Locke_Cole said:
No offense but I find a little of that far fetched. Without any form of citation to laws and such I can also claim that unless you ride a purple rhino to work you will be arrested and you can't argue it. Also I don't quite understand why you appear upset over the classmate who got 10 years for a "crime spree".
Again, this type of stuff if it is actually true, is not isolated to Japan. I don't mean to pick on the US but since they are the contrast in the article they make the best comparison. I can pull up the beating of Rodney King as an example of US police. Now that's not entirely fair since it was just one incident, but that's essentially what you're doing there to prove your point.
While Gindil's post is a little exaggerated, I can definitely vouch for his claim here that you are "guilty until proven innocent". In fact, the high conviction rate is so bad that recently Japan started trying to use a jury system to lower the numbers. It'll be interesting to see if it works out.
So what does this all have to do with crime statistics? I mean, after all, if the conviction rate is higher, the crime rate should be higher as well, right? Well, not necessarily. Many people are reluctant to report cases simply because they know their testimony could be "judge, jury and executioner" for other person. I personally know a number of women that were molested in a crowded train, but they didn't say anything because they weren't sure exactly who it was, and they didn't want to ruin the wrong person's life.
Now do I believe there's a secret crime wave in Japan? No, of course not. It's still much safer here than many parts in the US. At the same time though, this country isn't the paradise of safety and equality that Nogami's letter would have you believe. At least, I know plenty of other Japanese people that might raise an objection or two over some of the claims he makes.