Call of Duty: Elite Could Make Similar Services "A Necessity"

Recommended Videos

Marshall Honorof

New member
Feb 16, 2011
2,200
0
0
Call of Duty: Elite Could Make Similar Services "A Necessity"


Activision believes player services like Call of Duty: Elite could keep franchises profitable for years to come.

When Modern Warfare 3 and Battlefield 3 hit shelves later this year, fans will likely argue the merits and flaws of both games until the fourth installments come out. One topic of contention will be Call of Duty: Elite vs. Battlelog, the social network/content management services that will accompany each game. Activision predicts that no matter which service comes out on top, though, the comprehensive player management service is here to stay. The company believes that five years from now, every high-profile multiplayer game will have to embrace a similar system in order to stay competitive.

"We believe that a 24/7, year-round services strategy that broadens the game experience beyond just playing is going to be a necessity," says Jamie Berger, an Activision VP. "Right now, it's an option but in three to five years, it won't be. To support a diverse player base, you will have to have a services and ongoing content strategy." Activision's own Call of Duty: Elite will be a paid service that gives subscribers early access to DLC and exclusive ancillary content. Furthermore, it will give players access to a social network of like-minded CoD players. EA's Battlelog, on the other hand, will be a free service that provides social networking and matchmaking; players will have to buy DLC separately.

By strengthening players' social ties and making it easy to manage their game add-ons, Berger is confident that these services will keep players invested in both individual games and their parent IPs. "Elite is about Call of Duty being bigger than ever five years from now and laying the groundwork for that," he explains. Meanwhile, EA is prepping FIFA 12 and Need for Speed for similar services.

Social networks and regular content packs have worked wonders for MMOs, but Call of Duty: Elite and Battlelog will likely determine whether they can present a workable model for online first-person shooters. If these services end up being profitable, franchise-specific social networks could become a fixture of multiplayer gaming.

Source: MCV [http://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/activision-social-networks-a-necessity-for-gaming]


Permalink
 

Kapol

Watch the spinning tails...
May 2, 2010
1,431
0
0
Eh, I think this is just them trying to pump out their idea and make it seem like it's better then it is. I think the whole thing is fairly silly... people aren't going to want to have 10 different services for different games to have to sign-up/pay for and monitor constantly.
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Eh, doubt it. For starters I can't see this doing well, pretty much everyone I know who plays CoD wants to play CoD, not faff about with this shite, especially at extra cost. Also, I don't really see how this bears on other franchises. Activision can do what they like and no one will really notice, except for maybe EA. I simply don't think most developers are that interested in attempting to compete at a large scale with Activision and it's towering success, as being smaller means that similar services won't be as successful. If there aren't enough people using it then it will stagnate and die, and it won't make a lot of money at all.
 

ddq5

I wonder what the character limi
Jun 18, 2009
415
0
0
This is known as a "bad precedent". Also "extortion". They've realized they're selling digital crack and they won't stop until they have ALL the moneys.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
READ: We think people are dumb enough to support our overworked franchises if we ask them to pay extra for them.

Meh, he is probably right. I don't doubt the next incarnation of MW will do fantastic in the sales department. I don't think they have a very good idea though. Lots of external services for no additional cost do the social networking and game stat tracking thing very well, for completely free.

I can't wait till Activision is no more, it'll be a long while, but it will come. EA too. I mean, there was a time Nintendo was an undisputed force in the game industry, not so much anymore.
 

rsvp42

New member
Jan 15, 2010
897
0
0
I have no problem with free services (like BF3's apparently), but having to pay for extra stat tracking? Seems like the sort of thing that should just be included in a sequel for free. I thought that was part of the whole iterative improvements thing that endless sequels have going for them. What's next, pay extra to see match scores and K/D ratios?
 

Magicmad5511

New member
May 26, 2011
637
0
0
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Bungie do this for Halo?
I may be misunderstanding but it seems like a similar thing of being able to keep up with your stats, news and to connect with others. Bungie.net did that for free.
Not a good move when not only has it already been done but they did it for less.
 

Rawne1980

New member
Jul 29, 2011
4,144
0
0
Baresark said:
READ: We think people are dumb enough to support our overworked franchises if we ask them to pay extra for them.
The problem is ... they are right.

People ARE dumb enough to pay for it and thats exactly what they will do.

You will even have the more vocal CoD fans telling us how fantastic this 'ELITE' is and we should all be paying Activision to use it.
 

Lightning Delight

New member
Apr 21, 2011
351
0
0
Is it just me, or is Activision choosing the strangest things to declare as necessities? First there was the "If you aren't running on 60fps, you may as well not try," and now there is the "if you don't have online player management, you may as well not try." It just strikes me as a bit odd.
 

Rednog

New member
Nov 3, 2008
3,567
0
0
Rawne1980 said:
Baresark said:
READ: We think people are dumb enough to support our overworked franchises if we ask them to pay extra for them.
The problem is ... they are right.

People ARE dumb enough to pay for it and thats exactly what they will do.

You will even have the more vocal CoD fans telling us how fantastic this 'ELITE' is and we should all be paying Activision to use it.
Question:
Which is cheaper $50 or $60?
Honestly if you plan on getting all the DLC for CoD you actually would be stupid not to buy elite.
 

Owen Robertson

New member
Jul 26, 2011
545
0
0
They're necessities as in no game will be taken seriously without one, not necessities as in you need to buy it to play. If they try that horse-shit I'll have no problem going back to single-player ONLY games.
 

Michael Hirst

New member
May 18, 2011
552
0
0
Monthly fees for all games will only hurt games, there's a lot of people who won't pay for 2 MMO's why on earth would they want 6 different subscriptions to 6 shooters.

If it became the norm for a subscription service to be mandatory to play shooters (I know COD Elite isn't mandatory) I'd just go full hipster and hide in the indie market until it was safe to come out.

I can see people wanting a social experience from some of their games but usually we just want to go online kick some ass, have some fun and leave.

Personally I hope the whole COD Elite thing falls on its ass because it's a very stupid service to charge for, like spending £3 a month for Facebook or Steam.
 

Jiefu

New member
May 24, 2010
170
0
0
I'm kind of surprised Activision reps don't express years in Calls of Duty.
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,264
0
0
Guess who's not paying for either service?

<--THIS GUY!


Seriously, during a economic DEPRESSION these idiots roll out crap like this?

Are...they...high?
 

Rawne1980

New member
Jul 29, 2011
4,144
0
0
Rednog said:
Rawne1980 said:
Baresark said:
READ: We think people are dumb enough to support our overworked franchises if we ask them to pay extra for them.
The problem is ... they are right.

People ARE dumb enough to pay for it and thats exactly what they will do.

You will even have the more vocal CoD fans telling us how fantastic this 'ELITE' is and we should all be paying Activision to use it.
Question:
Which is cheaper $50 or $60?
Honestly if you plan on getting all the DLC for CoD you actually would be stupid not to buy elite.
You know you will still have to pay for DLC, plus the game and then pay for using Elite.

I'm not going to start the name game and abusing people but I do think Activision are milking their 'fans' and ripping them off and the fans are throwing money at them willingly and smiling while they do it.

Now if thats what they want to do then thats fine by me but you can count me and my sanity out.
 

Rednog

New member
Nov 3, 2008
3,567
0
0
Rawne1980 said:
You know you will still have to pay for DLC, plus the game and then pay for using Elite.
Please provide the proof for this.
(Hint you are absolutely wrong).
My proof: Go to point 10.
http://www.callofduty.com/elite/whats-included.html