Yeah, I get the impression that somewhere in some office, this guy was like "Fine, whatever, triangle flapjacks are banned! Are you happy now? Stop sending me these stupid reports!"Melon Hunter said:Given this paragraph from the article:
I'd love to believe this was an April Fool's joke accidentally published a week early, but it's probably not. The Health & Safety Executive must tear their hair out over cases like this.A spokesman for the Health and Safety Executive said: "We often come across half-baked decisions taken in the name of health and safety, but this one takes the biscuit."
You have to eat them to the tune of Zelda's LullabyPhasmal said:Am I the only one thinking of getting three triangle flapjacks and making a delicious Triforce?
I want flapjacks now.
OT: Well... isn't that silly.
This on the other hand is a good idea. Two people in my year were stabbed by pens. (I had anger management issues).Esotera said:Well there goes my business for shuriken-based biscuits. At this rate they will ban pens in school (which is probably a good idea because someone in my year was blinded by one).
Even so, it's a piece of food. That means they should ban apples and anything else that could hurt someone when thrown, it's just silly.JaceArveduin said:You know, this topic makes slightly more sense when you realize the Brit's flapjacks are actually some sort of oat-bar thing. Round my parts it's just a rarely used word for pancakes.
Since triangles can divide down fractally, you can make a literally infinite quantity of flapjack-y shuriken. O:GiantRaven said:With one square piece of flapjack, I can create two triangular pieces of devastating destructive glory, thus doubling my capability for injuring others.
I see no problem here.
Exactly my thought. You'd think the safest form was round only...The Artificially Prolonged said:But wait square flapjacks have more corners than triangle ones!!! The damn school administration has just put those poor kids in even deadlier peril than they where in before!
Except that a triangle's corners are sharper thanks to the shape's fewer number of sides compared to a quadrilateral, increasing their offensive potential by a significant margin. Even if the triangle in question happens to be obtuse, the two remaining acute corners will only be more perilous than ever for it. Maybe next time you'll do your research before demonizing the brave crusaders working to protect our children from the worldwide threat posed by triangular oat bars, you monster.Dragoon said:This has to be one of the most idiotically pointless things I've ever read, there is no logical explanation for why triangular shaped baked goods are more dangerous than square or rectangular ones. Hell they have one more corner to cause damage with so if anything they are more dangerous.
Well, no, because then they could be thrown like a discus. So, there would be no sharp points, but the flapjacks are now oaty frisbees of death! That could potentially be worse!Quaxar said:Exactly my thought. You'd think the safest form was round only...The Artificially Prolonged said:But wait square flapjacks have more corners than triangle ones!!! The damn school administration has just put those poor kids in even deadlier peril than they where in before!