Whatever the polls might say, it's not empirical data. It's a fraction of the public's opinion, which doesn't say anything. Anyways, I completely agree with you. When talking about legalizing all drugs, I meant some posts here I saw earlier. Someone was saying everything should be legalized, including heroine and other drugs that make you physically dependent "because I can do what I want to my body". I would have nothing against the legislation of acid or xtc, only drugs that would make you a danger against yourself or society.Red Right Hand said:The polls, at the moment, suggest that it's going to pass.Dungus said:Although I would fully support the regulation act, as I am a marihuana user myself, I think there is some work to be done on both sides of the argument. On the side of the no-voters, I'm hearing a lot of hypocritical arguments and statements that just aren't true, or at least not completely. While on the side of the yes-voters, I'm sensing a lot of nonchalance, like the dude in the video who explains he drove under the influence and "nothing happened so it's okay". Or like I've seen some people say; "every drug should be legal cause its my choice what I want to do with my body". That's at least as stupid of an argument like saying weed causes 50-70% more cancer-causing, which it is obviously not.
The efforts being made to make people vote no are really mind-blowing to me. I cannot understand how people watching the ad the dude in the video talks about could be bought, but I'm 99.99% sure Prop 19 won't pass.
I keep forgetting most people are narrow-minded, especially when it comes to drugs (think of the children!). On the other hand, the fact that people are now able to vote on the subject is definitely a step forward already.
Also, two points;
1) Why do you think the view that every drug should be legalised is stupid? Myself, I don't think that every drug should legalised, but it should be judged on addictiveness rather than danger. It all comes down to personal control. If you're constantly taking marijuana or ecstasy or other non-addictive drugs, then you're still in control of yourself. However, in the depth of a heroin addiction, you no longer want to take the drug but rather need to take it. This is where I think the boundaries for where politicians can ban a substance should come in.
2) Driving under the influence of marijuana. I know you'll probably view this as an outright lie, however, I, along with most of my friends, have driven stoned and there has not been one accident, not even nearly one. Everytime I drive stoned i'm fully attentive and safe, I drive more slowly than I do when i'm sober. Now i'm not saying "everybody spark-up and drive, it's ok!" But the stigma attached to driving when high is pretty unfounded, in my own experience.
I also agree with your second point. I just meant that it's really not an argument helping legalizing marihuana. I've driven stoned a lot of times, mostly at night (but I never drink and drive) and I have also never had any accident. I know I am capable to drive while high, but still, it's illegal to drive under the influence. It should be, theres a lot of incompetent drivers on the road already, who are sober.