Controversial Games

Recommended Videos

stompy

New member
Jan 21, 2008
2,951
0
0
dragonburner said:
stompy said:
dragonburner said:
So, the majority should not be able to discuss, or explore, the issue, because the minority's work angers you?
What? That makes no sense to me.
Your argument, from what I gather, is basically: "All 9-11 games I've seen are offensive, so no 9-11 games should exist." I'm asking, just because a small number of the games relating to 9-11 are offensive to you, the entire subject should be taboo for developers?

Kogarian said:
This thread stops being worth the effort when nationalistic idiots get their hands on keyboards.
Unfortunate, since this is an issue worth discussing (in a global sense, not just one or two topics).
 

szaleniec1000

New member
Nov 11, 2008
196
0
0
zombiebeard said:
Anoctris said:
zombiebeard said:
... controversial i.e. GTA, Spore(Evolution! Oh no!) ...
LOL Spore - didn't even think of that. Did the "Creationists" or "Intelligent Design" guys get upset about that one?
Quite a few Christian groups got offended by claiming that teaching children about evolution was wrong, even spawning a small handful of anti-spore websites.
I think the main one was a Poe, but it wouldn't surprise me if some had been serious.
 

Syntax Error

New member
Sep 7, 2008
2,323
0
0
Wait for a war that America didn't win. If there are no games made for it, I'm probably not alone in the belief that the makers of WW2 game are self-righteous hypocritical yanks (WW2 games that depict America and its soldiers as badass, anyway). If it does get made, expect a lot of public backlash from, you guessed it, Americans. See, it's only funny if it's not YOU on the receiving end.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Syntax Error said:
Wait for a war that America didn't win. If there are no games made for it, I'm probably not alone in the belief that the makers of WW2 game are self-righteous hypocritical yanks (WW2 games that depict America and its soldiers as badass, anyway). If it does get made, expect a lot of public backlash from, you guessed it, Americans. See, it's only funny if it's not YOU on the receiving end.
I believe there have been a few Vietnam wargames, but admittly, not big hits, and certainly not to the same scale as WW2.
 

Syntax Error

New member
Sep 7, 2008
2,323
0
0
Oh wait, let me be more specific:

Wait for a war that America didn't win. If there are no games made for it, I'm probably not alone in the belief that the makers of WW2 game are self-righteous hypocritical yanks (WW2 games that depict America and its soldiers as badass, anyway). If it does get made and it didn't make it appear as though America and her soldiers are the most technologically advanced badasses, if they were portrayed as you would portray those German soldiers from just about any WW2 game, expect a lot of public backlash from, you guessed it, Americans. See, it's only funny if it's not YOU on the receiving end.

Sorry for the Copy-Pasta. It's just so deliciously lazy-inducing.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Syntax Error said:
Oh wait, let me be more specific:

Wait for a war that America didn't win. If there are no games made for it, I'm probably not alone in the belief that the makers of WW2 game are self-righteous hypocritical yanks (WW2 games that depict America and its soldiers as badass, anyway). If it does get made and it didn't make it appear as though America and her soldiers are the most technologically advanced badasses, if they were portrayed as you would portray those German soldiers from just about any WW2 game, expect a lot of public backlash from, you guessed it, Americans. See, it's only funny if it's not YOU on the receiving end.

Sorry for the Copy-Pasta. It's just so deliciously lazy-inducing.
To be frank, unless you're going to do a war game set in the time of Independence or the second war with Britain via Canada, or WWI, America historically has been the technologically advanced nation or the nation with the ability to outnumber their enemy to death (WWII - although there weapons weren't bad, they still relied on mass producting Germany to death).

As for bad-asses, well, I didn't play those Vietnam games, so I can't tell if they show the American to be 'bad-ass' or not. And to be honest again, the German soldiers in most WWII games are shown to be tatically good. And lets not forget, the Germans in the real WWII were mass murders, so I can't say I'm going to cry alot of crodile tears for them.
 

