Mazty said:
Make-up can give the illusion of a more symmetrical face by giving a consistent gradient to a dodgy complextion etc.
Fair enough, but that's certainly something I tend to notice and it turns me off.
Mazty said:
Sadly you did not answer my question:
How is accentuating a persons features a bad idea/makes them less attractive?
Other than making the person feel better about themselves, make-up hardly makes someone look less attractive.
I felt I did, but I'll try again. I never said it's a "bad idea", I think I've said several times that it can be a good thing. I don't think it's automatically or always a good thing. In my opinion, and that of some others, it doesn't
always make people more attractive. And some people feel fine the way they are. Why should they put on make-up?
Mazty said:
If you look for pictures of actresses without make-up, you will see my point.
These actresses you mention are hardly representative of all women to begin with. Does make up make some of them more attractive to most people? I believe so, yes.
Mazty said:
Yes men do wear make-up in films as well. It's not just because of lighting and filming, that makes no sense as the lighting can just be daylight, and a prerequisite of filming isn't "you have to wear make-up" - it's because they look better for wearing it, and the audience likes to watch attractive, or at least pleasing people on screen most of the time.
"Daylight" is hardly natural lighting in Hollywood. Of course they aim for a certain look in films, that's why they wear the make-up. It's not like they would melt in the lighting if they didn't. In cinema you have to be unnatural to be natural, so to speak.
Mazty said:
It's not about promoting a certain look - it's about looking better. Would you prefer to go around in the cheapest possible clothing, or given the choice, designer labels?
"Good looks" are subjective. Personally, I don't really care about how much the clothing costs or who made it. If I find it looks good, it looks good. And believe it or not, some people look better in cheap clothes than designer stuff. My opinion, of course.
Mazty said:
You have to remember, make-up exists to make people look better. If it didn't do that, or if it was just an "in thing", it wouldn't be hundreds of years old, or a billion dollar industry.
Well, yes, it exists to make people look more appealing, usually to suit whatever look is prevalent at a given time. It doesn't mean it's always successful or neccessary.
Mazty said:
Basically to summarise, everyone would look better with make-up, and when done right, almost everyone would tend to agree (Those who wouldn't are like those who tend to like pain etc, as in be part of an unusual minority), as when it is done right (depending on style) you can't tell as it looks natural.
Well, I have certainly been hanging around the wrong women, then, since I've never seen any make-up that didn't look like make-up. But I don't agree everyone would look better with make-up, or that they should wear make-up even if it did. I don't consider myself a part of a minority, even if this view may be a minority view. You don't need to be a freak to be an exception from the norm.
Mazty said:
Oh and proof in point, find me someone who looks better without make-up than with some on.
How would that prove my point? It's not like we have the same taste. And I wouldn't feel comfortable uploading pictures of people I know.
At any rate, I find that people who are attractive in real life, don't always photograph well. If Hollywood aesthetics are your only definition of good looking people, then I'll have to agree with your logic on that part.
"Even beauties can be unattractive. If you catch a beauty in the wrong light at the right time, forget it. I believe in low lights and trick mirrors. I believe in plastic surgery."
And I agree with that sentiment. But that's not the only kind of aesthetical beauty there is. And it doesn't adress the issue that some people don't feel the need to use make-up.