buying used games is stupid

Recommended Videos

Sam17

New member
Apr 20, 2010
159
0
0
Why should I be considered with contributing to the industry? They sure as shit aren't going to do me any favours

The way I see it is, if you can catch a break, catch it
 

DSK-

New member
May 13, 2010
2,431
0
0
I used to get all my games used. I'll still continue to do so, especially with my consoles as I don't play online with them, so I don't have to fork out on shitty passes and all that jazz.
 

MorphingDragon

New member
Apr 17, 2009
566
0
0
Tin Man said:
MorphingDragon said:
Most RRP or List Prices for games are around about $120 in NZ, even though we are about $.80 to the US$. I don't know if there's a specific survey anyway, but you can see an upsetting trend for launch games just by looking at some of our online retailers. The RRP for Uncharted 3 is $130NZD...

http://www.mightyape.co.nz/Games/

This is why I buy games on steam.
*Looks at prices*.

"Whhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaa!!!!?!??/1"

*Is violently ill in protest.*

Fuck THAT shit dude, that's crazy! Dude you guys get dicked, thats the equivalent of £60/$98 for a game! Balls son... You and all of the Kiwi brothers and sisters have my sympathy...
Save some love for the Aussie Bros *au*.
 

RedEyesBlackGamer

The Killjoy Detective returns!
Jan 23, 2011
4,701
0
0
bahumat42 said:
Shamanic Rhythm said:
bahumat42 said:
Shamanic Rhythm said:
NorthernStar said:
my point is the fact that they could've had 1 million extra sales, but lost those to the used market. It was simply an example of how the used market is costing devs a lot of money.
By that kind of dodgy accounting they could also claim that it costs them money when people lend games for friends to play. Or have their friends around and let them play the game. A friend lent my brother Assassin's Creed II just recently; both my brother and I played it. Did we just cost Ubisoft two purchases?
no because you weren't paying money to do so, people buying used ARE. And yeah im behind content creators getting money for what they make.
So by your logic it's okay (moral issues aside) to pirate the game because I won't be be spending any money to play the game. Can you spot the fallacy here?
nope. Your not spending money either way. Sure piracy is illegal and you will get roshambo'd for that. But people who pirate EVERYTHING probably weren't going to be a consumer in the first place. I long ago gave up arguing against them because their thieves and theres no rationalizing with them.

Compared to a consumer trying to save a few bucks by giving money to people who have nothing to do with the game. Which is a shame because in doing the decent thing and paying they payed the wrong people, and if more people actually bought first hand the industry would be much healthier, and more risky titles would be being made.

Which is a shame in my eyes.

But by all means you go ahead and save your 5 bucks and watch developers fail. Hope that will be fun for you.
Oh, knock off the superiority act. Buying games new doesn't put you on a moral high ground. I've bought 8 new games this year and 1 used. I have a friend that is basically the opposite. Guess what? I'm not better than him. Having more money=/=better person.
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,864
0
41
Oh good, this thread again. Could you have sounded more arrogant in your original post, assuming that we're all idiots who've never thought to search the market?

I treat games the same way I do with music: if I know the artist will deliver a solid album, I'll pay, but I wouldn't buy an album by some one-hit wonder that will be the one good single and 13 filler tracks.

Likewise, a game series like Ratchet & Clank which I love, I will get on day of release, because I get the value for my money. On the other hand, paying forty quid for a thirty hour exercise in boredom like Dead Island? Sod that, I borrowed it from a friend.

Here's the point: games are ridiculously expensive. And a lot of them are seriously not worth it. Like, a lot of them.

I bought Guitar Hero 5 and breezed through almost every song on expert in the first day, because the product was ridiculously watered down to appeal to the broadest audience. So now I'm forty quid down and I'm just supposed to live with it?

To hell with that, I took it back to the store with my receipt, used the store credit to get two used games, finished them and traded them in for store credit. I've learned my lesson: I'll never buy a first-hand GH game again.

Ain't even sorry.
 

darthotaku

New member
Aug 20, 2010
686
0
0
every used game has already been bought new once. that means that the money from it has already gone to the publishers. is it stupid to buy used cars? is it stupid to buy used books? the game companies only say "we don't get money from used games" because they assume they are entitled to profits made from games regardless. imagine if toyota sued you because you bought one of their cars used. it'd be a worse business decision than their cars with breaks that didn't work.
 