Cortheya

Elite Member
Jan 10, 2009
1,200
0
41
miracleofsound said:
Anoctris said:
dragonburner said:
harhol said:
dragonburner said:
911 killed civilians and destroyed families.
So did World War 2 and Medieval warfare.
Yeah on both sides
911 killed the suicide bombers and people in the towers, on the ground, and others
It didn't magicly kill people in other cities
plus it happend 7 years ago compared to like 20 and hundreds
they have names for how many years ago those battles were
Ah - so there's a shelf life on atrocities.
Didn't you hear? AIDS is finally funny now. They said it in south park.
I've seen it on family guy tons of times
 

bad rider

The prodigal son of a goat boy
Dec 23, 2007
2,252
0
0
dragonburner said:
bad rider said:
dragonburner said:
bad rider said:
dragonburner said:
bad rider said:
dragonburner said:
LOOY said:
dragonburner said:
911 killed civilians and destroyed families. What if I ripped on your dad getting blown up unprovoked.
And what about all the "Non-American" Families that get blown every time america decides to invade somewhere?
know your facts. Is there a game where you do a blitz on London or something? No! War games are just about war with a little history in between missions. A 911 game would be about blowing up people in a terrorist strike.
*cough*GTA:london *cough*
*cough*Stupid Kid*cough*
What it's a legitmate point, but if we want to start mud slinging, your smelly.
HAHA. Hilarious. Where is the legitimacy of comparing GTA: London with the blitz. Was there even car bombs? Also GTA is about gang violence not terrorism.
know your facts. Is there a game where you do a blitz on London or something? No!

You said or something and I gave you a similar scenario.

A 911 game would be about blowing up people in a terrorist strike.

Running around London shooting and blowing up people with a variety of weapons. It's ok if you don't think that's terrorism then fine but it's pretty fucking close.
Excuse me Captain Loophole! So I said "or something"! By the way isn't GTA IV in a version of New York? Lastly, I corrected your post grammatically
So thats actually a good point despite jack thompson most of the videogame community accepted GTA:IV with open arms so controversial games are ok by most peoples standards. Also thankyou for correcting my grammer I didn't get the time too.
 

letsnoobtehpwns

New member
Dec 28, 2008
1,628
0
0
I think Fallout 3 was offensive. It really made the nuke victims look like flesh-hungry zombies and they used the term "ghoul" when the P.C. way to say it is "Radiation Intolerant Human".
 

FinalGamer

New member
Mar 8, 2009
966
0
0
I remember a game that was made by Scottish people that recreated the JFK assassination.
At first I was rather irked by it but....well when you start shooting other things and fucking with the physics of it, it became actually hilarious and 4chan made a game out of it.
"How much of this day can you fuck up?" One guy had the entire limo just FLIP!

Syntax Error said:
Wait for a war that America didn't win. If there are no games made for it, I'm probably not alone in the belief that the makers of WW2 game are self-righteous hypocritical yanks (WW2 games that depict America and its soldiers as badass, anyway). If it does get made, expect a lot of public backlash from, you guessed it, Americans. See, it's only funny if it's not YOU on the receiving end.
Actually Medal of Honour: Rising Sun was developed by Americans and Japanese developers, as they say in the commentary extras in the game.
As for a game made by Americans of a war you didn't win....I thought Vietcong would count but that was made by Czech developers.
HEY, Call of Duty 4! Americans made that right? Admittedly it's not about the actual second Gulf War but rather a war similar to it. And the Americans lost. HARD.
Until the SAS help them out that is. That count at all?
 

Lost In The Void

When in doubt, curl up and cry
Aug 27, 2008
10,128
0
0
Doug said:
Syntax Error said:
Oh wait, let me be more specific:

Wait for a war that America didn't win. If there are no games made for it, I'm probably not alone in the belief that the makers of WW2 game are self-righteous hypocritical yanks (WW2 games that depict America and its soldiers as badass, anyway). If it does get made and it didn't make it appear as though America and her soldiers are the most technologically advanced badasses, if they were portrayed as you would portray those German soldiers from just about any WW2 game, expect a lot of public backlash from, you guessed it, Americans. See, it's only funny if it's not YOU on the receiving end.

