by tomorrow, mostly all of you will be breaking the law.

Recommended Videos

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
Shale_Dirk said:
Seldon2639 said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Can someone cite me where this violates a right we actually have (rather than imagine) or how "human rights" are offended by anything they propose? Unless "complete autonomy from consequences or oversight of our behavior" is a human right, I believe you have no leg to stand on.
4th amendment.
Allow me to rephrase:

What part of the proposal of the ACTA violates the fourth amendment, or is substantially different from police procedures in the investigation of any and all crimes under current state, federal, and common law?
 

Gudrests

New member
Mar 29, 2010
1,204
0
0
rockyoumonkeys said:
This definitely sounds like one of those things that could never happen.
but it is happening...and when i does....there will be hell to pay. this is somthing /b/ has already taken up on... lets not get into this but when /b/ is right....there will be problems
 

Firia

New member
Sep 17, 2007
1,945
0
0
chinangel said:
it won't be signed until late september and the odds of it passing are SO small. Microscopically small. Why? Because it effects too many people. It's just idiotic so it won't get out.
Really. You think the number of people it affects has anything to do with whether it will pass or not? Are you doing anything right now to prevent that? No? Neither am I. I've signed a petition, sure, but what can I do against lobbiest groups with their millions of dollars? My signature doesn't have that much power. Neither does yours.

Yes, if the millions of people this treaty would affect rallied, it surely would fail. But so little is actually known about the treaty (almost said "bill"), that so few people will actually act. And the people that do act will only be a fraction of those that know.

People didn't act strongly when the Patriot Act (USA) passed. It screwed over several human rights in the name of protection, and it upset millions that read and understood what it was. But did anyone DO anything about it? No. America is a welcome mat of complacency in the 21st century; come, walk all over us. We'll complain, but that's the worst of it.
 

Timotei

The Return of T-Bomb
Apr 21, 2009
5,162
0
0
HG131 said:
Do you have a single copyrighted song, picture or video on your computer? Do you ever view videos on Youtube that have copyrighted music? If so, you'll be breaking the law. Still so sure it won't effect you?
This also goes for anyone who has downloaded freeware onto their computer. This includes Linux and browsers. So under this treaty, all users of Firefox, Google Chrome, IE8, Opera, Safari, and any other web browser which people downloaded form the internet will be liable for punishment. This would also include anti-virus software programs, games, chat programs, and anything which you download that you don't have to pay for are now tickets for criminal prosecution.

You'd be looking at possibly >90% of all internet users, that's over a billion people. Passing this treaty and prosecuting everyone would be so insanely expensive the people in charge would become bankrupt just from the cost of searching and evidence gathering. There is NO way that anybody will be able to pay for this.
 

Cynical skeptic

New member
Apr 19, 2010
799
0
0
Frequen-Z said:
Cynical skeptic said:
Seldon2639 said:
Greetings hip detractor. ACTA operates on a accusation basis.

Which means they don't need to prove anything to ban anyone from the internet. They don't need probable cause. Since the wording is so... sickening, all they have to do is know that all computer techology "transfers" files by copying and recording, thus, everyone who's ever touched a computer with internet access is in violation at least three times.

How many times have you loaded the escapist's logo today?
You do your username a great injustice with these posts.

What do you think is more likely;-
- Treaty is passed, everyone who fits your criteria (practically everyone) is 'banned from the internet'.
- Treaty is passed, barely enforced, maybe one or two example casses
- Treaty is not passed
- Treaty is passed, but works differently to how you propose, and really doesn't make much of a different to us.
-It passes, Time warner/aol/disney becomes the only corporation capable of offering anything resembling internet access, only to their websites, as ACTA makes it illegal for anyone (including ISPs) to copy anything they do not own or have rights to. Since you cannot view anything without downloading (copying) it, the internet as it exists right now becomes illegal.

They've tried this before. You might not remember the whole net neutrality business.

Like I said, the biggest problem is the treaty seems reasonable to one without computer knowledge.
 

