As a former boycotter I now understand Gabe's decision to go on with left 4 dead 2,+ Qs about valve.

Recommended Videos

Plazmatic

New member
May 4, 2009
654
0
0
I once thought that it was a good idea to boycott left 4 dead 2, * I own it now * and at first hated valve in general for it, then the left 4 dead dev team, but still wondered why Gabe Newell would not stop it from coming out.

I think I understand now, money. Not some greed obsession or anything like that, I doubt Gabe is like that, but something else. It would not make sense for valve to need money for the game, just to run as a company, it gets A LOT of money from steam. What I think it was now was investors. After all valve is a company, like Monsanto, and Berkshire Hathaway, and has investors. I'm guessing who ever is head of managing money at valve or Gabe announced to their investors that they were going to make some profit by the end of the year or something. Left 4 dead 2 was probably calculated in that. If Valve were to not release Left 4 dead 2, they might have lost a lot of investors, and valve might have suffered greatly. There was no point in boycotting, I wonder if fellow former (or still boycotters) agree with me, or think this might be true.

Second, did Gabe actually work on half life, and the rest of the half life series? Tf2? Left 4 dead?

Third were the hell did the Left 4 Dead dev team come from, were they involved in any of valves former projects?

I know people are going to say this is better for the steam forums, however, I don't care.
 

Cyks

New member
Feb 25, 2010
2
0
0
erm, valve is not like those other examples. It is private, therefore not a publicly traded company.
 

RJ Dalton

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,285
0
0
mocruz1200 said:
Cyks said:
erm, valve is not like those other examples. It is private, therefore not a publicly traded company.
i want a stake in valve....
Mmm. Steak.


Okay, but to be at least slightly on, I really don't care if Valve take their time on HL2E3, as long as it blows my socks off in direct proportion to the amount of time I have to wait for it.
 

mocruz1200

New member
Jan 17, 2009
562
0
0
RJ Dalton said:
mocruz1200 said:
Cyks said:
erm, valve is not like those other examples. It is private, therefore not a publicly traded company.
i want a stake in valve....
Mmm. Steak.


Okay, but to be at least slightly on, I really don't care if Valve take their time on HL2E3, as long as it blows my socks off in direct proportion to the amount of time I have to wait for it.
its probably done and gabe is sitting on it just to spite us. imma send a letter to valve and explain my concerns. with valves record for doing random things to people that contact them, ill probably get a crowbar in the mail.....
 

Jennacide

New member
Dec 6, 2007
1,019
0
0
Did nobody else read the reasons behind the creation of L4D2 but me and my friends? I mean, if they for some stupid reason announced a L4D3 THEN people could be pissed. But the reasons for L4D2 were sound, and THE FAULT OF VALVE FANBOYS. People ***** so much about Valve not meeting deadlines that they tried to make sure L4D did, leaving stuff they wanted in the game for the sequel.
 

DoctorNick

New member
Oct 31, 2007
881
0
0
Cyks said:
erm, valve is not like those other examples. It is private, therefore not a publicly traded company.
Just because they're not a publicly traded company doesn't mean they don't have private investors, which I've been told can be even more demanding and controlling than share holders.

At the end of the day though, they are still a business who's purpose is to make money. If they didn't have that at or at least VERY near the top of the priority list then they would likely go out of business very quickly.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,526
4,295
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
the complaint was that it was going to be essentualy an ad on for l4d which turned out to not be the case, they really improved the game engine, I love blowing parts off of the regular infected, altho I miss frances