Sorry for the Copy-Pasta. It's just so deliciously lazy-inducing.
To be frank, unless you're going to do a war game set in the time of Independence or the second war with Britain via Canada, or WWI, America historically has been the technologically advanced nation or the nation with the ability to outnumber their enemy to death (WWII - although there weapons weren't bad, they still relied on mass producting Germany to death).

As for bad-asses, well, I didn't play those Vietnam games, so I can't tell if they show the American to be 'bad-ass' or not. And to be honest again, the German soldiers in most WWII games are shown to be tatically good. And lets not forget, the Germans in the real WWII were mass murders, so I can't say I'm going to cry alot of crodile tears for them.
That right there is very closed minded. For one the Germans were not mass murderers those "Germans" you are talking about were members of the Nazi party and even then only high tranking soldiers even knew about the Holocaust. A German soldier in that war was no different then the Allied ones; they were all scared and killing only to survive. Second many civillians only joined the Nazi party because it provided something better than the Shit hole they were living in, and again none knew about Hitler's insane ideals.

Then let's not forget why Hitler even came to power in the first place. The allies punished the Germans with almost the whole cost of the war sending Germany into it's own Great Depression when they didn't start the war they were simply trapped in the same alliance system all the superpowers were at the time. If you want to get technical Austria- Hungary and Serbia started that one. Hitler was simply again a way out of the shit hole they were in. It can actually be the equivilent of the American people electing Obama as their new president. He promised a way out of the recession so people wre jumping at the chance. You cannot say that you wouldn't do the same in their situation. So saying that the German people wre mass murderers makes you an ill-informed person with no respect for the true history of war.

Sorry for the long post but i just hate little idiotic statements such as that one, and no i'm not German i'm the American's neighbour to the North
 

FinalGamer

New member
Mar 8, 2009
966
0
0
There are Germans and there are Nazis, fair enough, same as there are Americans and there are Klansmen.
And there were quite a few Germans who tried to help fight Nazism from discussions against it such as the White Rose group to actually trying to kill Hitler in Operation Valkyrie.
 

bubbington

New member
Feb 15, 2009
6
0
0
pimppeter2 said:
bubbington said:
I'm not saying anyone 'deserved' 9/11, but to be such fucking whiners about it really highlights American cultural isolation. Hell, just look at Latin America and the democratically elected leaders removed and replaced with brutal dicators. Look at the pics of Rumsfeld and Saddam together. Look at the training and funding Osama got from the US. The US has been fucking with the world, killing - directly or indirectly - an inordinate number of civilians for decades.

Blame are gov all you want, but were not whinning for the country, were whining because the people, you know the actual people that got killed.


Please tel me what "American cultural isolation" means, Cause im talking it to mean that Americans are ignorant or dont care about the world(the actuall people)
Well, I'm not suggesting that Americans are ignorant in the pejorative sense, but in the sense that they are simply not exposed to the world to the extent that many other developed nations are. Simple geography offers some explanation. The US has only two 'close' neighbours and your near neighbours in S. America are not exactly powerful political forces. When you combine that with the fact that the US utterly dominates its neighbours, a lack of interest in the outside world is not unexpected. It just doesn't have the immediacy that Europe and Asia enjoy. Your territory has also never been directly attacked (yes, Pearl Harbour, but Hawaii isn't very near to the continental US. Not the same psychological effect), thus a more gung-ho attitude to war pervades the cultural milieu. For the rest of the developed world, there are/were a good portion of of the populace that knew what war meant to civilians. Mainland European countries are often painted as cowards by the US (Freedom fries anyone?), but these are countries that were recently stage to the largest conflict in history (and plenty of them have suffered domestic terrorism - IRA, ETA, etc).

So, the whining made the isolationism clear in the sense that it was shocking and terrible, but the country seemed unable to comprehend what had happened and get over it in any reasonable sense. Compare that to the reaction to the 7/7 bombings in London - the next day most people went out with a 'fuck you' attitude and carried on living. It's not that people weren't devastated, but - I theorize - there is a cultural acceptance of such events as part of life and not let them control you. The US reaction was essentially hysterical fear for quite a while.

