Reptillians aside *kaff*, there is some sort of mangled truth in a lot of those articles, or rather, after you're done laughing your face off, some of it at the very least makes you think. Take the Reptillian one as an example: "Strangely enough, though, here on Earth, the concept of an imaginary god is perfectly acceptable, and is by no means considered to be the "ultimate crazy fantasy." Yet, the concept of aliens is taboo, and is ultra-ridiculed by society in a freakish "hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil"-type fashion."
Of course, the author kind of goes off then by trying to say that the Reptillians really do exist: "Well, obviously, this is due to the fact that aliens are indeed real, whereas imaginary gods are not." Obviously...skk, personally I don't believe in anything in particular, but, the author seems to contradict him/herself. I mean, granted, neither I think exist, but by that same token, I wouldn't assume them not to until it had been expressly proven as so. Otherwise, I don't care either way.