Correct. It's the same rule for having sex with an IV drug user, a prostitute, or being raped. They're considered to be "high risk sexual partners".DirtyJunkieScum said:That's pretty shitty. Does that also hold if the sex is reversed i.e. a woman having unprotected sex with a man who is known to be HIV+?
Also, the use of the undefined term "sexual contact" is problematic. It creates an unnecessary ambiguity while not taking into account low-risk sexual activity.
Paying a hooker for a hummer is still a pretty low risk activity. Much more low risk than a woman having unprotected anal sex with a bunch of dudes she doesn't know. But the former gets you a one year deferral.