Well, that's enough for now, eh?
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Lost In The Void said:
Doug said:
Syntax Error said:
Oh wait, let me be more specific:

Wait for a war that America didn't win. If there are no games made for it, I'm probably not alone in the belief that the makers of WW2 game are self-righteous hypocritical yanks (WW2 games that depict America and its soldiers as badass, anyway). If it does get made and it didn't make it appear as though America and her soldiers are the most technologically advanced badasses, if they were portrayed as you would portray those German soldiers from just about any WW2 game, expect a lot of public backlash from, you guessed it, Americans. See, it's only funny if it's not YOU on the receiving end.

Sorry for the Copy-Pasta. It's just so deliciously lazy-inducing.
To be frank, unless you're going to do a war game set in the time of Independence or the second war with Britain via Canada, or WWI, America historically has been the technologically advanced nation or the nation with the ability to outnumber their enemy to death (WWII - although there weapons weren't bad, they still relied on mass producting Germany to death).

As for bad-asses, well, I didn't play those Vietnam games, so I can't tell if they show the American to be 'bad-ass' or not. And to be honest again, the German soldiers in most WWII games are shown to be tatically good. And lets not forget, the Germans in the real WWII were mass murders, so I can't say I'm going to cry alot of crodile tears for them.
That right there is very closed minded. For one the Germans were not mass murderers those "Germans" you are talking about were members of the Nazi party and even then only high tranking soldiers even knew about the Holocaust. A German soldier in that war was no different then the Allied ones; they were all scared and killing only to survive. Second many civillians only joined the Nazi party because it provided something better than the Shit hole they were living in, and again none knew about Hitler's insane ideals.

Then let's not forget why Hitler even came to power in the first place. The allies punished the Germans with almost the whole cost of the war sending Germany into it's own Great Depression when they didn't start the war they were simply trapped in the same alliance system all the superpowers were at the time. If you want to get technical Austria- Hungary and Serbia started that one. Hitler was simply again a way out of the shit hole they were in. It can actually be the equivilent of the American people electing Obama as their new president. He promised a way out of the recession so people wre jumping at the chance. You cannot say that you wouldn't do the same in their situation. So saying that the German people wre mass murderers makes you an ill-informed person with no respect for the true history of war.

Sorry for the long post but i just hate little idiotic statements such as that one, and no i'm not German i'm the American's neighbour to the North
Don't lecture me about the war. I know all about the Weimar Republic and Hilter's rise to power - about the treaty of Versailles, the League of Nations, the failure to act against Hilter in the Rhineland, the surrender of the Sudetenland by Britain and France, the occupation of Czechoslovakia, and all the little hints that Hilter was a danger that my country and France failed to heed because we were so eager to avoid war.

And to state 'only High Ranking officers' knew about the mass murder (or at least, went along with it) is a very simplified version of the war. Ask the Russian's or Pole's, in who's towns and villages where frequently destroyed by German army units because they weren't important enough to expend soldiers on taking. Not to mention, a few evil men can't implement a plan of that scale and scope. Regular army units where used to police the Warsaw ghettos, although I will admit probably only SS units where involved in the operation of the death camps.

Ok, not all of German army took part in Hilter's plans for mass murder, but they helped execute the detention and then murder of Jews, Poles, Slovics, and any other 'inferior peoples'. Some Germans did resist Hilter, but bluntly, these efforts only represented a small fraction of the population.
 

Remleiz

New member
Jan 25, 2009
630
0
0
Reminds me of a tv drama a while ago here about Hitler, it caused a backlash but it was really well done, and gave insight into his life.

Im not a nazi by any means, but by using this as an example, there should be 2 sides to ever story/game. So if we get yet ANOTHER WW2 game, how about the choice to play as the Nazis or the Communists or somthing as well as the Allies?
 

