Best stand-alone game this generation?

Recommended Videos

shadow_Fox81

New member
Jul 29, 2011
410
0
0
Vuavu said:
Haha you keep correcting people man... But they're right. Anytime something is called a 'stand-alone ____' it can still be part of a series. 'Stand-alone' just means you don't NEED to play/view/read the other games/movies/books in the series to get the full effect of the individual installment.

EDIT: Also, I'm gonna have to say... Portal? I guess. Haha it's hard to decide on one. But theoretically and logically, that's gotta be it. There are probably a ton of good games that aren't coming to mind right now though.
man this guy knows whats on, if only i hadn't taken so long to think of how to phrase it, and find evidence(curse my english literary schooling).

even said portal before me.

i guess its still all peaches and gravy.
 

Baralak

New member
Dec 9, 2009
1,244
0
0
The best I could give is a top 5 list, which is, in no particular order:

Bayonetta
Vanquish
Alpha Protocol
Mirror's Edge
Too Human

I loved all of these games, and I'm sad that the only one with a real shot at a sequel is Bayonetta.
 

KP Shadow

New member
Jul 7, 2009
406
0
0
LobsterFeng said:
Well so far I would say Batman: Arkham Asylum. Yes I know it's not exactly standalone, and it has a sequel right around the corner, but you know what? It was such a good game about Batman, that it made everyone think "Why did it take this long to make a good game about Batman? Because, you know, BATMAN!"
If I'm correct, LEGO Batman, which, while not quite as good, was still pretty damn good, came out first.

Also, I'd have to say... Castle Crashers or Minecraft. With Castle Crashers, aside from a few kinks here and there, it's the perfect revival of the arcade beat-em-up genre. With Minecraft, it's sold god knows how many copies before the final game has even come out. That's impressive right there.
 

Firia

New member
Sep 17, 2007
1,945
0
0
I would contest your prereqs are to strict.

I haven't invested much thought into it, but I want to say Prince of Persia 2008- now before you go jumping on me about it's a franchise, I'd like to point a few things out. It's a radically different game from it's predecessors, and other than having an otherwise unnamed "Prince," it had almost nothing else in common with the Sands of Time series of games.

The art direction, the flow of gameplay, character development and interaction, right down to the boss battles were all silky smooth for me. I wanted more of the game- in fact when I bought it, I beat it at 100% completion a day before the DLC was released. And you can believe I bought that up in a hurry.

(I really enjoyed PoP Sands of Time, but the ones that followed just didn't fit that same character development, or art direction. I felt like I was reconnection with the franchise with the 2008 game. Shame others didn't feel the same.)
 

OniYouji

New member
Jan 4, 2011
119
0
0
Up until recently, I would say "999: Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors". It's getting a sequel now (which it really didn't need at all), so it's no longer eligible...still brilliantly done, though.

Something that probably will not be getting a sequel would be the game Fragile Dreams: Farewell Ruins of the Moon. I adored this game. I adored the characters, the setting, the story, the mementos, the style...granted, there were some things that I wished didn't happen or things that I wished happened instead, and not every character was well done, but I still loved the end result and truly wish that more games like it would be made. But I do not mean a sequel, but more games with this focus on more emotionally driving and personal stories.
 

Arnoxthe1

Elite Member
Dec 25, 2010
3,391
2
43
Honestly, I can't think of a stand-alone game I've played for this generation that was actually really good.

Now if we didn't limit it to THIS generation, I would have to say these 3:

Freelancer
Raptor: Call of the Shadows
Psi-Ops: The Mindgate Conspiracy

EDIT: I take it back. Prototype.
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
Most games that are good, also get a SEQUEL.

The best 'stand-alone' game will be mediocre a best. Hell, even mediocre games get sequels.
 

NerfedFalcon

Level i Flare!
Mar 23, 2011
7,626
1,477
118
Gender
Male
Firia said:
I would contest your prereqs are to strict.

I haven't invested much thought into it, but I want to say Prince of Persia 2008- now before you go jumping on me about it's a franchise, I'd like to point a few things out. It's a radically different game from it's predecessors, and other than having an otherwise unnamed "Prince," it had almost nothing else in common with the Sands of Time series of games.
Okay, I will give you that. To the point of putting it in the OP.
 

Lordmarkus

New member
Jun 6, 2009
1,384
0
0
urprobablyright said:
Might be World in Conflict. A genuinely top notch RTS and I'm pretty sure it hasn't had a sequel (an expansion, though)
This. So much this.

And damn you for reminding me that I will never get another game from Massive. It's been 4 long years and according to their website they're helping Ubisoft to port Far Cry 3 and AssCreed: Revelations to the PC. Massive Entertainment. Porting console games for the most despicable, lazy and PC hating company in the business. I feel like weeping blood just thinking of it.
 

GundamSentinel

The leading man, who else?
Aug 23, 2009
4,448
0
0
Quinton Bonnett said:
Would Demon's Souls count? Dark Souls is a spiritual successor, so I can't quite tell if that throws it out of consideration.
Well, Dark Souls isn't out yet and as a spiritual successor I'd say it's not a franchise. Demon's Souls itself is a spiritual successor to the King's Field games. To me, it's stand alone. And as my favorite PS3 game it gets my vote.


What?
 

Hamish Durie

New member
Apr 30, 2011
1,210
0
0
mirrors edge because the gameplay, story and art style are all new and flow very well

BEFORE any of you bring up the do it again do it again do it again style of death, try again instanly

there is no way this won't make me sound like a dick
it helps if you don't die
 

NinjaCatStudios

New member
Mar 30, 2011
81
0
0
It's quite funny how I read the title and thought "hmm, The World Ends With You?" and then I read your post.

I'm not actually sure to be honest.
Minecraft is definetaly up there though.
 

The_Fezz

New member
Oct 21, 2010
157
0
0
Enslaved: Odyssey to the West, 2010's answer to Uncharted, with excellent character and an affecting if slightly mental ending.
 

babinro

New member
Sep 24, 2010
2,518
0
0
AzrealMaximillion said:
babinro said:
Angry Birds - It's genuinely fun in a casual way and almost universally loved by most age groups.
There was a flash game that came out years before Angry Birds that was the EXACT same thing called Crush the Castle. But then again this kind of thing happens to flash game all the time.
I've heard that as well, but to my understanding Angry Birds is still a stand-alone product. Even if it is a facelift from a prior title I've not played.

Also, if it is as identical as people claim, have the makers of Crush the Castle sued Angry Birds yet? I mean there would be a ton of money to make there.
 

Nudu

New member
Jun 1, 2011
318
0
0
leet_x1337 said:
Nudu said:
Oblivion for me.
Dude. And everyone. I'm only going to say this one more time.

Oblivion is part of the 'Elder Scrolls' series, along with Arena, Daggerfall, Morrowind and Skyrim. As such, it's not 'standalone' by this thread's definition.
Sorry about that. Didn't think stand-alone. Though I blame the fact that I consider it sort of a wierd question. There's no reason to distinguish a game that's part of a series that would hold on it's own and a stand-alone game.