We all have our favorite games, games whose value we have argued before others who do not share our love, and we are unabashed fans of these games (I have yet to be beaten when discussing the merits of Civilization II).
And then there are the games that we like, games that we had a lot of fun with, but not games that we considered to be the best we ever played (Assassin's Creed is the best example I can think of in my case). Yet, when I mention that such-and-such game was fun, I am labeled a fanboy, a title that paints me as a love-lorn supporter of said game.
Can I say that a game is a blast and maybe even point out the good bits without being called a fanboy? Or is doing so auto-condemnation to the ranks of fandom?
And then there are the games that we like, games that we had a lot of fun with, but not games that we considered to be the best we ever played (Assassin's Creed is the best example I can think of in my case). Yet, when I mention that such-and-such game was fun, I am labeled a fanboy, a title that paints me as a love-lorn supporter of said game.
Can I say that a game is a blast and maybe even point out the good bits without being called a fanboy? Or is doing so auto-condemnation to the ranks of fandom?