=HCFS=Discoman said:
Exterminas said:
Why call it Bioshock if it isn't set in Rapture? All you would get by introducing plasmids to the world would be a mix of doom 3, followed by a lot of fallout 3.
what bout bioshock: infinite?
look where it is set.
bioshock isn't just rapture: it's the whole experience.
First of all I would always be careful juding a game based on it's trailers. Because that's not how the real product will be.
Second, Bioshock infinite seems to have even less in common with the first Bioshock than I predicted. It doesn't seem to have the same creepy surrounding as the first two games and system shock. So why ceep calling it Bioshock? I don't say it will be a bad game, I just wonder why they want to keep dragging that name along, even when they have moved far from the origiinal setting.
Sure the plot of BIF seems to be similar to the first ones, but basing the naming on that would be like James Cameron calling Avatar "Dances with Wolves: Blue Edition"