ACTA is worded to make it illegal for you to view any website. Since you have to download a copy of every image to your computer to even view it, just loading the escapist is enough to ban you from the internet.SimuLord said:Love the foil-hat crowd, really. Since I don't pirate, file-share, or use P2P networks (except for their lawfully intended purpose, ie Skype), I'm not so worried about the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Conference or ACTA bringing Hulkamania down on me.
First step? More like a fucking marathon to 1984. This is absolutely terrible, and if it wasn't a treaty would be breaking several pre-existing US laws, and presumably their equivalents in other countries.HG131 said:Is flawed your way of saying the first step to 1984?zala-taichou said:The method is flawed, the goal is flawed. Pirates contribute more to the entertainment industry than non-pirates. When will they realize?
I'll bet money the responsible parties already have their fingers on the "shut down" button, ready to "temporarily" discontinue all current service to all of their customers and locking them into a very small walled garden that will, as time passes, slowly gain more content as deals are struck between the ISPs and content providers.Woodsey said:This is going to hit everyone with a computer and a net connection in the concerned countries. I'll eat my own face if they manage to properly enforce this.
Stop trying to incite fear. Don't even pretend to act like that isn't what you're doing, either.HG131 said:Do you have a single copyrighted song, picture or video on your computer? Do you ever view videos on Youtube that have copyrighted music? If so, you'll be breaking the law. Still so sure it won't effect you?SimuLord said:Love the foil-hat crowd, really. Since I don't pirate, file-share, or use P2P networks (except for their lawfully intended purpose, ie Skype), I'm not so worried about the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Conference or ACTA bringing Hulkamania down on me.No there won't. It's all back room bullshit. Most people will never know. Besides, people don't protest anymore, they'll just riot.Timotei said:I don't think this will pass. But if it does, there will be MASSIVE protest rallies in every capital city in the world with access to internet. We'd probably see one of the biggest protest movements since the civil rights and Hippie rallies, all calling for the demise of this treaty.
And what's to stop this from becoming bigger? Already this is violating many nations' civil rights, so what's to stop those enforcing ACTA from adding more amendments onto the treaty to give them more control over the web and public as a whole?
Time for the revolution!Shale_Dirk said:Oh wow, I just realized that all forms of streaming websites, including pornographic ones, will be illegal.
Effective next month: masturbating is punishable by law.
... Hes not trying to incite fear, that is, literally, how ACTA is worded. Three accusations of copyright infringement and you're in jail and permanently banned from ever having internet access.Frequen-Z said:Stop trying to incite fear. Don't even pretend to act like that isn't what you're doing, either.HG131 said:Do you have a single copyrighted song, picture or video on your computer? Do you ever view videos on Youtube that have copyrighted music? If so, you'll be breaking the law. Still so sure it won't effect you?SimuLord said:Love the foil-hat crowd, really. Since I don't pirate, file-share, or use P2P networks (except for their lawfully intended purpose, ie Skype), I'm not so worried about the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Conference or ACTA bringing Hulkamania down on me.No there won't. It's all back room bullshit. Most people will never know. Besides, people don't protest anymore, they'll just riot.Timotei said:I don't think this will pass. But if it does, there will be MASSIVE protest rallies in every capital city in the world with access to internet. We'd probably see one of the biggest protest movements since the civil rights and Hippie rallies, all calling for the demise of this treaty.
And what's to stop this from becoming bigger? Already this is violating many nations' civil rights, so what's to stop those enforcing ACTA from adding more amendments onto the treaty to give them more control over the web and public as a whole?
You're trying to make it sound like if I so much as search for an image that happens to have been copyrighted, guys in black suits are gonna come and lock me into a fucking hole for the rest of my life.
Tone your god damn posts down. You're overreacting.
Wait, does that include copyrighted material that has been purchased? If yes, that's bad. If no, that's really terrible wording. Hopefully enough to see the Treaty thrown out, but we'll see.HG131 said:Do you have a single copyrighted song, picture or video on your computer? Do you ever view videos on Youtube that have copyrighted music? If so, you'll be breaking the law. Still so sure it won't effect you?SimuLord said:Love the foil-hat crowd, really. Since I don't pirate, file-share, or use P2P networks (except for their lawfully intended purpose, ie Skype), I'm not so worried about the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Conference or ACTA bringing Hulkamania down on me.No there won't. It's all back room bullshit. Most people will never know. Besides, people don't protest anymore, they'll just riot.Timotei said:I don't think this will pass. But if it does, there will be MASSIVE protest rallies in every capital city in the world with access to internet. We'd probably see one of the biggest protest movements since the civil rights and Hippie rallies, all calling for the demise of this treaty.
And what's to stop this from becoming bigger? Already this is violating many nations' civil rights, so what's to stop those enforcing ACTA from adding more amendments onto the treaty to give them more control over the web and public as a whole?
Guys in black suits won't come to your house. What they will do instead is use an intricate system. 3 strikes of having copyrighted material saved on your computer and you're banned from the internet.Frequen-Z said:Stop trying to incite fear. Don't even pretend to act like that isn't what you're doing, either.
You're trying to make it sound like if I so much as search for an image that happens to have been copyrighted, guys in black suits are gonna come and lock me into a fucking hole for the rest of my life.
Tone your god damn posts down. You're overreacting.
Yes, it does. You have to copy it to even have it. Which you're not allowed to do under ACTA.Valkyrie101 said:Wait, does that include copyrighted material that has been purchased? If yes, that's bad. If no, that's really terrible wording. Hopefully enough to see the Treaty thrown out, but we'll see.