That would be terrible, both for the players and Blizzard. The game isn't well balanced at the moment and some adjustments need to be made to make it at least somewhat fair. Holding off on all balancing changes until the expansion might result in the game not being viewed favourably in the competitive scene, hurting Blizz's future prospects.Dommyboy said:
Err...ignoring the fact that you aren't buying three games for one game's worth of story, you're buying one game for one game's worth, it's baffling how people can still be using this as an argument -after- the game has been released and proved this not to be the case, providing a far more in-depth campaign than SC1 while still giving the players many hours of single player time.Bloodeye said:
"Who Knows"... aka it's not predictable at all! Don't contradict yourself (or look up words before using them).tony2077 said:Sanguinius- The Angel said:Remind me again how:Eleima said:I know I may not be the first one to say this, but I hope we won't have to wait another 12 years for "Heart of the Swarm".Still, considering that the mechanics of the game and the graphics are taken care, it would be nice to have some semblance of a release date. Then again, maybe they're trying to come up with a storyline which isn't as predictable as "Wings of Liberty"'s... Don't get me wrong, though, I like StarCraft! =D
Was predictable?Suddenly switching sides and becoming an ally with your enemy in order to turn Sarah Kerrigan back to a humanshe is still probably part zerg but not crazy as she was before so she'll be able to help raynor well maybe who knows
The Protoss had a awesome backstory , so did the Zerg. It was all in the Starcraft 1 and Starcraft:Broodwar manual and it evolved during the course of those games. The first Zerg campaign was very nicely done despite there being almost only zergs in the briefings.ArmorArmadillo said:
Buccura said:
Not unless "World of Starcraft" is a very long ways off. Blizzard has already confirmed that the ominous "unannounced MMO" which they're working on is an entirely new franchise.GothmogII said:
I wouldn't know about Mass Effect but I have actually played the SC2 single player and to me it felt like the Terran campaign from SC1 with some side missions to pad it out. Not saying I didn't enjoy it just that it seemed a little shallow. Obviously your mileage may vary.GothmogII said:
This means what exactly? That the multiplayer will be expanded, Brood War style? It's difficult to see how they could add more units without them becoming redundant or else throwing the balance way out of whack. The question then is, what CAN they do to the multiplayer which would be worthwhile?Tom Goldman said:
I don't think the whole love thing is BAD persay, it could've been shown better, as in he hates her to the ends of the earth, but's also conflicted inside by the fact he loves her as well, because he technically loves Sarah, wheras he hates the Queen of Blades, who's likely a bit mental.Thedutchjelle said:
