Capcom Says Resident Evil 6 Will Be "Different"
- Thread starter John Funk
- Start date
Recommended Videos
You'd be surprised how reasonable we fanboys can be. On the Capcom Unity forums, gameplay is indeed the main concern of our enraged lot. We'll still ***** about DINO until we're blue in the face, but gameplay comes first.gigastar said:
What I'm afraid of is if the game turns out badly and sells poorly, Capcom will drop the series altogether as opposed to shifting to previously held design philosophies. That's another reason why this project worries me.
As for Asura's Wrath, I'm not quite sure what to think about that. While the art design and premise are interesting, they're also all we've seen so far. Well, that and the quick-time event thingies from that first trailer. I don't find quick-time events very inspiring.
True, but honestly I'd love to see the end of the series instead of an origin story. I know I know about this Tony Redgraves persona he went under when first starting out, but there's just a weird inconsistency about it. That being that Sparda had his sons 2000 years ago. Dante's Maturation is either really weird or he hit puberty later than Justin Bieber.gigastar said:
If theres one thing that MvC3 showed us, its that Capcom will never forget about its franchises. Besides i still dont think they would have let NT develop DmC without a reason. I mean, someone at Capcom must know how badly theyve done so far.Lord Beautiful said:
I dont think it counts as proper QTE's if the game is pulling them throughout the game. Besides, this game has promise for a good story, as its not actually made by Capcom.
Erm, Sparda, in fact, lived most of those 2000 years. Im not certain as to the circumstances of his death, but bieng a demon he must have had better longevity than most humans.Madara XIII said:
Also i think Dante would have been significantly quicker to get into demon hunting if he was 8 years old when demons killed his mother. If Dante was born 2000 years ago, then each game should be describing Sparda's exploit as being about 10 years ago.
Staying fresh has nothing to do with it, and adjustments and revamps are two completely different things. Take the Mario series, for example. They've all been pretty much exactly the same ever since Mario 64, give or take a few minor adjustments like the backpack in Sunshine. Part of the difference is that Mario isn't trying to force some terrible story down our throats that needed to be resolved long ago; which really, was the main point of my post.Torrasque said:
The problem with RE5 had nothing to do with the fact that it was the same gameplay style as RE4. The next Resident Evil game will suck or rock, regardless of what they do with the gameplay (unless they do something bad with the gameplay, at which point I'll be reminded of the old saying about fixing something that isn't broke).
I can get scary in all sorts of places, but when I play RE, I want over-the-top action, explosives, chainsaws, secret agents, giant tentacled monsters and huge guys crashing through walls following me everywhere.
Early Resident Evil games were more scary, but still ridiculous. I think Capcom could work a little harder in the atmosphere department and make more legitimately scary enemies, but I beg you Capcom, put FUN first.
Early Resident Evil games were more scary, but still ridiculous. I think Capcom could work a little harder in the atmosphere department and make more legitimately scary enemies, but I beg you Capcom, put FUN first.
New direction? RE: Go karts. Yes!
No you just described RE: Outbreak. Oh, please just make a glitch and lag free better version of Outbreak and we'll all be happy.MattRooney06 said:
Resident Evil stopped being scary when the controls only became semi-broken instead of borderline unbearable. Work the shooter angle well Capcom but make my resources scare so it's actually a challenge.
True. Being scared and being in the midst of an intense situation, such as being in a hallway filled with zombies with no ammo, are two different things. The majority of a survival horror game being scary is tied up in its atmosphere, not the intesity of the situation. Any old shooter can give you that, but sitting up at night with the lights off creeping through an old mansion or a empty police station can really give you the heebie-jeebies. I don't see why the two can't be in the same game and still be considered both intense and scary.Blindrooster said:I dont get very scared when I'm in a hallway filled with zombiez......and a shotgun with oodles of ammo. gotta make ya feel helpless to scare.BrionJames said:But, people are scared by different things.
apparently someone involved in making RE5 (be it the director or Wesker's voice actor) I read somewhere said that Wesker won't be coming back in RE6, thatRadoh said:
he's dead for good
but it's whatever. I'm not a huge RE fan so I'm not really all that concerned. but who can argue with someone with a cool voice, persistent shades, and can dodge bullets matrix style? xD
Of course I am still waiting on the Cell Shaded, Soft Classic Music Playing, Romantic Storyline with deep touches of a society pressures and issues being dealt with. Yes RE6 will definitely be greatness
*Yeah..*
I dunno can they make a good RE again? If they go the Scary route they can do that we have way to many action games, shooters and so on. A scary game in what you are weaker then the opponents sounds like allot of fun [so unlike RE4, a good game but lets be fair.. shotgun blast through the head!]
I feel that times change and even though if an "off timezone" you can make a certain type of game like lets say making a JRPG right now it probably won't be seen as super great. Because the current market pulls so much to shooters and action games. Hell maybe Indie games indeed can wake up the sleeping giants.
Back to RE6, can they make a great game? I think so.. if they dare to do something. They have to make choice if they want to much they might put water by the wine.
*Yeah..*
I dunno can they make a good RE again? If they go the Scary route they can do that we have way to many action games, shooters and so on. A scary game in what you are weaker then the opponents sounds like allot of fun [so unlike RE4, a good game but lets be fair.. shotgun blast through the head!]
I feel that times change and even though if an "off timezone" you can make a certain type of game like lets say making a JRPG right now it probably won't be seen as super great. Because the current market pulls so much to shooters and action games. Hell maybe Indie games indeed can wake up the sleeping giants.
Back to RE6, can they make a great game? I think so.. if they dare to do something. They have to make choice if they want to much they might put water by the wine.
What I want is a superb merging of action and horror. Moments that make you go "HOLY SHIT" and moments that scare the shit out of you. Long moments of tension and fright unexpectedly broken down into chaos or something. Just because something has action in it does not mean that your loaded up with ammunition, or just because something has horror in it does not mean that there cannot be jaw dropping moments. Maybe I am asking for too much.
First off when they made re4 it was different but very good game, but it was suppose 2be about the zombies. And 5 wqas great also but it wasn't scary any more. You got people riding bikes and and shooting arrows back. I miss the zombies so I hope its not f'd up...bring the zombies back!!!