Iwata

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,333
0
0
RedEyesBlackGamer said:
bahumat42 said:
Shamanic Rhythm said:
bahumat42 said:
Shamanic Rhythm said:
NorthernStar said:
my point is the fact that they could've had 1 million extra sales, but lost those to the used market. It was simply an example of how the used market is costing devs a lot of money.
By that kind of dodgy accounting they could also claim that it costs them money when people lend games for friends to play. Or have their friends around and let them play the game. A friend lent my brother Assassin's Creed II just recently; both my brother and I played it. Did we just cost Ubisoft two purchases?
no because you weren't paying money to do so, people buying used ARE. And yeah im behind content creators getting money for what they make.
So by your logic it's okay (moral issues aside) to pirate the game because I won't be be spending any money to play the game. Can you spot the fallacy here?
nope. Your not spending money either way. Sure piracy is illegal and you will get roshambo'd for that. But people who pirate EVERYTHING probably weren't going to be a consumer in the first place. I long ago gave up arguing against them because their thieves and theres no rationalizing with them.

Compared to a consumer trying to save a few bucks by giving money to people who have nothing to do with the game. Which is a shame because in doing the decent thing and paying they payed the wrong people, and if more people actually bought first hand the industry would be much healthier, and more risky titles would be being made.

Which is a shame in my eyes.

But by all means you go ahead and save your 5 bucks and watch developers fail. Hope that will be fun for you.
Oh, knock off the superiority act. Buying games new doesn't put you on a moral high ground. I've bought 8 new games this year and 1 used. I have a friend that is basically the opposite. Guess what? I'm not better than him. Having more money=/=better person.
~

What he said. For every used game I buy, I buy three or four new. But just as I don't feel like I'm ripping anyone off when I buy a used game, I also don't feel all high and mighty when I buy a new game.
 

CM156_v1legacy

Revelation 9:6
Mar 23, 2011
3,997
0
0
bahumat42 said:
CM156 said:
bahumat42 said:
Shamanic Rhythm said:
NorthernStar said:
my point is the fact that they could've had 1 million extra sales, but lost those to the used market. It was simply an example of how the used market is costing devs a lot of money.
By that kind of dodgy accounting they could also claim that it costs them money when people lend games for friends to play. Or have their friends around and let them play the game. A friend lent my brother Assassin's Creed II just recently; both my brother and I played it. Did we just cost Ubisoft two purchases?
no because you weren't paying money to do so, people buying used ARE. And yeah im behind content creators getting money for what they make.
You mean like they do when the game sells the first time? Yeah. I don't think any of us damn them for that.
yeah 1x 60 dollars. This isnt about whether or not you paid for a thing.Its who the moneys going to and people buying used to save a tiny bit of money have it all go to a worthless middle man.

So i genuinely think anyone who primarily games via used games, doesnt really love gaming enough to reward the people making the damn things.
First off, might I recommend using the shift key for the word "I" and spelling it "Doesn't"? Remember, punctuation saves lives.

Second, yes. It is FULLY about who got paid for the thing. Why are video games so special that they need to be treated differently than any other form of media? You are ignoring this. Also, I love your line about not loving gaming. I'm sorry, but what? That reeks of ad hominem.
 

Rawne1980

New member
Jul 29, 2011
4,144
0
0
There is one thing people still overlook when it comes to people that buy used games.

I'll take myself and the people I know as an example.

Now, I don't buy used anymore purely because I only game on my PC and I can get cheap enough games on Amazon.

However.

I did buy used when I had my 360.

The games I got used I had no intention of buying new. If used sales were not around I wouldn't have got the games at all. The developer/publishers would not have made any money out of me at all anyway. The same goes for my friends. We got them used because they were cheap and we thought "why not". No way would have paid full price.

As it stands now I wait a few months after a games released until I see it on Amazon for around £10 or less. It's very rare I will buy a game on release at full price and by the end of this year will only have done so 4 times, Deus Ex, Space Marine, Skyrim and ToR.

Any other game I feel like buying, Batman, Assassins Creed and Saints Row I will get in the January sales or later next year when they are going at a fraction of the price.

I've got no intention at all of buying any other games this year beside Skyrim and ToR. Were I still using my 360 I may have got a few used like Battlefield 3 or MW3 that I otherwise wouldn't have paid for.

May seem like a backwards way to do things but I don't buy games to support the people that make them or i'd buy all my games at full whack. I buy games to entertain myself and pass the time which is why I usually buy them cheap.
 

Proverbial Jon

Not evil, just mildly malevolent
Nov 10, 2009
2,093
0
0
Da Orky Man said:
segataDC said:
Kids nowadays don't like to keep their games and build a collection, they game, sell and trade games on a regular basis.
No, the kids YOU know do that. Ihave an overall collection of aroud 65 games, mostly older pctitles with my 360 collecion. I have traded in two games inentire life, which were partculary bad Wii games.
I agree. I'm quite a hoarder when it comes to digital media. On last count I had in the region of 195 games, ranging from PS1, PS2, PS3, Xbox, Xbox 360, Gamecube, DS and 3DS. This has taken me in the region of 10 to 15 years to build and the vast majority have been used games.

