But. . Dad! Do I have to watch pr0n with you?

[Maze1125]

Sex is sex, whether you actually watch it on some out dated educational video or program or a movie with fancy angles and music in the background it's still the same.

No it isn't.

Sex in a caring loving relationship is very very different to the sex you see in your average hard-core porn film.

 

[DazZ.]

I'd have found that hilarious if my Dad thought me that way, and later work out that he has masturbated to the material he showed me and feel violated.

 

[Pimppeter2]

This guy has some pretty weird teaching methods. I mean, couldn't he just explain?

I wonder if he had a ruler and would pause the video to point things out

What if he used a projector and laser pointer?

Bah, you kids and your electronics!!

Lazers? What is the world coming to!!

 

[ma55ter_fett]

I learned more from watching porn then I ever did in sex education in school.

 

[Lullabye]

i wish we couldve watched porn in sex ed. besides, they never teach you the things that matter. like what a rim job is.......

 

[Ridonculous_Ninja]

Just to remind people, it was too little girls, not a boy.

As to the OP: Hardcore pornography is legally restricted to 18 year olds where I'm from, and I thought that the law in Texas would be the same.

So yeah, he is breaking the law (as I understand it) by showing them something for which they are not legally viable, same as if he showed them anything else 18 rated.

And 9 is probably still too young to be learning about sex (as in intercourse etc), though that might be my old conservatism talking.

It's weird though that I'm pretty sure it's 18 to watch porn where I am, but 16 to have sex with anyone you want.

That's kind of weird, isn't it?

Also since it's legal to do it with anyone within a year of your age past 12, do they have to do it with their eyes closed?

Hmm...

 

[Lullabye]

Sex is sex, whether you actually watch it on some out dated educational video or program or a movie with fancy angles and music in the background it's still the same.

No it isn't.

Sex in a caring loving relationship is very very different to the sex you see in your average hard-core porn film.

no, sex is sex. the act is the same. the only difference is the feelings you have towards the person.

 

[quiet_samurai]

Sex is sex, whether you actually watch it on some out dated educational video or program or a movie with fancy angles and music in the background it's still the same.

No it isn't.

Sex in a caring loving relationship is very very different to the sex you see in your average hard-core porn film.

The caring loving side is only one aspect of many that are attainable through sex, but that's a whole other topic.

I didn't mean it in a personal sense though, only as a means of media. I have seen some educational videos on sex and they are just a graphic as pornography, it just isn't glorified and doesn't have the flashy lights and fake tits. Presentation is half battle.

I learned more from watching porn then I ever did in sex education in school.

Amen, you learn some pretty good moves too.

no, sex is sex. the act is the same. the only difference is the feelings you have towards the person.

Thank you.

 

[Serge A. Storms]

When I see a story about a father and a son in Texas, usually I'm worried that one of them shot the other one. I don't see anything particularly wrong with this, although he might have started out with something a little more subtle.

EDIT: I guess it might be a little weirder because they were girls, but still, not that big a deal.

 

[ethaninja]

I heard this story a while back from the local news network. Worst part is that he got away with it. Apparently under Texas Law you're allowed to teach your kids about sex through hardcore pornography. The System sucks somtimes...

Indeed. But when you dumb it down a bit, it stil is just sex in the end, granted a little more animalistic (<-not a word) then usual.

 

[Numb1lp]

Yeah, but c'mon, porn is pretty awsome. Anyone seen Barely Legal?

 

[MelasZepheos_v1legacy]

And 9 is probably still too young to be learning about sex (as in intercourse etc), though that might be my old conservatism talking.

I doubt it. Wait until your kids are aged double digits before talking frankly about the more, uh, "intimate" details.

Intercourse etc yes, double digits. But some girls get periods from the age of 9 or below (not much, but still), so a measure of education would probably be a good idea.

Also, maybe if you told kids earlier they'd be so horrified by the mechanics of it they would be more inclined to celibacy.

 

[Canadamus Prime]

What? That's ridiculous. Not only that, it's disgusting. Porn is NOT the way to learn about sex. Porn is the exact opposite of what sex should be like, so if they're learning about sex form that shit, they're getting the wrong message. Could they not even have charged him with like some form of abuse or something?

