I know it seems stupid now, however, Google is a multi-billion dollar conglomerate. If they can't defend themselves from the idiocy of a government looking for someone else to blame, I doubt that any other search engine will. If Google is removed entirely, what stops people from doing to same to other search engines. After all, it would be easier, most are much smaller than Google, and in the case of Yahoo, etc. things could still work, it's the same type of media, being posted by the same type of people. However, the wrong people are being prosecuted because of it.wordsmith said:wow.. no google. How ever will we find another search engine?
It is correct.Tiamat666 said:I thought that Google had reached an agreement with the chinese government to censor "inappropriate" search results. I'm sure I read that sometime on Slashdot.
The Chinese government actually perfectly understands how internet work. It's a tool that, although being accessed via multiple private companies, allows access to plenty of content which you can quickly find with search engines.AceDiamond said:Once again the people in power never cease to amaze me in how out of touch they are with how the Internet actually works.
It's actually like you're asking for a book about veggie cooking, so the librarian hands you one called "Famous Italian Desserts from the 19th Century", with suggestive pictures on page twelve.Graustein said:As I understand it, that's what China is trying to do, just block it from all their IPs. China most definitely does not have the power to shut down Google itself, but they can, with relative ease, simply block Google from their IPs.Enigmers said:The best they can do is get Google banned from all Chinese IPs (or ban all Chinese IPs from Google.) I honestly don't see what the problem with googles is, it's like asking a librarian to find you a book. If you ask for porn and then try to kill the librarian because they brought you porn, there's something wrong with YOU. not the people who make porn, and not the person who brought you the porn. it's YOU.
As for the librarian porn analogy, it's more along the lines of person A asking the Librarian for porn, and person B shutting down the library for having porn in the first place. The one doing the searching and the one doing the punishing are seperate people.
Actually Google keeps a cache of most of its search results, but I don't know whether they store that themselves or take it from somewhere like archive.org.Savandicus said:I didnt realise that google actually had any of thier content actually on their site, dont search engines just provide links and take short text extracts and pictures from other sites and therefore those are the ones that need taking down and not google.
Couldn't have put it better myselfNoMoreSanity said:Google is not a site. It is a search engine. It can be used to find bad sites, but dogs can do bad things as well, like sniff peoples balls.
Hey, let's ban dogs now shall we?
Actually I believe the filter is being pushed more by Stephen Conroy than Rudd. Regardless, it'll be gone in the next federal election. I'm sure it'll be one of the Coalition's "vote for us!" campaigns.Danzorz said:On the flip side KevinDuddRudd wants to filter the internet, good luck...
How about Dogpile? because it includes google results, as well as every other search engine on earth.wordsmith said:wow.. no google. How ever will we find another search engine?
Yes, they did. The Chinese version of Google's search engine (www.google.cn) will not return certain webpages that disparage the Chinese government, after the end of a long and heated negotiation between China and Google. But now China is saying they want to shut down Google completely in China, although I don't think they're saying they want it shut down worldwide (unless I'm wrong, that's just what I understood from what I read). They are trying to halt rebellion by stopping people from voicing dissent, and from seeing what other people have to say bad about the government. It's the idea that if the Chinese people only see the good side of their government and aren't allowed to talk about the bad part, it just won't exist. In other words, sweeping it under the rug.Tiamat666 said:I thought that Google had reached an agreement with the chinese government to censor "inappropriate" search results. I'm sure I read that sometime on Slashdot.
Does Google sniff people's balls too, or am i missing something...or maybe dogs give you an incredibly easy way to porn/other 'unacceptable' material.smon said:Couldn't have put it better myselfNoMoreSanity said:Google is not a site. It is a search engine. It can be used to find bad sites, but dogs can do bad things as well, like sniff peoples balls.
Hey, let's ban dogs now shall we?
actually google caches alot of the searched sites, then there are all other google sites, this is not just google search engine but also things like news feeds and all other google syndication sites, like youtubesmallharmlesskitten said:Yes...but governments are stupidsavandicus said:I didnt realise that google actually had any of thier content actually on their site, dont search engines just provide links and take short text extracts and pictures from other sites and therefore those are the ones that need taking down and not google.
Okay, just think about what would happen if the internet just ceased to be.CUnk said:I'm sure they would love nothing more than to see the internet go away.Danny Ocean said:As if. If they do this every single hacker on earth is going to through a hissy fit and crash the internet. Then what will they do!?