"Cannabis use under Licence" Proposes leading Scientist

Recommended Videos

Good morning blues

New member
Sep 24, 2008
2,664
0
0
I don't see how requiring a weed license would be any better than legalizing. What would they do in the licensing process ? would they teach people how to safely use one of the safest known drugs, or would they more be teaching people how to roll a sweet doobie?
 

brunothepig

New member
May 18, 2009
2,163
0
0
thenumberthirteen said:
brunothepig said:
It's difficult to spike someones drink with weed.
Unless it's a Mojito. Even then you'd just end up with leaves in your mouth. The worst that would happen there it they'd look like an Idiot as they try and spit them out.
Haha. I like that image... Alright.
It's difficult to successfully spike someones drink with weed.
 

brunothepig

New member
May 18, 2009
2,163
0
0
Agayek said:
brunothepig said:
And anyone caught slipping a drug to someone should be treated the same way you would treat someone who tried to poison someone. Flog the ************ and be done with it.

And anyone dumb enough to go outside on severe hallucinogenics deserves whatever the hell they get (whether that be getting shot by someone their harassing or getting arrested for drunk & disorderly conduct).

The stupid ones will take themselves out of the genepool pretty quick, and the rest will be left just fine.

It all comes down to my philosophy on crime and punishment more than anything else, really. I firmly believe the only valid response is to punish the offender, not the tool they used to offend. And that legal punishment should actually be punishment, not rehabilitation.
I do agree with what you're saying, but it doesn't repair the damage these people can cause. And I'd like to think that eventually people would stop using the damn things, but I know that almost definitely is untrue. So I want to keep the "hardcore" drugs illegal, not for the idiots that use them, but for innocents that are hurt/killed through no fault of their own.
 

SenseOfTumour

New member
Jul 11, 2008
4,514
0
0
Amazes me how many people think that legalising it would change anyone who tried weed into a slavering useless addict only capable of thinking about the next joint and the next snickers bar.

Sure some people lose control, and can't moderate their intake, just as in alcohol, or sugar.

I think we need to put legal and illegal aside for a moment. I have no stats to back this up, but I'd suggest that, just as most drinkers have a few drinks a couple of times a night, enjoy getting slightly buzzed and go about their life, most weed smokers have a couple of joints every now and then, relax and enjoy life.

My best friend used to work in insurance, and it was an eye opener to me how many well paid, high responsibility 30-50ish workers, including high management (pun not intended! ), used to dabble in the weed, and yet manage to go about their day and still operate.

Again, it's not as dangerous as alcohol or tobacco, and doesn't endanger others like they do. The reason it's illegal, is 'the public' think it's in some way less 'moral' than the legal highs, and that it would destroy the alcohol and tobacco industries as an alternative.

The tax thing is difficult, as it's fairly easy to grow yourself, unlike tobacco and alcohol.

I imagine they could make it cheap enough to make a stack of cash and yet not worth the hassle of maintaining an indoor garden however, after all, most of us won't brew our own beer or have a setup to distill spirits.

Oh and we do have paid assassins, although I don't know for sure which way they affect the economy, but the army is that. I'm not knocking the army here btw, they're generally honourable people who go into the career for the right reasons. However they're paid to kill people we don't like, in short.