It pains me to let go of any of my games unless, like you said, they are truly terrible. I've been known to buy games back again some years later because I regreted trading them in.

Blue Hero said:
Some people don't wanna buy things online. If I want to play a game, I want to play it now. I don't wanna wait a few weeks for it to arrive.
When I pre-order brand new games through Amazon.co.uk, they tend to arrive on the day of release if not the day before. I never have to wait for online puchases, and it's cheaper!

GundamSentinel said:
SirBryghtside said:
-It's easier to find old games in trade-in stores.
Yes! If I can find games I was looking for for years in a decent state and with a small price tag it makes my day. Some shops always have amazing finds.
Absolutely. Most of my games are pre-owned, either from a local shop or from eBay if they're a little tricky to find. But my love for a lot of games were kick started by picking up a used game completely by chance in a shop. Silent Hill 2 was unknown to me before I discovered it in my local Gamestation. I've never looked back.
 

MorphingDragon

New member
Apr 17, 2009
566
0
0
bahumat42 said:
yeah 1x 60 dollars. This isnt about whether or not you paid for a thing.Its who the moneys going to and people buying used to save a tiny bit of money have it all go to a worthless middle man.

So i genuinely think anyone who primarily games via used games, doesnt really love gaming enough to reward the people making the damn things.
Well then why don't you buy games directly from the studio then if you support them so much?

Oh wait you can't.

Its like a problem of a misbehaving child, you want to reward them for good behaviour but they never behave so you never reward them.
 
Apr 24, 2008
3,912
0
0
The vast majority of games aren't worth hanging on to.

At the point where they stop being fun and start being plastic clutter, why would you keep them knowing full well you could save money by trading them against your next purchase?

Used games are big-biz because it's a system that makes sense. It's also the sole reason I go to brick-and-mortar games shops at all.
 

MorphingDragon

New member
Apr 17, 2009
566
0
0
bahumat42 said:
RedEyesBlackGamer said:
bahumat42 said:
Shamanic Rhythm said:
bahumat42 said:
Shamanic Rhythm said:
NorthernStar said:
my point is the fact that they could've had 1 million extra sales, but lost those to the used market. It was simply an example of how the used market is costing devs a lot of money.
By that kind of dodgy accounting they could also claim that it costs them money when people lend games for friends to play. Or have their friends around and let them play the game. A friend lent my brother Assassin's Creed II just recently; both my brother and I played it. Did we just cost Ubisoft two purchases?
no because you weren't paying money to do so, people buying used ARE. And yeah im behind content creators getting money for what they make.
So by your logic it's okay (moral issues aside) to pirate the game because I won't be be spending any money to play the game. Can you spot the fallacy here?
nope. Your not spending money either way. Sure piracy is illegal and you will get roshambo'd for that. But people who pirate EVERYTHING probably weren't going to be a consumer in the first place. I long ago gave up arguing against them because their thieves and theres no rationalizing with them.

Compared to a consumer trying to save a few bucks by giving money to people who have nothing to do with the game. Which is a shame because in doing the decent thing and paying they payed the wrong people, and if more people actually bought first hand the industry would be much healthier, and more risky titles would be being made.

Which is a shame in my eyes.

But by all means you go ahead and save your 5 bucks and watch developers fail. Hope that will be fun for you.
Oh, knock off the superiority act. Buying games new doesn't put you on a moral high ground. I've bought 8 new games this year and 1 used. I have a friend that is basically the opposite. Guess what? I'm not better than him. Having more money=/=better person.
its not about having more money
its about spending the money the right way. I often spend a bit more for local producers to survive by not having something luxury around the home. Its all about how you spend the money you have. What you chose to do with it defines how much you care.
Being vague is almost as much fun as this other thing...
 

RagTagBand

New member
Jul 7, 2011
497
0
0
You know you're dealing with an unreasonable nerd when their opening argument is "Kids nowadays! They aren't interested in meticulously hoarding games into a useless egocentric collection!"

I've in inadvertently got a very small collection of PS1 games, games I never play, games no one will ever play again...unless I -sell- them, Otherwise they will simply end up in the trash when I need more space.
 

The Funslinger

Corporate Splooge
Sep 12, 2010
6,150
0
0
tahrey said:
I don't always buy used games, but when I do, I buy classics that I missed first time round, for like £10 / $15. Also works well as a christmas/birthday present gambit if I know someone who missed said game but always wanted to play it.
Was that a meme reference? It fit so naturally I couldn't tell...

OT: Shall we not feed the trolls? He claimed stores sell used games full price, gave one shitty example and then used a string of disjointed logic. The trademark warped grin here can be seen from space, me thinks.