Fagotto said:
I imagine the thing is people don't really know much about the Norse gods at all, but they at least know they're Norse. Change some thing sure, but when the Norse gods don't even look like you'd think a Norse god would look that starts to sort of stretch credulity.
When Asgard is some dimension-slipping space city and the gods are magic-using aliens, I think credulity is shot to ruin. With all of these changes, why is the skin colour of the bouncer such a huge deviation? The names, family ties and personalities of these characters have been so wildly shifted from their initial incarnations that they're only Norse Gods in name to begin with. All I'm saying is that if the fact that this man is black causes you such a horrific lack of immersion when everything else changed here doesn't... there might be more too it than an indignation over religious portrayal.
There's a serious difference between fictional characters and reality. We can cheerfully posit that Thor might have been black when he's also a spacefaring sciencewizard who hangs out with The Hulk, but we know for a fact Hitler was white.
And there's a point where it's stretched a bit far. Being fictional doesn't give such great leeway to change all the details. I'll stick this in the same category as vampires that sparkle. Sure, they're totally fictional beings so you can change whatever you like about them, but the more you change the less I'll think it deserves the original name.
Hang on. The detail that pushes this over the line is his skin tone? What about his accent? He'll have a British one, likely. Thor will be an Australian. These don't stretch it too far, but casting a perfectly able black man to play one of many loosely adapted Norse gods does? The guy has, supposedly, nine mothers! Between the original story and how wacky the marvel version of it is, I just think it's odd that the sticking point is how dark a dude is.
Say he got snowburn a lot. He's always standing near a huge icy bridge, after all.
Anarchemitis said:
I had no idea you read so much into the universe which created such immensely impractical means of warfare, Ultrajoe.
I somehow have a tiny amount of awe inspired in you since the Forlorn Diminishment of Aught'9.
I'm back, baby.
GreyKnight3445 said:
Okay this is ridiculous. Your making comparisons between two different things, both of which make it impossible to object against what you`ve said without getting the fanboy hammer and thereby an easy win for you. but to hell with it, here`s what i have to say.
The implicit insults that I'm here to 'win', would call you a fanboy to do so and that my entire argument is 'ridiculous' because you say so aside; I welcome your opinions and I hope in time you can understand what a Juxtaposition is.
1) female characters are represented similarly to space marines (see Sisters of Battle) and if that doesnt satisfy you than look at the Eldar. A lot of their famous leaders are badass female characters and half their unit base are female. Hopefully that satisfies the pulsating tumor that is "political correctness"
No, it doesn't. See, taking this approach of giving women designated areas in which they can find equal representation and barring them from others because 'they already have their reservations' is just about as textbook an example of sexism as it gets. It's not about 'Satisfying' political correctness, it's about fairness. And Sisters of Battle are a very far cry away from space marines, given their deployment styles and the fact that they lack genetic engineering.
2) You simply cant just take a god from a region where its always cold and snowy (therefore the people there will have white skin for the same reason that people who live in area with climates like Africa will have darker skin). There is no racism in saying that Heimdall shouldnt be black, and that kind of logic (to me in any case) is the same as the logic used by people that claimed that RE5 was racist cause you were shooting africans who were trying to murder you and the same as the actress that accused a producer of being racist because the character was different skin color!
My point is that there are good and bad reasons for opposing something, I'm not here to endorse a Black Hiemdall (although he
will be rockin'), just to encourage people to understand that the problems they have with the casting are actually pretty silly. There are better reasons to oppose it, go with them instead.
You might find it interesting to note my original post includes exactly 1 count of the word 'Racism', and it was used mockingly. Most people are upset with the deviation from continuity, not the black man in question. The only problem is that, as stated, most of the ways they're saying this are silly. 'You simply can't' is pretty silly, isn't it? I mean... he simply did.
Thats why I have to say, please feel free to bash me with the easily acquired "fanboy" hammer because I defend a game and a dead religion.
Also as a side note I respect your right to say that so please respect my right to call you on it, but there`s nothing holding you to it so what the hell.
I respect you, entirely. I just wish you'd respect me enough not to assume I'm a massive prick by default and spend as much time pre-preparing against rebuttal as you do taking part in discussion. I'm here to talk, not rip into you. I just get tetchy when people speak to me like I'm already charged with douchebaggery.
I'm a fanboy, and more importantly I'm not attacking either 40K or Norse Mythology. Please don't treat me as such.