PessimistOwl

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2010
275
0
21
Timotei said:
HG131 said:
Do you have a single copyrighted song, picture or video on your computer? Do you ever view videos on Youtube that have copyrighted music? If so, you'll be breaking the law. Still so sure it won't effect you?
This also goes for anyone who has downloaded freeware onto their computer. This includes Linux and browsers. So under this treaty, all users of Firefox, Google Chrome, IE8, Opera, Safari, and any other web browser which people downloaded form the internet will be liable for punishment. This would also include anti-virus software programs, games, chat programs, and anything which you download that you don't have to pay for are now tickets for criminal prosecution.

You'd be looking at possibly >90% of all internet users, that's over a billion people. Passing this treaty and prosecuting everyone would be so insanely expensive the people in charge would become bankrupt just from the cost of searching and evidence gathering. There is NO way that anybody will be able to pay for this.
Remember, where there is money, there is a way
 

SnakeF

New member
Apr 25, 2009
300
0
0
Irridium said:
Well, in case the worst happens, I just want to let you all know that I love all of you.
I love you too man... I'm gonna miss your Dancing Hobo... *sobs at the thought of loosing TF2 online* Okay, crying's over. I'm going to hide all my porn

O.T. Yeah despite that. I really doubt this treaty will be as bad as some people are making it out to be.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
It seems to me like this is one of those things that they'll try to selectively enforce.
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
I hope to god Anonymous takes down the asshattery that is the ACTA. They've apparently declared a state of war.
 

guardian001

New member
Oct 20, 2008
519
0
0
tomtom94 said:
Copyright law has its ups and downs.
Actually current copyright law pretty is pretty much only "downs." I dunno how we managed to fuck that one up so badly. I think it happened right around the time when copyright holders decided they were above the law and the courts agreed with them.

henritje said:
besides nosing around in m PC is forbidden by law
ACTA is in international treaty and can thus bypass the laws of any Country which has signed it.
 

Brotherofwill

New member
Jan 25, 2009
2,566
0
0
tomtom94 said:
Copyright law has its ups and downs.

Welcome to a new low for capitalism, everyone.
New low? What about the industrial revolution?

I get why some people are scared but it's hardly a doomsday scenario. 2012 on the other hand...
 

Shale_Dirk

New member
Mar 23, 2010
201
0
0
Seldon2639 said:
Shale_Dirk said:
Seldon2639 said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Can someone cite me where this violates a right we actually have (rather than imagine) or how "human rights" are offended by anything they propose? Unless "complete autonomy from consequences or oversight of our behavior" is a human right, I believe you have no leg to stand on.
4th amendment.
Allow me to rephrase:

What part of the proposal of the ACTA violates the fourth amendment, or is substantially different from police procedures in the investigation of any and all crimes under current state, federal, and common law?
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/april/tradoc_146029.pdf

Article 2.18, subsection 3, Option 2: (pg. 20)

[Each Party recognizes that some persons use the services of third parties, including online service providers, for engaging in intellectual property rights infringements.

(a) In this respect, each Party shall provide limitation on the [liability of] [ scope of civil remedies available against an] on-line service provider for infringing activities56 that occur by:

(iii) The storage of information provided by the recipient of the service or at the request of the recipient of the service.
 

yoyo13rom

New member
Oct 19, 2009
1,004
0
0
2012 Wont Happen said:
With U.S. involvement in this treaty, the only thing I can say is this- is our government even trying to appear Democratic anymore? Is it even trying to hide the anti-citizen, pro-elite, excessively Authoritarian stance it has adopted?

Some of the other signing nations, from the perspective of an outsider, seem to have some redeeming quality still, but really the best thing I had to say about the U.S. before this is "well, at least companies can't just rummage through all my information on a whim". Now, it seems they'll be able to.
Kair said:
200 years ago it was illegal for a man with dark skin to look a man with white skin in the eyes.
For a second there I though that you guys were one and the same person(after glimpsing at your red avatars).

And to think that Kollega is right between each other makes this even more hilarious XD(you do know he's from the Russian Federation).

Anyway, to "2012 Wont Happen":
To be bluntly sincere I(I'm not so certain if many other Europeans share the same thought), don't believe in Democracy any more. It's not because of the U.S, it's because of how fucked up it's in all other democratic countries. It's good on paper just like communism, but in practice, it's not quite what it should be...
Although hats down for making democracy seem so real and uncorrupted in your country(your politicians are quite the actors).