Syntax Error

New member
Sep 7, 2008
2,323
0
0
Doug said:
Don't lecture me about the war. I know all about the Weimar Republic and Hilter's rise to power - about the treaty of Versailles, the League of Nations, the failure to act against Hilter in the Rhineland, the surrender of the Sudetenland by Britain and France, the occupation of Czechoslovakia, and all the little hints that Hilter was a danger that my country and France failed to heed because we were so eager to avoid war.

And to state 'only High Ranking officers' knew about the mass murder (or at least, went along with it) is a very simplified version of the war. Ask the Russian's or Pole's, in who's towns and villages where frequently destroyed by German army units because they weren't important enough to expend soldiers on taking. Not to mention, a few evil men can't implement a plan of that scale and scope. Regular army units where used to police the Warsaw ghettos, although I will admit probably only SS units where involved in the operation of the death camps.

Ok, not all of German army took part in Hilter's plans for mass murder, but they helped execute the detention and then murder of Jews, Poles, Slovics, and any other 'inferior peoples'. Some Germans did resist Hilter, but bluntly, these efforts only represented a small fraction of the population.
I wonder if the reason that not more Germans resisted Hitler was out of fear? Combine that with their economy at the time and you can see why they didn't resist, even if they wanted to.

I wonder if there would be a game based on a war that was fought on American soil... Not that I'm wishing for it to happen, I just happened to realize that the only war fought in America was the Civil War (Where it was basically in-fighting, unless I got my facts wrong. Not exactly the go-to guy for info on this subject.
 

jimduckie

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,218
0
0
i have no problems with these games or any other controversial games like GTA, POSTAL ,ETC what really pisses me off are those hypocritical types that whine about the games and never played them isn't that right mr . thompson ?
 

dragonburner

New member
Feb 21, 2009
475
0
0
bad rider said:
dragonburner said:
bad rider said:
dragonburner said:
bad rider said:
dragonburner said:
bad rider said:
dragonburner said:
LOOY said:
dragonburner said:
911 killed civilians and destroyed families. What if I ripped on your dad getting blown up unprovoked.
And what about all the "Non-American" Families that get blown every time america decides to invade somewhere?
know your facts. Is there a game where you do a blitz on London or something? No! War games are just about war with a little history in between missions. A 911 game would be about blowing up people in a terrorist strike.
*cough*GTA:london *cough*
*cough*Stupid Kid*cough*
What it's a legitmate point, but if we want to start mud slinging, your smelly.
HAHA. Hilarious. Where is the legitimacy of comparing GTA: London with the blitz. Was there even car bombs? Also GTA is about gang violence not terrorism.
know your facts. Is there a game where you do a blitz on London or something? No!

You said or something and I gave you a similar scenario.

A 911 game would be about blowing up people in a terrorist strike.

Running around London shooting and blowing up people with a variety of weapons. It's ok if you don't think that's terrorism then fine but it's pretty fucking close.
Excuse me Captain Loophole! So I said "or something"! By the way isn't GTA IV in a version of New York? Lastly, I corrected your post grammatically
So thats actually a good point despite jack thompson most of the videogame community accepted GTA:IV with open arms so controversial games are ok by most peoples standards. Also thankyou for correcting my grammer I didn't get the time too.
I see what you mean. cool
 

dragonburner

New member
Feb 21, 2009
475
0
0
stompy said:
dragonburner said:
stompy said:
dragonburner said:
So, the majority should not be able to discuss, or explore, the issue, because the minority's work angers you?
What? That makes no sense to me.
Your argument, from what I gather, is basically: "All 9-11 games I've seen are offensive, so no 9-11 games should exist." I'm asking, just because a small number of the games relating to 9-11 are offensive to you, the entire subject should be taboo for developers?

Kogarian said:
This thread stops being worth the effort when nationalistic idiots get their hands on keyboards.
Unfortunate, since this is an issue worth discussing (in a global sense, not just one or two topics).
See what I am saying is a video game about terrorism is offensive. Earlier in the post someone used 9/11 as an example. I find all acts of evil/terrorism are taboo when put in the context of "This is fun" or "This is Cool". It isn't and games like that give the wrong message.