spelt versus thread, then they haven't taken the briefest moment from their day to try and acquire the taboos and accepted policies of the forum. Mistakes tend to be less serious, of a practical nature and concern things like double/triple posts, no-texts and a lax attitude to spelling.Knight Templar said:How can you tell between a person who doesn't care and one who makes mistakes?
Such arrogance, it astounds me. If you're joking it is lost on me.Bright_Raven said:if they had banned me that would of ended badly...
who mderated the moderators? they moderate themselves *snigger*
Wow...so, is there like a 'special moderator squad' that go round dressed in black with helmets and shoulder pads made of skulls and stuff like that?wilsonscrazybed said:More moderators.NewGeekPhilosopher said:Who moderates the moderators?
Just don't ask who moderates the moderator moderators.scumofsociety said:Wow...so, is there like a 'special moderator squad' that go round dressed in black with helmets and shoulder pads made of skulls and stuff like that?wilsonscrazybed said:More moderators.NewGeekPhilosopher said:Who moderates the moderators?
If I wasn't too lazy to dig it up, I would direct you to an incident that happened several weeks ago.Knight Templar said:How can you tell between a person who doesn't care and one who makes mistakes?
Is it Cthulhu? It's Cthulhu, isn't it? Darn. Oh well, evil though it is, it beats the hell of a giant mecha Meta-Mod. Unless...wilsonscrazybed said:Just don't ask who moderates the moderator moderators.
That's sort of where I'm coming from. It's not just up to the moderators to police the community, we as a community ourselves have to be responsible for our own actions and support members, both experienced and new. If we can do that then the Escapist will be a better place for all to contribute.cuddly_tomato said:In an ideal world the forum wouldn't need moderators. I think is to some extent the ops point (please correct me if I am wrong Inverse Skies). There is simply no need to attack or be offensive to someone else merely because this is the internet. It seems to have become part of forum culture these days to behave like a jackass whenever one gets a keyboard and finds someone who disagrees with you about anything, how about we try to reverse that trend?
wilsonscrazybed said:Just don't ask who moderates the moderator moderators.
Let me get this straight. You got banned at ebaumsworld for going public with an argument with a moderator, now all moderators are some sort of conspiracy keeping you from being truly free on the internet? Excuse me if I don't sympathize.Bright_Raven said:such as, insulting the spelling of someone who is typeing on a fourum at 11:40 at night...
dont make that into a subject. i was repeatedly harrased by a moderator so i put up a topic asking the community about the responsibilities given to moderators (including a mention of www.ebaulmsworld.com the forums there are the reason moderators exist) and their reply? after a short time and many replies a short "We moderate ourselves" note and a blocked thread. if they had banned me that would of ended badly...
who mderated the moderators? they moderate themselves *snigger*
and i ment it would have been a big conspiracy if the moderators had banned someone for promoting discussion on the pros and cons of moderators. i was actually pro-mod, but against them each having god-like powers to ban people without the support of a few more random moderators.
If it isn't, it should be.scumofsociety said:
Then your recourse is to pack your bags and leave the site. I ran foul of moderator abuse myself in a particular forum. After appealing to some of the more senior moderators they apologised and promised the situation would be rectified, and it was for a few weeks. Then it started again. It wasn't my place to argue again so I simply left.Bright_Raven said:no, and i just ralised how bad my spelling was in that last post.wilsonscrazybed said:Let me get this straight. You got banned at ebaumsworld for going public with an argument with a moderator, now all moderators are some sort of conspiracy keeping you from being truly free on the internet? Excuse me if I don't sympathize.Bright_Raven said:such as, insulting the spelling of someone who is typeing on a fourum at 11:40 at night...
dont make that into a subject. i was repeatedly harrased by a moderator so i put up a topic asking the community about the responsibilities given to moderators (including a mention of www.ebaulmsworld.com the forums there are the reason moderators exist) and their reply? after a short time and many replies a short "We moderate ourselves" note and a blocked thread. if they had banned me that would of ended badly...
who mderated the moderators? they moderate themselves *snigger*
and i ment it would have been a big conspiracy if the moderators had banned someone for promoting discussion on the pros and cons of moderators. i was actually pro-mod, but against them each having god-like powers to ban people without the support of a few more random moderators.
i opened a topic hear about the need for a limit to be put on the powers of moderators. so that if MOD-A wants to ban SMITH then he has to get approval from 1/3 of the other MODs. or something. because the system is open to abuse if someone decides to ban the people he doesn't like for no reason. i was at one point harrased by a MOD on this site, not enough to get pissed, but enough to get annoyed. i also had seen some unfair lockings and banings. i rounded it out by directing them to ebaums world to view a site without any MODs. ebaums world fourms are full of the most racist and offencive comments possible, it really is sickening the 100th time you see "f**in ni**a HAHAHA!" on every "funny" picture sowing misfortune. i dont go there anymore, it makes me feel dirty.