Furburt said:
I'd imagine it'll be a bit of a non issue. Mainly because the act, in its current wording, is almost totally unenforceable. By doing this, they'd force ISP's to shut down the accounts of at least 70% of Western internet users, which is just insane. There's no way America and other western nations, stalwarts of the free market as they are, would risk causing such a huge cash leak in the internet industry.

Now, I'm not saying don't be worried, or don't fight it, but I doubt this is the foretold end of the internet, just based on how deranged anyone would have to be to actually fully enforce it.
I beg to differ(although for all our sakes I hope I'm wrong and you're right)!
The U.S Government has been trying to get a slice of pie for almost a decade(pie=money from the totally free medium known as the internet).
I remember that back in 2006(or about then) that they were all hammering about "Net Neutrality".
Form my point of view ACTA and Net Neutrality have about the same devastating consequences.
One would think they'd give up after that incident, but guess they're persistent.
And don't worry that the law might be unenforceable. There have been a lot of cases(or at least here in my country) where the law was unenforceable/would have automatically made 70% of the population guilty for breaking it(in other world a contradicting law that put you in a lose-lose situation). And all just to get a bigger "piece of the pie"(pie=money in absolutely any form).
If you are wondering about those lose-lose laws: they're form the driving regulation, and because of how certain parking spaces are illegally placed right close to intersections or places where you are forbidden to park, this makes you obligated to break the law in one way or an other.
The policemen and those how enforce it are always right, and if they catch you and they consider that you should be punished, you get a ticket. It all depends on if they're close and what mood they're in.

Man, what a long rant!
 

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,392
0
0
Jack and Calumon said:
Yep, and in preparation I have ripped all of my CDs onto my computer and loaded them onto my MP3 player. Besides, they're only fine tuning it. It won't come into practice for a while. Government laws never do. Except Marshall law. Man these sentences are so disjointed.

Calumon: ACTA? Sounds like someone trying to finish off a Pokemon move before coughing!

Red: Go Pikachu! Quick ACTA!
... now there are three of you? >_>

OT: Meh. I don't care much for laws anyway. Just or unjust doesn't matter to me, only morally right or wrong...
 

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
Shale_Dirk said:
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/april/tradoc_146029.pdf

Article 2.18, subsection 3, Option 2: (pg. 20)

[Each Party recognizes that some persons use the services of third parties, including online service providers, for engaging in intellectual property rights infringements.

(a) In this respect, each Party shall provide limitation on the [liability of] [ scope of civil remedies available against an] on-line service provider for infringing activities56 that occur by:

(iii) The storage of information provided by the recipient of the service or at the request of the recipient of the service.


Limiting the liability of ISPs for the illegal action of their customers is something you find violates either the constitution or "human rights"?
 

RooftopAssassin

New member
Sep 13, 2009
356
0
0
AndyFromMonday said:
The 2010 act if anybody cares:

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5425059/ACTA_Agreement_leaked_
Heh. The Pirate Bay. Irony.

OT: I'd hate to break it to you, but it's all bad and no good. It's hardly believable it will pass though. I also think people are dead wrong about protesting. I'll be the one of the first protesting if it does pass. I've already written the President, my Congressmen, my Senators, my mayor, and my governor. That's all I can do.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
SnakeF said:
Irridium said:
Well, in case the worst happens, I just want to let you all know that I love all of you.
I love you too man... I'm gonna miss your Dancing Hobo... *sobs at the thought of loosing TF2 online* Okay, crying's over. I'm going to hide all my porn

O.T. Yeah despite that. I really doubt this treaty will be as bad as some people are making it out to be.
Its ok, Hobo's got a plan!

Hobo: I'ma kill all these fucks using my shotgun.

 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
tomtom94 said:
Skullkid4187 said:
Where is the Republican party on this there is no way in hell they would let it pass
Don't you see? The political parties have no choice. It's called lobbying.

If the parties don't try and stop file-sharing, then Hollywood will stop giving them what little money they pay in tax anyway.
And then the government can arrest them for tax evasion and people who weren't born with business suits on can start making all the decisions. Everyone wins! So why shouldn't the republicans vote no on ACTA again?