 

[MelasZepheos_v1legacy]

Just to remind people, it was two little girls, not a boy.

Is that relevant?

Possibly. Also, I get annoyed when people start misinterpreting any sort of article. When you take one liberty, it encourages more, which leads to a complete scewing of the facts.

Also, if people think it was a male child, they will be far more inclined to start spewing "Yay, let the little guy watch porn, he'll do it anyway." Which is just annoying for anyone actually wanting to discuss. For some reason the fact that it's girls is more likely to make people react in horror and fear.

But that's a discussion for another time.

Uhm.........girls watch porn too.

Yes, but I bet this discussion would have taken an entirely different course had it been 'Dad makes young son watch porn' as opposed to 'Dad makes young daughters watch porn. I did say 'for some reason' it makes people react in horror and fear. It's just expected that young boys watch porn, young girls don't. That's part of the reason print material of this nature is called 'Men's Magazines' rather than 'Porn/Sexual/Masturbation/Whatever-unigendered term.'

 

[MajoraPersona]

Sex is sex, whether you actually watch it on some out dated educational video or program or a movie with fancy angles and music in the background it's still the same.

No it isn't.

Sex in a caring loving relationship is very very different to the sex you see in your average hard-core porn film.

no, sex is sex. the act is the same. the only difference is the feelings you have towards the person.

That all depends on the definition of 'sexual intercourse'. If it means 'be naked with someone you love', then one of you is right. If it means 'penetration of the vagina with the penis and mutual stimulation until the male deposits millions of sperm cells into the female, where they subsequently seek out a fertile egg with which to conceive', then gay people are wrong. If it means 'stimulate the reproductive organs of another human being', then you get all sorts of things like ear sex being counted as real.

I find life's little problems are easier to think about when you're insane.

 

[DarkRyter]

Eh, it's a pretty reasonable teaching method.

I know people who have never had "the talk" and learned of their "origins" through "visuals".

 

[CloggedDonkey]

if my dad had come home and said "today Timmy, where gonna watch a movie!" and I asked "what" if he where to reply "sexy bitches riding bare back" I would run very, very fast.

 

[Lullabye]

Sex is sex, whether you actually watch it on some out dated educational video or program or a movie with fancy angles and music in the background it's still the same.

No it isn't.

Sex in a caring loving relationship is very very different to the sex you see in your average hard-core porn film.

no, sex is sex. the act is the same. the only difference is the feelings you have towards the person.

That all depends on the definition of 'sexual intercourse'. If it means 'be naked with someone you love', then one of you is right. If it means 'penetration of the vagina with the penis and mutual stimulation until the male deposits millions of sperm cells into the female, where they subsequently seek out a fertile egg with which to conceive', then gay people are wrong. If it means 'stimulate the reproductive organs of another human being', then you get all sorts of things like ear sex being counted as real.

I find life's little problems are easier to think about when you're insane.

as with most problems in life, it can be solved with a trip to wiki.
wikis definition: This article is about biological sex. For other uses, such as sexual intercourse and gender, see Sex (disambiguation).
This article is semi-protected.
Successful reproductive sex in animals results in the fusion of a sperm and egg cell.

In biology, sex is a process of combining and mixing genetic traits, often resulting in the specialization of organisms into a male or female variety (known as a sex). Sexual reproduction involves combining specialized cells (gametes) to form offspring that inherit traits from both parents. Gametes can be identical in form and function (known as isogametes), but in many cases an asymmetry has evolved such that two sex-specific types of gametes (heterogametes) exist: male gametes are small, motile, and optimized to transport their genetic information over a distance, while female gametes are large, non-motile and contain the nutrients necessary for the early development of the young organism.

An organism's sex is defined by the gametes it produces: males produce male gametes (spermatozoa, or sperm) while females produce female gametes (ova, or egg cells); individual organisms which produce both male and female gametes are termed hermaphroditic. Frequently, physical differences are associated with the different sexes of an organism; these sexual dimorphisms can reflect the different reproductive pressures the sexes experience.


so yeah, i am right. sex is sex and thats that.