Consiparcy Theories
- Thread starter captainwillies
- Start date
Recommended Videos
the contradiction in this is crazy! Alsocaptainwillies said:My favourite is Hollow-Earth theory. in which the earth is hollow and people live on the inside
for more just check this site out
http://www.truthism.com/
crazy guy- "your wrong because you cant give any proof".
normal guy-"But look at all these writing and buildings"!
crazy guy- "That doesnt count because its fake."
normal guy- "how do you know yours isnt"!
crazy guy- "because its the truth"
normal guy- "fuck off reptile boy."
Sorry, but your argument is logically invalid. First off, "You're wrong because you can't give any proof" is a logical fallacy. "Lack of proof is not disproof," as it were.Knight Templar said:the contradiction in this is crazy! Alsocaptainwillies said:My favourite is Hollow-Earth theory. in which the earth is hollow and people live on the inside
for more just check this site out
http://www.truthism.com/
crazy guy- "your wrong because you cant give any proof".
normal guy-"But look at all these writing and buildings"!
crazy guy- "That doesnt count because its fake."
normal guy- "how do you know yours isnt"!
crazy guy- "because its the truth"
normal guy- "fuck off reptile boy."
And "That doesn't count because it's fake" and "Because it's the truth" are both examples of the Bare Assertion fallacy, as they both boil down to "Because I said so."
9-11 was a controlled demolition (ala Rosie O'Donnell.) Imagine 20,000 workers all saying "My, isn't it interesting how these mysterious government workers are ripping out walls, cutting concrete away from the columns, and wrapping them with detcord and TNT? Oh well, it's certainly not worth mentioning to anyone."
ALLRIGHT, let me disproof the theory that we never went to the moon.
On a daily basis, scientists worldwide shoots lasers up at mirrors on the surface of the moon, to measure the distance from earth to moon. Those mirrors are actually big enough that you can see them in a high quality hobby telescope (do that if you don't beleive me).
If we never went to the moon, how the freggin fuck did those mirrors then get there???
And all of you who says we where never on the moon 'cus of the flag is waving in the wind, are STUPID. The flag is held up by a steel bar, and the reason for why its waving is that it's vibrating (and it keeps doing so 'cus there is no air-resistance).
Also i reccomend being highly sceptical about conspiracy theories, only what you have proof of is true, all other is religion.
On a daily basis, scientists worldwide shoots lasers up at mirrors on the surface of the moon, to measure the distance from earth to moon. Those mirrors are actually big enough that you can see them in a high quality hobby telescope (do that if you don't beleive me).
If we never went to the moon, how the freggin fuck did those mirrors then get there???
And all of you who says we where never on the moon 'cus of the flag is waving in the wind, are STUPID. The flag is held up by a steel bar, and the reason for why its waving is that it's vibrating (and it keeps doing so 'cus there is no air-resistance).
Also i reccomend being highly sceptical about conspiracy theories, only what you have proof of is true, all other is religion.
Know what's the funniest thing about scientific explanations for Bible events proposed by Christians? It cheapens the religion.i_am_undead said:
I've got a friend who believes the first lunar landing was fake, so he's not too bad. Also, the Da Vinci code is a load of old cobblers.
Marion Cottiard (recent Oscar winning French actress) has apparently said that 9/11 was a way for "them" to get rid of the Towers instead of having to modernise them. She also doubts the 1969 moon landing. There should be videos of her comments of Y/Tube
I've seen a number of those things with the "proof" (most memorable being Zeitgeist), and while some arguments make sense, others just seem a little on the edge of insane for me. Namely, the missile hitting the pentagon theory. The argument that a plane is not maneuverable enough to get down to that level of the building applies to a missile, it's nigh impossible to make that kind of a pinpoint strike. Plus, the fact that there wasn't a giant explosion, only fire, would have to mean the missile had a pathetic payload.Indigo_Dingo said:
But some of the "proof" presented does make me question, such as the whole passport incident. Going through a fireball and landing in perfect condition does make me question that part of the story, as does the fact that the guy was still alive. XD