BioShock 3 setting

Recommended Videos

GiantSpiderGoat

New member
Nov 19, 2009
272
0
0
Mr.logic said:
GiantSpiderGoat said:
Where do you think Bioschock 3 should be set. Personally I am bored of rapture and would like to see a changing world environment. Where plasmids and such things that are in Bioshock are revealed to the world. Where do you believe bioshock 3 should be set?
You know the third Bioshock game has been already been announced right?
You know I made this thread before the new Bio shock was announced right.
 

Aphex Demon

New member
Aug 23, 2010
1,280
0
0
Freeroam underwater city, I remember looking out the windows onto rapture in the Bioshock games, wishing I could go explore it.

*sigh*
 

Mr.logic

New member
Nov 18, 2009
544
0
0
GiantSpiderGoat said:
Mr.logic said:
GiantSpiderGoat said:
Where do you think Bioschock 3 should be set. Personally I am bored of rapture and would like to see a changing world environment. Where plasmids and such things that are in Bioshock are revealed to the world. Where do you believe bioshock 3 should be set?
You know the third Bioshock game has been already been announced right?
You know I made this thread before the new Bio shock was announced right.
Oh my bad entirely then, good day to you sir/madam.
 

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
I dunno...both of the ones that are out now were really pretty bad. I'm on the fence about Infinite, but I really don't think the world needs another Bioshock.
 

=HCFS=Discoman

New member
Jan 1, 2010
178
0
0
Exterminas said:
=HCFS=Discoman said:
Exterminas said:
Why call it Bioshock if it isn't set in Rapture? All you would get by introducing plasmids to the world would be a mix of doom 3, followed by a lot of fallout 3.
what bout bioshock: infinite?
look where it is set.
bioshock isn't just rapture: it's the whole experience.
First of all I would always be careful juding a game based on it's trailers. Because that's not how the real product will be.

Second, Bioshock infinite seems to have even less in common with the first Bioshock than I predicted. It doesn't seem to have the same creepy surrounding as the first two games and system shock. So why ceep calling it Bioshock? I don't say it will be a bad game, I just wonder why they want to keep dragging that name along, even when they have moved far from the origiinal setting.

Sure the plot of BIF seems to be similar to the first ones, but basing the naming on that would be like James Cameron calling Avatar "Dances with Wolves: Blue Edition"
maybe the developers ran out of good ideas that could be done in rapture. then again, infinite is set before rapture was even built. it still has upgradeable guns and plasmids, is still called bioshock, and still is quite the same as the other games. new guns, new plot, new environment, but it will still eel quite similar. there are even big daddies. sure, steampunk ones, but they are still there. not a lot has changed, fundamentally it is still the same game.