Call of Duty: Future Warfare

Recommended Videos

silverbullet1989

New member
Jun 7, 2009
391
0
0
hey who knows, they've obviously got the money to do what they like now, they dont care about sticking 2 fingers up at fan bases. The next one could be called "call of duty: we dont need to try any more" or cod:wdnttam for short
 

Danish_4116

New member
Sep 15, 2009
149
0
0
Technically MW2 is Future Warfare, according to Wikipedia it is set in 2016 and seeing as it is currently 2009, 2016 is, therefore, the future.

Although, I think going too far into the future would be a bad move for CoD. It would be like Halo, except better.
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
Good morning blues said:
I also feel like IW would be more likely to revisit less commonly seen but still historical settings such as Korea, Vietnam, or 1980s Afghanistan. This is all idle speculation, however. None of us have any way of knowing.
That would be enjoyable.Especially Korea,since not no game to my knowledge has been about the war there.

P.S. Mercenaries doesn't count.
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
StigmataDiaboli said:
Call of Duty: Future Warfare actually came out this year, under the name KILLZONE 2...
Good call.The only thing is that a Cod game usually has smoother aiming.

I still love KZ2.
 

StigmataDiaboli

New member
May 18, 2009
716
0
0
RanD00M said:
StigmataDiaboli said:
Call of Duty: Future Warfare actually came out this year, under the name KILLZONE 2...
Good call.The only thing is that a Cod game usually has smoother aiming.

I still love KZ2.
Yeah I love it as well. It was the first thing me and my friend says when we saw gameplay footage of it. 'Infinity Ward are taking this a little more than modern aren't they? Oh wait...'
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,312
0
0
The only thing I can think of that would improve the franchise is World War one.
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
Muzza-Maaate said:
Oh yeah they plan to make the next game in the near 1000 year future. Hence why they finished Modern Warfare 2 with the obvious need to continue the story. It didn't end with killing Sheperd. You still gotta kill Makarov and get the Russians out of Washington before they fly 100 years into the future and make CoD: FW.

Modern Warfare 3 trailer leaked:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXDQloclpik

Must see!
siffty said:
did Any one actual pay attention to the end of mw2 isn't Russia sill in America and wtf happened to soap and that guy with the beard
Can you guys use spoilers if you're going to give away plot information? Go and read the forum rules.

I don't think there will be a "future" Warfare, although I disagree about infantry disapearing as some are talking about. You will always need a presence on the ground. The Americans thought they could do it without soldiers in the Balkans and again in Iraq but air power alone will not win or hold ground.

They are onto a good thing with MW, it won't be changing soon. Just look for different locals and enemies. China, South America etc. Its much better than WW2, which has grown boring, You could do other historic war zones though, maybe even get a bit controversial.

Imagine the Ghilies in the mist stealthing set in Vietnam but you are dodging Americans from Tiger squad who are executing whole villages. I'd buy it, although Americans get touchy about Vietnam, particularly if they are not portrayed as whiter than white.
 

Sulu

New member
Jul 7, 2009
438
0
0
WrongSprite said:
Kollega said:
Something tells me that SPESS MEHRENES is not exactly Infinity Ward's area of expertise. But wait - what if it were all-American SPESS MEHRENES in shining armour against dirty Russian Communazis taking over border colonies?! Yes, that would sell even better than MW2!

Good morning blues said:
or 1980s Afghanistan.
Great one. I imagine a campaign in this game. Who overly patriotic 20-something Americans would rather play as: Taliban or Soviet army?
I suppose it'd have to be Soviet, Taliban would be too edgy.

Actually you'd probably end up as one of the S.A.S in the country at the time, or something similar.
Haha yeah it is a CoD game afterall. Even if the SAS weren't historically there then IW would find a way to get a Captain Price in somewhere :)
 

weker

New member
May 27, 2009
1,372
0
0
i promised myself that if they make a new cod which is still modern warfare i wont buy it cuz they wont do anything new just like MW2
 

ejb626

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,322
0
0
Well the MW series is only set in the near-future that means its not far enough for us to have laser guns and super-fast spaceships yet not to mention the market if also flooded with futuristic shooters. Then again MW2 was in 2016 I mean how much further in the future can you go without weapons technology advancing? CoD should not go into the future though its supposed to be realistic.