Did you just call The Guardian a tabloid magazine?2xDouble said:Yes I am making fun of you. That's what you get for taking your news from a tabloid.
Oh fucking wow.
Did you just call The Guardian a tabloid magazine?2xDouble said:Yes I am making fun of you. That's what you get for taking your news from a tabloid.
This.Giantpanda602 said:The government hasn't released the picture. That was just probably some guy photoshopping a picture together to make a quick buck from some gullible news team.
Based on what? There is at least and equal possibility he would become a "martyr to the cause" and spur further violence.Saviordd1 said:Besides, if he's dead that would quicken the end of the war, so your argument is invalid.
This. Seriously, newspapers? Not only does the whole idea that there is a photo of a man's dead body to put in papers stupid, but did it not occur to you that the skin tones are oh, I don't know, completely fucking different?Woodsey said:THAT'S the photo? They needed to write an article and put research into telling you that that was a fake?
I've seen more convincing nude fakes of Katy Perry than that thing.
alright, that tears it, place your hand here for your complementary internet-high-five.2xDouble said:Yeah... the photo is fake, the DNA tests were lies, the raids were staged, the weird-looking compound in the middle of an Afghan city that we "raided"? it's really a movie studio owned by Disney... It's all a plot by Glen Beck and Jon Stewart (secretly working together!) to bring about mass murder across several countries, including, but not limited to: the USA, England, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, South Africa, and Japan.
It's all because the "moon landing" was faked... to cover up what we really found on the moon. Which one brave film director, Michael Bay, has discovered and is about to show us in June. Unless "they" get to him first...
Yes I am making fun of you. That's what you get for taking your news from a tabloid.
Too true.2xDouble said:Yeah... the photo is fake, the DNA tests were lies, the raids were staged, the weird-looking compound in the middle of an Afghan city that we "raided"? it's really a movie studio owned by Disney... It's all a plot by Glen Beck and Jon Stewart (secretly working together!) to bring about mass murder across several countries, including, but not limited to: the USA, England, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, South Africa, and Japan.
It's all because the "moon landing" was faked... to cover up what we really found on the moon. Which one brave film director, Michael Bay, has discovered and is about to show us in June. Unless "they" get to him first...
Yes I am making fun of you. That's what you get for taking your news from a tabloid.
Although I agree with you that his death changes nothing the fact that im from London makes me have to disagree with the rest of your post.Elfgore said:Besides, if he's dead that would quicken the end of the war, so your argument is invalid.
He's death changes nothing he didn't even do anything after 911 there are countless people who could easily take his place.
Im guessing not everyone knows what the guardian is guy, do they print it outside the UK?Small Waves said:Did you just call The Guardian a tabloid magazine?2xDouble said:Yes I am making fun of you. That's what you get for taking your news from a tabloid.
Oh fucking wow.
secondAccountfailed said:Dat quote + Dat Avatar = win XDKrychek08 said:[
Only a SPY would say that! WHO ARE YOU WORKING FOR!?!?!?Accountfailed said:Oh geez...if you look hard enough you can find a conspiracy anywhere.
Could not have put the words better myselfKrychek08 said:Oh geez...if you look hard enough you can find a conspiracy anywhere.
Yeah, I really worded that badly, didn't I? I'll fix it.scumofsociety said:Yes it is, but that doesn't really equate to the OP getting his news from a tabloid...unless of course I've misread what you were saying and the "That's what you get for taking your news from a tabloid" was just referring to people who had taken the Mail story at face value and nothing to do with the preceeding sentence "Yes I am making fun of you." or the preceeding paragraph in which you were taking the piss out of his conspiracy theories.2xDouble said:Maybe, but the Daily Mail, another rag which ran the fake image and is cited in the article, certainly looks like one.
Awwww. *puts pants back on*DVnotDivvy said:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/02/osama-bin-laden-photo-fake
According to a recent New York Magazine article, DNA evidence confirms that Usama Bin Laden was indeed killed last night. However, a photo which has been circulating on the internet claiming to be the dead body of Usama Bin Laden, has been proven to be a composite of two different images. Does this reawaken anyone's belief that Bin Laden really died in 2001 and that this is just a cover-up to justify the war in Afghanistan?
Facepunch right there. Too many people on that website photoshop everything that see.Metal Brother said:Nope. It just reawaken my belief that there are lots of assholes on the internet with Photoshop and free time.DVnotDivvy said:Does this reawaken anyone's belief that Bin Laden really died in 2001 and that this is just a cover-up to justify the war in Afghanistan?
I don't see how people missed this fact.Wicky_42 said:That news is like, 2 years old! It was first circulating in 2009 [http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:HhEh-2wPwVMJ:www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/04/29/osama-bin-laden-believed-dead-by-pak-int+osama+bin+laden+believed+killed+by+pak+intel&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&source=www.google.co.uk] and even then people were calling it out as fake XD It's only popped up again cos tabloids want something to stick on the front cover. Whole thing detracts from the more fun conspiracy theories - this one's a long-deadened horse.DVnotDivvy said:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/02/osama-bin-laden-photo-fake
According to a recent New York Magazine article, DNA evidence confirms that Osama Bin Laden was indeed killed last night. However, a photo which has been circulating on the internet claiming to be the dead body of Osama Bin Laden, has been proven to be a composite of two different images. Does this reawaken anyone's belief that Bin Laden really died in 2001 and that this is just a cover-up to justify the war in Afghanistan?